The Digital Marketplace and Business Intelligence
Why it matters: every decision in this course, from who to target to what to spend, starts with what's true about your market. Getting that wrong is expensive; getting it right is a skill employers notice. Most marketing goes wrong before anyone writes an advert, because it's built on guesses. This topic swaps guesses for evidence.
By the end of this topic you will have chosen one real organisation to work on for the whole course, mapped where its customers, competitors and partners meet online and offline, built a log of sources you have checked, and scanned its market for three implications for its marketing.
Progress marker: I can map my organisation's digital marketplace and back every claim about it with a source I've checked.
Rate yourself now: before you start, open the Progress Map in the Marketing in Practice Progress Map and Topic 1 Workbook and rate yourself on this marker as not yet, with support, independently or could teach it. You'll rate all the other markers in Lesson 1.1.
Choose your route: start with Lesson 1.1 if you haven't chosen your organisation yet; everything else builds on that choice. If your manager has just asked "what's going on in our market?", read Lesson 1.3 and Lesson 1.4 first, then come back. Lesson 1.4 uses the map from Lesson 1.2 and the source log from Lesson 1.3.
Marketing in Practice Progress Map and Topic 1 Workbook
Rate yourself on all 15 progress markers (not yet, with support, independently, could teach it) and update them after each topic; then keep topic 1's work in one place: your organisation profile, marketplace map, source log, PESTLE and competitor snapshot, and three implications.
1.1Your Organisation, Your Portfolio, Your Starting Point
This course follows one organisation from start to finish. You'll pick it now, and every task in every topic is applied to it. By the end your work adds up to one portfolio: a single collection of work that shows an employer what you can do.
The course runs in a fixed order through four stages. Foundation is about reading your market, your customers and the rules, and setting the numbers you'll be judged on. Practitioner plans and briefs a campaign. Commercial follows the money. Leader proves what worked and makes the case for what comes next. Each stage ends with a milestone that gathers your work: a strategic audit, a campaign plan, an ecommerce plan for a second market, and a performance review with a business case.
Choosing your organisation. Good choices are your employer, a placement, a live client, a club or society, or a business you know well as a customer. Pick one with enough public information: a website, social accounts, reviews and, ideally, a few news stories. You don't need a job or inside data. Every task works from what anyone can see.
Confidentiality. If your employer won't let you share details, either anonymise it ("a regional builders' merchant") and leave out anything private, or choose a well-documented public organisation instead. Never put confidential figures in your portfolio.
UK example: if your organisation is a UK company, its registered name, number, address and filing history are on the public register at Companies House, free to search. That's a quick way to check you have the right legal entity, and you'll use it again in Lesson 1.3.
Progress markers. Each topic has a progress marker, a plain statement of what you can now do. You rate yourself on a four-point scale: not yet, with support, independently, could teach it. Be honest: "not yet" on day one is the normal starting point, and the point of the course is to move it.
If you're stuck for a choice, use Larkfield Coffee Roasters for this topic and switch when you're ready. Larkfield is fictional and its figures are illustrative.
1.2The Digital Marketplace
Your organisation's digital marketplace is everywhere its customers, competitors and partners meet it online. Think of it as the set of places a customer passes through on the way to buying, and the places they go afterwards to talk about it.
A practical map usually covers:
- search results, both the ordinary listings and the ads above them
- social platforms, such as Instagram, Facebook, TikTok and LinkedIn
- video, especially how-to and review videos
- online marketplaces, where your organisation might sell, or where competitors already do
- review sites and the reviews inside marketplaces and maps
- apps, including delivery and booking apps
- the organisation's own website and email
- the offline places these connect to: shops, cafés, events, branches
Some of these places are run by intermediaries: businesses that sit between your organisation and its customers, such as a marketplace, a delivery app or a comparison site. They can bring customers, but they set the rules and take a cut.
A useful shorthand is owned, paid and earned. Owned is what your organisation controls, like its website and email list. Paid is space it buys, like ads. Earned is what others say, like reviews and press. You'll go deeper into these in Module 7.
UK example: the Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes a monthly retail sales release. Its September 2026 figures, published on 23 October 2026, put online sales at 28.8% of all retail sales. Online matters a great deal, but most retail spending in that month still happened somewhere else. So a good map never stops at the screen: it shows how online and offline places feed each other. Someone might find a café on a map app, then buy its coffee beans online a week later.
For each place on your map, ask three things. Is your organisation there? What happens there (discovery, comparison, purchase, complaint)? Who else is there competing for attention? Write one line for each. A map that says "Instagram: we post twice a week; competitors run giveaways; customers ask about delivery in the comments" is far more useful than a list of logos.
1.3Business Intelligence You Can Trust
Business intelligence is gathering, checking and organising information about your market, customers and competitors so that decisions rest on evidence. In this topic you'll use secondary research: information someone else has already collected. It's free, fast, and the right place to start before asking anyone a question yourself.
Good free UK sources include:
- official statistics from the ONS, on retail, households and the economy
- Companies House filings: a company's officers, filing history and accounts
- trade bodies for your sector, which often publish summaries of their members' views
- Google Trends, which shows how interest in a search term changes over time and by region
- competitors' websites and job adverts: prices, ranges, and the skills they're hiring for, which hint at their plans
- review sites: what customers praise and complain about, in their own words
- social listening: reading public conversations about a brand, a product or a topic
Each has limits. UK example: Companies House filings are public, but many small companies file abridged or micro-entity accounts with very little detail, so you may find no revenue figure at all. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 will change what small companies must file; in June 2026 the government moved the accounts changes to April 2028, so check Companies House's current guidance before you rely on a filing rule. Google Trends shows relative interest on a scale of 0 to 100, not the number of searches, so it can tell you a term is rising but not how many people searched for it.
Judging a source. Ask four questions. Who produced it? When? How do they know (did they measure it, survey people, or repeat someone else)? Why did they publish it (to inform, to sell, to campaign)? An official statistic, dated and with its method published, is usually high reliability. A supplier's blog claiming "sales are booming" is low.
Keep a source log. For every claim, write the claim, the source, the date and a reliability rating (high, medium or low) with a one-line reason. It takes minutes and saves you from repeating something you can't back up.
AI activity: ask an AI assistant for a PESTLE of your organisation's sector. Then check every point against a named source and mark it verified, wrong or unverified. Note what the AI got wrong or out of date, and add only the verified points to your source log. AI tools can sound sure about things that are old, invented or about another country.
1.4Scanning the Environment
Scanning the environment means looking at the forces outside your organisation that it can't control but must respond to. Two tools help: PESTLE and a competitor snapshot.
PESTLE stands for political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors. Treat it as a prompt list, not a form to fill in. Ask of each letter: what is changing that could affect our customers or our costs? Leave a box short if nothing much is happening there. Six thin boxes are worse than two strong ones.
UK example: on the legal row, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 banned fake reviews from 6 April 2025. For any organisation that relies on reviews, that's a legal factor worth noting, and you'll return to the rules in Module 5.
A competitor snapshot describes up to five competitors on the same few points:
- who they are (a named business, or a type such as "national subscription brands")
- their offer and price point
- the channels they use, taken from your marketplace map
- what customers say about them, from reviews
- one strength and one weakness
You may name real competitors for your own organisation. Stick to what you can see and source.
From findings to implications. A finding is a fact you have sourced. In Larkfield's scan, one finding is that more people own home brewing equipment. An implication answers "so what for us?": more people brewing at home means more people who care about freshness, so Larkfield should make its freshness easy to see. An implication should suggest something your organisation might do, stop doing or watch. Each one needs a source behind it, so point it to a row in your source log.
Three good implications are the goal. They don't need to be dramatic. They need to be true, relevant and specific to your organisation. Read the worked example later in this topic before you write yours: it shows a full scan for Larkfield, from map to implications. Later topics build on this scan: your research in Module 2 starts from what your source log already shows.
Larkfield's First Marketplace Scan
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and its figures are illustrative. It was founded in Derby in 2019 by Sarah Ahmed and has 14 staff. In the financial year to 31 March 2026 it took £1.2m: £540,000 (45%) from its own online shop, £480,000 (40%) from wholesale to 60 independent cafés in the East Midlands, and £180,000 (15%) from 25 farm shops and delis. Its marketing budget is £96,000 a year (8% of revenue). Maya Collins, marketing manager, and Leo Grant, digital marketing executive, build its first scan.
Step 1: the map. Leo lists where Larkfield's customers, competitors and partners meet it: Larkfield's own site; search results; Instagram and Facebook; YouTube brewing videos; review sites; online marketplaces, where Larkfield doesn't sell yet but competitors may; and local cafés and farm shops offline. The cafés matter twice: they're customers, and they're where many people first taste Larkfield's coffee.
Step 2: the source log. Maya won't let a claim into the scan without a row in the log: the claim, the source, the date, and a reliability rating with a reason. Official statistics such as the ONS retail sales release rate high. Competitors' own websites rate high for their prices on the day she checked, and low for their claims about themselves.
Step 3: PESTLE and competitors. Maya uses PESTLE as prompts and leaves thin rows short. She describes competitors by type only: national coffee subscription brands, supermarket own-label and branded coffee, and other independent roasters, with one strength and one weakness each.
Step 4: three implications.
| Implication for Larkfield | Kind of source behind it |
|---|---|
| 1. More home brewing equipment means more people who care about freshness | Brewing videos, search interest in brewing terms, review themes |
| 2. Price pressure: shoppers are comparing price per bag | Competitors' and supermarkets' websites, checked on a dated day |
| 3. Expectations on packaging and sourcing claims are rising | Review themes, and the rules on environmental claims |
Each implication points to a source-log row, so anyone can check it. That's what you'll do for your own organisation next.
Knowledge Check
A friend says their organisation "isn't really online" because it sells through shops. Why is it still worth mapping its digital marketplace?
Customers search, read reviews, watch videos and compare prices online before and after buying in person, and competitors and intermediaries are there too. The ONS put online sales at 28.8% of retail sales in September 2026. Most spending is offline, but online and offline places feed each other.A new competitor starts selling a similar product on an online marketplace your organisation doesn't use. Using your marketplace map from Lesson 1.2, what should you add and ask?
Add the marketplace as a place where a competitor now meets your customers, note what happens there (discovery, comparison, reviews, price), and ask whether your customers shop there, what the competitor's offer and price look like, and whether your organisation should watch, respond or join.Google Trends shows interest in a search term doubling over a year. What can and can't you conclude?
You can conclude that interest relative to all searches has risen in that place and period; you can't conclude how many people searched, because Trends shows relative interest on a 0 to 100 scale, not search volumes.You find a small company's accounts at Companies House but no revenue figure. Is the filing useless?
No: many small companies file abridged or micro-entity accounts with little detail, so the gap is normal; the filing still confirms the legal entity, its officers and filing history, and you log the missing revenue as unknown rather than guessing it.An AI assistant gives you a confident PESTLE for your sector. What should you do before using any of it?
Check each point against a named source and mark it verified, wrong or unverified; only verified points go into the source log, because AI tools can state old, invented or non-UK facts with confidence.Maya's second implication starts from a finding: shoppers are comparing price per bag. What would make it a complete implication for Larkfield?
An answer to "so what for us?": something Larkfield might do, stop or watch, such as showing price per bag clearly and explaining what the price buys. It also needs a source-log row that supports the finding.
Resources & Further Practice
- ONS retail sales: the Office for National Statistics' monthly Retail sales, Great Britain bulletin (ons.gov.uk/businessindustryandtrade/retailindustry/bulletins/retailsales/latest), which reports the proportion of sales made online; quote the latest figure with its month.
- Companies House register: GOV.UK's free Find and update company information service (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk), to search a company's officers, filing history and accounts; the company, not Companies House, is responsible for what it files, so treat a filing as the company's own account of itself.
- How Google Trends works: Google's "FAQ about Google Trends data" in Trends Help (support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533), which explains why Trends shows relative interest on a 0 to 100 scale rather than search volumes.
- Digital marketplaces in depth: Chaffey, D., Ellis-Chadwick, F. and Abed-Rabbo, M. (2025) Digital Marketing, 9th edn, Harlow: Pearson, for the online marketplace, intermediaries and environment scanning.
- Your institution's AI policy: before using AI tools in assessed work, read your own university's or employer's current guidance; rules differ and change often.
- Further practice: keep your profile, marketplace map, source log, PESTLE, competitor snapshot and implications in the Marketing in Practice Progress Map and Topic 1 Workbook; they're gathered again in the strategic audit in Module 6.
Your Marketplace Scan
- What I made: my organisation profile, marketplace map, source log of at least six sources, PESTLE and competitor snapshot, and three implications, all saved in the Marketing in Practice Progress Map and Topic 1 Workbook.
- The thing I'd assumed about my organisation's market that the evidence changed, and the source that changed it.
- One source I'll keep watching through the course, and how often I'll check it.
- What I'll change about how I check claims, after the AI activity.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker in the Progress Map: not yet, with support, independently or could teach it. Note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- If you're at "not yet" or "with support", strengthen your weakest implication with one more source, rated in your source log, before moving on. If you're at "independently" or above, go on to the next topic; your research plan in Module 2 starts from what your source log already shows.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Business intelligence is a habit, not a report. Think of checking the weather forecast before a trip. You don't commission a study of the climate. You look at one or two sources you trust, notice what's changed since yesterday, and decide whether to pack a coat. If two forecasts disagree, you trust the one with the better track record, and you check again nearer the time.
Marketing works the same way. A quick, regular look at a few trusted sources beats one big document that's out of date by the time anyone reads it.
If the whole scan feels like too much, take a smaller step: one claim, one source, one "so what". Write down one thing you believe about your organisation's market. Find one source that supports or contradicts it, and note who published it and when. Then write one sentence starting "So for us, this means…". That's a complete piece of business intelligence. Do it three times and you have the implications this topic asks for.
The usual misconception is that more information is better. It isn't. A long PESTLE with no sources and no "so what" is weaker than three checked facts that change a decision.
Key terms in this module
- Digital marketplace
- Everywhere an organisation's customers, competitors and partners meet online: search, social platforms, marketplaces, review sites, apps and the organisation's own website.
- Business intelligence
- Gathering, checking and organising information about the market, customers and competitors so that marketing decisions rest on evidence.
- PESTLE
- A checklist for scanning the external environment: political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors.
- Secondary research
- Information someone else has already collected, such as official statistics, company accounts or published reports.
- Progress marker
- A plain statement of what you can now do after a topic, used to rate your own progress.
- Portfolio
- The single collection of work you build for one organisation across the whole course.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Customers, Buyer Behaviour and Research
Why it matters. Your organisation's customers rarely decide the way your organisation assumes. Finding out how they really decide is the quickest way to stop wasting money. In this topic you'll learn how people and businesses make buying decisions, then plan and run small, cheap, ethical research that tells you something you didn't know. You'll finish with a research plan, a handful of tested questions and three insight statements your organisation could act on.
Progress marker: I can plan and run small, ethical research and turn what I find into customer insight. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next part of your research plan in the Customer Research Planner. If you already have survey results or customer comments to make sense of, start with Lesson 2.4, then come back to Lesson 2.2 to see what your data can and can't show. If you have to write a survey this week, do Lesson 2.2 and then Lesson 2.3.
Customer Research Planner
Your research question, what you already know, your method, sample and questions, how you'll handle consent, and the insights you found, as one printable research plan.
2.1How Customers Decide
Most organisations describe their customers as they imagine them. Real decisions are messier, and the gap between the two is where marketing money gets wasted. Buyer behaviour is how people and organisations recognise a need, search, compare, buy and judge what they bought.
The classic way to describe it is the consumer decision process: a need (my coffee has run out), a search (what are my options?), evaluation (which suits me best?), the purchase, and what happens after purchase (was it worth it, will I buy again, will I tell anyone?). Treat it as a simplification, not a law. People skip stages, loop back, and make many buying decisions with almost no search at all.
That's because a lot of buying runs on habits and mental shortcuts. We buy the same brand because it worked last time, choose the option already ticked, or read a higher price as a sign of quality. Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011) describes fast, intuitive thinking alongside slower, deliberate thinking. You don't need a figure for how often each happens; you need to notice which one your customers are probably using when they buy from you.
Business buying adds people. A business purchase usually involves a decision-making unit: the user who will use the product, the buyer who places the order, the approver who signs it off, and influencers whose opinions count. In Larkfield Coffee Roasters, the fictional business this course follows, a café's decision to buy coffee involves the owner and the head barista. Market only to one of them and you can lose the sale to the other.
UK example: Tesco Clubcard. Tesco launched Clubcard in February 1995. It worked with dunnhumby, the data science firm founded by Edwina Dunn and Clive Humby, to analyse what members actually bought. The lesson for you is the principle, not the scale: what customers do (what they buy, when, how often) is often better evidence than what they say they'll do. Most organisations hold some behaviour data already, such as order histories, bookings or attendance, and asking questions works best alongside it.
When you sketch how your organisation's customers decide, mark each step as "known" (you have evidence) or "assumed" (you're guessing). The assumed steps are your research questions for the next lesson.
2.2Planning Research
Good research starts with a question, not a survey. A useful research question is narrow and tied to a decision: "Why do customers cancel in their first three months, so we can decide what to change?" is far better than "What do customers think of us?". If no decision would change whatever the answer, it isn't worth researching. Choosing which question is worth your time is a first piece of marketing leadership.
Secondary first. Before you ask anyone anything, check what's already known. In Module 1 you built a source log; now go back to it. Public reviews, social comments, complaints, sales records and published reports often answer half the question for free. Write down what they show and, just as important, the gaps they leave. Those gaps are what your own research is for.
Primary research is research you carry out yourself for your question. It comes in two broad kinds, qualitative and quantitative:
- Qualitative research explores reasons and meanings through words, for example interviews or open comments. It tells you why.
- Quantitative research measures how many or how much, for example a survey with closed questions. It tells you how common.
Most small projects use both: a few interviews to find the reasons, and a short survey to see how widespread they are.
Samples. You won't ask everyone, so you ask a sample. A small sample can still be useful if you say honestly what it can't show. Five interviews can reveal reasons you hadn't thought of, but they can't tell you what share of customers feel the same. A survey of your own customers tells you about them, not about the whole market. Write that limitation into your plan before you start, not after.
Consent and anonymity. People should know who is asking, why, what will happen to their answers, and that they can say no or stop at any time. Ask for no more personal data than you need, and report results so no one can be identified. The Market Research Society's Code of Conduct (revised 2023) sets the standard UK researchers follow. The legal rules on personal data return in depth in Module 5.
2.3Asking Good Questions
The wording of a question can decide the answer. Small changes make a big difference, so this lesson is about writing questions that let people tell you the truth.
Closed questions give a fixed set of answers (yes or no, a list, a rating scale). They are quick to answer and easy to count. Open questions ("What nearly stopped you ordering?") let people answer in their own words. They are slower to analyse but often surprise you. A good survey is mostly closed questions with one or two open ones. Rating scales need balanced ends, such as "very poor" to "very good", with a middle option.
Order matters. Start with easy, general questions, then move to the specific and the sensitive. Put personal questions, like age, at the end and only if you need them. Earlier questions can colour later ones, so ask about overall satisfaction before you ask about one feature.
Three faults spoil most first drafts: leading, double and vague questions.
- A leading question pushes people towards an answer: "How much do you love our new range?"
- A double question asks two things at once: "Was delivery fast and well packed?" Someone who got a fast, damaged parcel can't answer.
- A vague question means different things to different people: "Do you buy coffee regularly?" Weekly? Daily?
Interviews use an interview guide: five or six open questions in a sensible order, plus prompts such as "Tell me more about that" or "What happened next?". Ask about real past behaviour ("Tell me about the last time you...") rather than guesses about the future.
Piloting means trying your questions on one or two people before the real thing. Watch where they hesitate, re-read or ask what you mean. Every pause is a question to fix.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to draft a short survey for your organisation's research question from Lesson 2.2. Then go through it line by line and find every leading, double or vague question it wrote, rewriting each one. Finally, note what it missed about your customers: the AI doesn't know who they are, how they buy or what your source log showed. Keep both versions; the comparison is useful evidence of your judgement.
2.4From Data to Insight
Once the answers are in, resist the urge to report everything. Your job is to find what matters and what your organisation could do about it.
Start simple. For closed questions, count: how many people chose each answer, and out of how many? Always give the base ("39 of 96", not just a percentage), so readers can see how big the group was. For open comments and interviews, read everything once, then group similar comments into themes and count how many fall under each. Pick one or two short quotes that capture each theme in customers' own words, with no names attached.
A finding is not an insight. A finding is what the data says: "Most cancellations mention having too much coffee." Customer insight is a fresh, evidence-based understanding of why customers act as they do that the organisation can act on. It explains the finding and points to a decision.
A simple way to write one is the insight statement: "We noticed... (the finding), because... (the reason, from your evidence), so we could... (an action)." If you can't fill in the "because" from your evidence, you have a finding and a guess, and the guess is your next research question. If you can't fill in the "so we could", the insight isn't yet useful.
Say what it can't show. Every insight comes with limits. Who did you hear from, and who didn't you hear from? Did happy customers reply more than unhappy ones? Is it your customers or the whole market? Writing one honest line of limitations makes your insights more credible, not less.
Read the worked example later in this topic before you start the task: it takes Larkfield's survey all the way from a count to an insight statement. Then use the same steps on your own results or, if you can't survey anyone, on published reviews and comments about your organisation.
Why Larkfield's Subscribers Leave
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, wants to know why subscribers cancel, so Larkfield can decide what to change.
Secondary first. Before asking anyone, Maya reads Leo Grant's notes on themes in Larkfield's public reviews. They suggest themes but give no counts, so they can't say how common each reason is. That gap shapes the plan.
The plan. An online survey of customers and past customers, then 8 customer interviews to explore the reasons, and 5 interviews with café owners to cover the wholesale side. Each starts with a consent line saying who is asking, why, that taking part is optional and that answers will be reported anonymously.
Fixing the questions. Leo's first draft, and Maya's rewrite:
| First draft | Rewrite | What changed |
|---|---|---|
| "How much did you enjoy our freshly roasted coffee?" | "How would you rate the coffee you received?" (very poor to very good) | Removed the leading phrase that assumed enjoyment |
| "Did you cancel because of price or delivery?" | "What was the main reason you cancelled?" (list of reasons, plus "other, please say") | No longer forces a choice between two answers Maya guessed |
Maya pilots the survey with one person before sending it, and fixes any question they hesitate over.
The results. 412 people respond, 96 of them former subscribers. The most common reason for subscribing is freshness: coffee roasted days before it arrives. The most common reason for cancelling is coffee building up at home: 39 of the 96 former subscribers. The interviews explain why: a fixed schedule doesn't match how much people drink. The café interviews confirm that café decisions involve the owner and the head barista, a decision-making unit. The research also shows gift buying concentrated before Christmas.
The insight statement. "We noticed former subscribers cancel when coffee builds up, because a fixed schedule doesn't match how much they drink, so we could let subscribers skip, pause or change frequency in one click."
What it can't show. These are Larkfield's own customers, not the whole coffee market, and people who chose to reply may differ from those who didn't. Maya writes both limits into her plan.
Knowledge Check
A café chain's marketing only ever reaches its baristas, yet the order is placed by the operations manager and signed off by the finance director. What idea explains why this marketing may fail, and what would you change?
It ignores the decision-making unit: the baristas are users and perhaps influencers, but the buyer and the approver decide, so the marketing needs a message for each role, such as cost and reliability for the finance director.A competitor publishes a press release saying "9 out of 10 customers prefer our coffee". Using what you learned about judging sources in Module 1, what would you check before quoting it?
Who published it and why (the competitor has a clear interest), when it was done, and how they know: how many people were asked, who they were (probably its own customers), and the exact question, which may have been leading; without that, treat it as low reliability.Why should a research plan start with secondary research rather than a new survey?
What's already known (reviews, complaints, sales records, the source log) often answers part of the question for free, and it shows the real gaps, so your primary research can focus on what you genuinely don't know.A survey asks: "How satisfied were you with our quick and friendly delivery?" What is wrong with it, and how would you rewrite it?
It is leading (it assumes delivery was quick and friendly) and double (it asks about speed and friendliness at once), so ask two neutral questions, such as "How would you rate the speed of delivery?" and "How would you rate the delivery driver's manner?", each on a balanced scale.Eight interviews all mention confusing prices. Can you report that "most customers find our prices confusing"? Why or why not?
No: eight interviews can reveal a reason worth taking seriously, but they can't show how common it is across all customers, so report it as a theme from a small qualitative sample and test how widespread it is with a survey."Thirty of our 120 reviews mention late delivery." Is this a finding or an insight, and what would turn it into an insight?
It is a finding: it becomes an insight when you add an evidence-based "because" (why deliveries are late, or why lateness matters to these customers) and a "so we could" that points to an action the organisation can take.
Resources & Further Practice
- Research ethics: the Market Research Society's Code of Conduct (mrs.org.uk/standards/code_of_conduct, revised 2023) sets out what UK researchers must do on consent, honesty with participants and protecting their identity.
- Writing a questionnaire: the Market Research Society's Guidelines for Questionnaire Design (updated April 2024; mrs.org.uk/pdf/MRS%20Guidelines%20for%20Questionnaire%20Design.pdf) apply its code to wording, order and testing questions; use them to check your five questions.
- Interviews, consent and analysis: the GOV.UK Service Manual's user research guides (gov.uk/service-manual/user-research), including "Using in-depth interviews", "Getting informed consent for user research" and "Analyse a research session", are free, practical and written for beginners.
- Mental shortcuts: Kahneman, D. (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow, Allen Lane, explains fast, intuitive thinking and slower, deliberate thinking, with many examples of the shortcuts behind everyday decisions.
- Personal data in research: the Information Commissioner's Office (ico.org.uk) publishes guidance on UK GDPR for organisations; you'll use it properly in Module 5.
- Further practice: complete every section of the Customer Research Planner for one real research question, run the survey or the review analysis, and update your three insight statements when the results come in.
Your Research Plan and Insights
- What I did: my research plan, my five piloted questions and my three insight statements, saved in the Customer Research Planner.
- What surprised me: one thing customers did or said that my organisation hadn't assumed.
- The next question I'd research, and the decision it would inform.
- Rate yourself again on the progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. If you're at "not yet" or "with support", redo Lesson 2.4 with a fresh set of reviews before you move on.
- Choose what to do next: run the research for real now, or carry on to the next topic and add the findings to your plan when they come in.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
The usual stumbling block is thinking data is the same as insight. It isn't. "39 people said X" is a finding: it tells you what happened. Why they did it, and what you could do about it, is the insight.
Think of a doctor. A temperature reading is a finding. "You have an infection, so you need this treatment" is the diagnosis that leads to action. Research works the same way: the numbers are the readings, and the insight is the diagnosis.
Build one insight in three steps. First, pick one count from your results and write it as a plain sentence: "Of the 20 people who left a review, 8 mention slow replies to emails." Second, ask "why?" and answer it only from your evidence, such as what the reviews themselves say. Third, ask "so what could we do?" and write one action. Put the three parts together as "We noticed..., because..., so we could..." and you have an insight statement.
Key terms in this module
- Buyer behaviour
- How people and organisations recognise a need, search, compare, buy and judge what they bought.
- Customer insight
- A fresh, evidence-based understanding of why customers act as they do that the organisation can act on.
- Primary research
- Research you carry out yourself for a specific question, such as a survey or interviews.
- Qualitative research
- Research that explores reasons and meanings through words, for example interviews.
- Quantitative research
- Research that measures how many or how much, for example a survey with closed questions.
- Decision-making unit
- The people involved in a business purchase, such as the user, the buyer and the person who approves it.
- Leading question
- A question worded so that it pushes the respondent towards a particular answer.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Segmentation, Targeting and the Path to Purchase
Why it matters. Marketing to everyone means marketing to no one in particular. Choosing who you're for is the first real strategic decision you'll make for your organisation. In this topic you'll split your organisation's market into groups by what people need and do, choose which group to serve with evidence, describe a typical customer in that group honestly, and map how they move towards buying. Every later decision about channels, messages and measurement starts from here.
Progress marker: I can choose a target segment with evidence and map its path to purchase. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next part of your plan in the Segment and Path-to-Purchase Planner, and each depends on the one before. If your organisation already knows who it targets, start with Lesson 3.3 and check the evidence behind its choice afterwards in Lesson 3.2. If you need a customer journey for a campaign this week, read the worked example and then Lesson 3.4.
Segment and Path-to-Purchase Planner
Your segments and their evidence, your target segment and the reasons for choosing it, a persona, and the path to purchase with the touchpoints at each step, as one printable plan.
3.1Ways to Segment
Most organisations describe their market with one word: "students", "families", "small businesses". Market segmentation goes further. It divides a market into groups of customers with similar needs or behaviour, who respond to marketing in a similar way. Each group is a segment.
There are four common ways in, called bases for segmenting:
- Demographic: age, life stage, income, household. Easy to find, but weak at explaining why people buy.
- Geographic: where people live or work. It matters for delivery areas, local services and anything people travel to.
- Behavioural: what people do, such as how often they buy, how they use the product, which channel they buy through, and whether they come back.
- Needs-based: the benefit people want, or the job they're trying to get done.
Business markets use firmographics: sector, size (staff or turnover), location, and how the business buys. You met the decision-making unit in Module 2; a segment of businesses where the owner decides alone needs different marketing from one where a buying team decides.
Start from insight, not labels. The strongest segments come from needs and behaviour, usually combined with one or two other bases to find and reach people. Go back to the insight statements you wrote in topic 2. Where customers want clearly different things, you may have found the edges of a segment. A label such as "Gen Z" lumps together people who want very different things.
A useful segment passes four tests. Its needs differ from the other segments. You can find and reach its members. It's big enough to matter (in words, if you have no figures). And you have evidence it exists, not just a hunch.
UK example: Gymshark. Gymshark says it began in 2012 in a garage in Birmingham. CNBC reported in May 2023 that, with no advertising budget, founder Ben Francis and co-founder Lewis Morgan gave free products to popular fitness YouTubers at a bodybuilding expo in 2013, and some wore the clothing on their channels. The segment was defined by behaviour and needs: people who trained seriously and watched fitness creators. Age alone would have missed the point, and so would "people who exercise".
3.2Choosing Your Target
Once you have segments, you have to choose. Targeting means choosing which segments to serve, and how many, based on how attractive each one is and how well your organisation can win it.
Attractiveness asks whether a segment is worth having:
- Size: are there enough of these customers to matter?
- Growth: is the group getting bigger or smaller?
- Reachability: can you find them, and are there places where they gather or look?
- Competition: who already serves them well, and could you offer something better?
Fit asks whether your organisation can win it. What is it already good at? What does it already own, such as a reputation, a location, skills or a product? A large, growing segment is no use if a competitor serves it better and you have nothing different to offer.
Describe each score in words and say what evidence it rests on: "growing, judging by the rise in local brewing classes" is more honest than a made-up number. If you do have figures, give their source.
There are three broad approaches. Focus on one segment, and do it well. Serve several segments with one offer. Or take a differentiated approach: a different offer or message for each segment you choose. Small organisations usually start with one or two, because every extra segment costs money and attention.
Say why not. A good targeting decision explains what you've chosen not to do. Writing one reason for each rejected segment stops the team drifting back to "everyone", and it shows a manager you weighed the alternatives.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to suggest segments for your organisation, describing what it sells and to whom. Then test each suggestion against your own evidence from topic 2 and your source log: keep it, change it or reject it, and write one reason each time. Watch for segments the AI invented from a label, and for any figures it gives without a source. Keep the AI's list and your verdicts; they show your judgement.
3.3Personas Without Stereotypes
A persona is a short, evidence-based portrait of a typical customer in a target segment. It gives a team one person to picture when it writes an email, designs a page or chooses a channel. "Would this help Jordan?" is an easier question than "would this help the segment?"
A persona is only as good as its evidence. Build it from your research in Module 2: survey answers, interviews, reviews, order data, comments on social media. Every detail should earn its place by changing a decision. Where they look for advice matters; their favourite colour probably doesn't.
A useful persona covers:
- Name and a short situation: their circumstances as they relate to what you sell.
- Needs: what they want from the product, and what puts them off.
- What they read, watch and listen to: the places your organisation could meet them.
- Evidence: where each detail came from.
The traps. The first is invented detail. Teams add a job, a dog and a hobby to make the persona feel real, then start making decisions based on things nobody checked. The second is the cliché: assumptions based on age or gender, such as "older people don't shop online" or "women buy the gifts". These are stereotypes, not evidence, and they can lead you to ignore customers who don't fit.
Test each detail by asking "how do we know?". If the answer is "we don't", cut it, or mark it as an assumption to research. Then give the persona a plainly fictional name, and say it's illustrative. A persona stands for a group; it isn't one real customer, so never use a real person's name or details.
One persona per target segment is enough to start. If your organisation targets two segments, write the second persona later, once the first has proved useful.
3.4The Path to Purchase
The path to purchase is the steps a customer moves through from first noticing a need to buying and buying again, including where they look and who influences them. It builds on the decision process from Module 2, but adds the places your organisation can show up.
This topic uses five stages:
- Trigger: something starts the need, such as running out, a life change or seeing a friend's purchase.
- Search: they look for options, online or by asking people.
- Compare: they weigh up a shortlist on what matters to them.
- Buy: they choose, often trying something small first.
- After purchase: they use it, judge it, and decide whether to buy again and tell others.
At each stage, list the touchpoints: any point where a customer meets the organisation or hears about it, online or offline. A search result, a review, a shop shelf, an email and a delivery box are all touchpoints. Then list the influences: friends, reviews, creators, staff, price comparison. Some touchpoints belong to you, some don't, and the ones you don't control often matter most.
The customer funnel is a simpler model of the same idea: awareness, consideration, purchase and loyalty. It narrows because fewer people reach each stage. Its value is that it suggests a different goal at each stage: get noticed, get considered, get chosen, get chosen again. You'll turn those goals into measures with baselines in Module 6. Real paths loop and skip, so treat the funnel as a planning aid, not a description of how people behave.
Map the path for your persona, not for "customers" in general. Read the worked example later in this topic before you start the task: it maps Larkfield's persona, Jordan, stage by stage. Then do the same for your organisation, marking any touchpoint you've assumed rather than seen in your evidence.
Who Larkfield Is For, and Jordan's Path
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and its customers and persona are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, starts from the topic 2 research and Leo Grant's marketplace map.
Four segments, each with evidence.
| Segment | Needs and behaviour | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Home Brew Enthusiasts | Own a grinder or brewing kit; care about origin and roast date | Freshness is the top reason for subscribing; more home brewing kit (Maya's first implication) |
| Everyday Convenience Drinkers | Want good coffee without fuss; price-sensitive | Shoppers comparing price per bag (Maya's second implication) |
| Gift Buyers | Buy for others, seasonally | Gift buying concentrated before Christmas |
| Independent Cafés | Business customers | The owner and head barista decide together |
Choosing. Maya scores each in words. Home Brew Enthusiasts are reachable through brewing videos and search, and they want the freshness Larkfield is built on: strong fit. Gift Buyers matter, but only in one season.
- Primary target: Home Brew Enthusiasts, for subscriptions.
- Secondary target: Gift Buyers, for Christmas.
- Not Everyday Convenience Drinkers: they're price-sensitive and compete with supermarket coffee, where Larkfield's freshness counts for less.
- Not Independent Cafés: they're a wholesale matter, not part of this growth plan.
The persona. "Jordan", 29, Nottingham, bought a hand grinder last year, watches brewing videos and reads roast dates. Jordan is illustrative, not a real person.
Jordan's path to purchase.
| Stage | What happens | Touchpoints and influences |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Current coffee runs out, or new kit arrives | At home, before Larkfield is in the picture |
| Search | Searches "coffee subscription"; watches brewing videos; reads reviews | Search results, YouTube brewing videos, review sites |
| Compare | Weighs roast date, origin and price per bag | Larkfield's own site, review sites |
| Buy | Orders a trial bag, then subscribes | Larkfield's own online shop |
| After purchase | Buys again and recommends | Word of mouth, reviews, Instagram and Facebook |
Each stage now has a goal: be found when the coffee runs out, win the comparison on freshness, make the trial easy, and keep Jordan subscribing.
Knowledge Check
A gym describes its target market as "18 to 35-year-olds". Why is this weak segmentation, and what would you do instead?
Age is a label, not a need: people of the same age join for very different reasons, so segment by needs and behaviour (for example "training for an event" or "wants a quiet place to exercise after work") and use age only to help find and reach them.A segment is large and growing, but two national competitors already serve it well and your organisation has nothing different to offer. Should you target it?
Probably not: attractiveness is only half the decision, and without fit (a strength or a different offer the segment values) you'd be paying to compete where you're likely to lose, so say why not and choose a segment you can win.In Module 2 you met the decision process: need, search, evaluation, purchase and after purchase. A customer reads a review site while choosing between two brands. Which stage of the path to purchase is that, and could the same site appear at another stage?
It's the compare stage (evaluation in the decision process); the same review site can also be a search touchpoint, where people first find options, and an after-purchase one, where customers leave their own reviews.A persona says: "Priya, 42, mother of two, loves baking and drives an estate car." What's wrong with it, and how would you fix it?
It's mostly invented detail and cliché, and none of it is tied to evidence or helps a decision, so keep only details your research supports (needs, behaviour, where they look) and note the source of each.Why write down a reason for every segment you didn't choose?
It shows you weighed the alternatives, gives a manager something to challenge, and stops the team drifting back to targeting everyone when a new idea comes along.What is the customer funnel useful for, and what is its main limitation?
It suggests a different goal at each stage (get noticed, considered, chosen and chosen again) that you can later measure, but real customers loop back and skip stages, so treat it as a planning aid, not a description of behaviour.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example: Gymshark's own "About us" page (gymshark.com) says the company began in 2012 in a garage in Birmingham; CNBC's profile of Ben Francis by Megan Sauer (26 May 2023) describes the 2013 bodybuilding expo where the founders gave products to fitness YouTubers.
- Personas from research: the GOV.UK Service Manual's guide "Learning about users and their needs" (gov.uk/service-manual/user-research) explains how to find and write user needs, and describes personas as profiles of groups of users with similar behaviour and needs.
- Evidence for consumer segments: the Office for National Statistics publishes Census 2021 data (ons.gov.uk/census) on age, households and other characteristics by local area, useful for checking whether a geographic or demographic segment is as big as you think.
- Evidence for business segments: Companies House (find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk) lists each registered company's address and nature of business (SIC code), a free starting point for firmographic segments.
- Textbook reading: Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G., Principles of Marketing (Pearson, any recent edition), has a full chapter on segmentation, targeting and positioning, with more bases and targeting approaches than this topic covers.
- Further practice: complete every section of the Segment and Path-to-Purchase Planner for your organisation, then show your target and persona to one colleague or customer and ask "does this sound like anyone you know?"
Your Target and Its Path
- What I did: my segments, my target, my persona and my path to purchase, saved in the Segment and Path-to-Purchase Planner.
- My target, and why not the others: one line for the segment I chose and one for each I rejected.
- What I'd test to check I'm right: one piece of evidence that would change my choice if it came out differently.
- Rate yourself again on the progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. If you're at "not yet" or "with support", redo the Target section of the Segment and Path-to-Purchase Planner using the worked example's four segments as a model before you move on.
- Choose what to do next: deepen your persona with one short interview with a real customer in your target segment, or move on and write a proposition for this target in Module 4.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
The usual stumbling block is segmenting by label instead of by need. Two 30-year-olds can want completely different things from the same shop: one wants it quick and cheap, the other wants advice and will pay for it. Put them in one segment and your message suits neither.
Now think of a running club. Its members might be 19 or 65, students or retired, living across the city. Many joined for the same reason: they wanted company to keep them running. That shared need is the segment. Age and postcode only help you find more people like them.
So try it in one small step. Pick three real customers of your organisation, or three reviewers. For each, write one line: "They came to us because...". Group the ones whose reasons match. That group, described by its reason, is your first segment.
Key terms in this module
- Market segmentation
- Dividing a market into groups of customers with similar needs or behaviour who respond to marketing in a similar way.
- Targeting
- Choosing which segments to serve, and how many, based on their attractiveness and the organisation's ability to win them.
- Path to purchase
- The steps a customer moves through from first noticing a need to buying and buying again, including where they look and who influences them.
- Customer funnel
- A simple model of the stages from awareness to consideration to purchase and loyalty, used to set goals at each stage.
- Touchpoint
- Any point where a customer meets the organisation or hears about it, online or offline.
- Persona
- A short, evidence-based portrait of a typical customer in a target segment.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Proposition, the 7Ps, Brand and Portfolio
Why it matters. Customers don't buy what you sell; they buy what it does for them. If your price, your website or your people say something different from your promise, they believe the evidence, not the promise. In this topic you'll turn the target customer you chose in Module 3 into a reason for that customer to choose your organisation. Then you'll check that every part of the offer backs that reason up. You'll finish with a value proposition, a positioning statement, one line for each of the 7Ps with its gaps marked, and a map of your organisation's brand and portfolio.
Progress marker: I can write a value proposition and check every one of the 7Ps delivers it. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Proposition and 7Ps Planner, and Lesson 4.3 needs the proposition from Lesson 4.1. If you already have a proposition and want to test it, read the worked example and start at Lesson 4.3. If your organisation is about to launch a new product or service, read Lesson 4.4 early, then come back.
Proposition and 7Ps Planner
Your value proposition, positioning statement, a line for each of the 7Ps with any gaps, and your brand and portfolio map, as one printable plan.
4.1The Value Proposition
You met your target segment in Module 3; now you give that customer a reason to choose your organisation. That reason is the value proposition: a clear statement of the benefit a target customer gets, why it matters to them and why your organisation delivers it better than the alternatives.
Benefits, not features. A feature is what the product has or does: "a 2,000mAh battery", "open until 10pm". A benefit is what that means for the customer: "your phone lasts the whole festival", "you can shop after your late shift". Customers buy benefits. To get from one to the other, ask "so what?" until you reach something the customer would care about.
Jobs, pains and gains. Value Proposition Design (Osterwalder, Pigneur, Bernarda and Smith, 2014) gives three useful prompts. Jobs are what the customer is trying to get done. Pains are what annoys them or gets in the way. Gains are what would delight them. Fill each one from your topic 2 research, not from guesses. If a pain has no evidence behind it, mark it "assumed".
The alternatives. Customers always have a choice: a competitor, a different kind of product, making do, or doing nothing at all. "Doing nothing" is often the strongest rival. Name the alternatives your target customer really considers, in their words.
The proposition statement. Keep it to one or two sentences a customer would recognise. A simple frame: for (target), (offer) gives (main benefit), because (proof only you can offer). The proof matters most. Without it, you have a slogan.
UK example: Greggs and the vegan sausage roll. Greggs launched a vegan sausage roll on 3 January 2019, timed for Veganuary. A brand known for sausage rolls now offered its best-known product to people who don't eat meat. In its preliminary results on 7 March 2019, Greggs reported company-managed shop like-for-like sales up 9.6% in the seven weeks to 16 February 2019, "helped in part by publicity surrounding launch of the vegan-friendly sausage roll". Notice what Greggs claimed and what it didn't: it said the launch helped, not that it caused all the growth. The lesson for you is the principle: the proposition stayed familiar (a Greggs sausage roll) while the product widened who it was for.
Test your draft on the target from topic 3. Would that customer, in particular, recognise their own job, pain or gain in it? If it would suit anyone, it isn't yet written for them.
4.2Positioning Against the Alternatives
A proposition says what you offer. Positioning is the place you want that offer to hold in the target customer's mind, compared with the alternatives. You don't fully control it: customers decide where you sit. But you can choose where to aim, and make every message point the same way.
The positioning statement. A widely used template, popularised by Geoffrey Moore in Crossing the Chasm (1991), runs in five parts:
- For (the target customer)
- who (their need or problem)
- our offer is (what it is, in plain words)
- that (the main benefit)
- unlike (the main alternative), (what makes yours different).
It is an internal tool, not an advert. Nobody outside the organisation needs to see it, but everyone inside should be able to say it.
Choosing the alternatives. Use the ones the customer really weighs up, from your topic 2 research and the competitor snapshot in Module 1. If you describe real competitors, describe them fairly and only with facts you can check.
The positioning map. Draw two lines crossing at the middle, one for each attribute customers care about, such as price and convenience, or freshness and choice. Then place your organisation and each alternative on the map. Two rules keep it honest:
- Choose attributes from your research, not ones that happen to flatter you.
- Place the alternatives as the customer sees them, not as you'd like them to be.
Gaps on the map. An empty corner can be an opportunity. It can also be empty because nobody wants that combination. Before you claim it, check your evidence says customers value it.
Claims you can back up. Every word in the "that" and "unlike" lines is a claim. If your organisation can't prove it today, either change the offer or change the words. Claims return in depth in Module 5, where you'll check them against the advertising rules.
When you have a statement and a map, read them side by side. If the map shows you sitting among the alternatives rather than apart from them, the "unlike" line needs work.
4.3The 7Ps as a Consistency Check
You now have a proposition. The marketing mix is everything the organisation controls that shapes what the customer actually gets. The original four Ps (product, price, place, promotion) were extended for services by Booms and Bitner (1981), who added people, process and physical evidence. Together they are the 7Ps.
Learners often treat the 7Ps as a form to fill in, one box at a time. Here they do a different job: they test one proposition. Customers judge a promise by the evidence around it. If the advert says "premium" and the website looks careless, they believe the website.
One question for every P. Ask each one: does this deliver the proposition?
| P | The question to ask |
|---|---|
| Product | Does what we sell give the benefit we promise? |
| Price | Does the price fit the promise and the target customer? |
| Place | Can the target customer get it where and when they expect? |
| Promotion | Does every message say the same thing? |
| People | Do the people customers meet live up to it? |
| Process | Do the steps to buy and use it keep the promise? |
| Physical evidence | What can customers see or hold that proves it? |
Physical evidence means the tangible signs that let customers judge a service before or after they use it: packaging, a website, a receipt, a uniform.
Gaps and contradictions. A gap is a P that doesn't help the promise. A contradiction is worse: a P that says the opposite, such as a "fast" service with a slow checkout. Mark both. Then pick the one that would hurt most if a customer noticed it.
Read the worked example later in this topic before you start. It takes Larkfield Coffee Roasters, the course's fictional roaster, through all seven Ps.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant for five alternative value propositions for your organisation's target segment. Then score each one against your own customer evidence from topic 2: does it match a job, pain or gain your research found? Can your organisation prove it today? Which P would contradict it? Write down which proposition survives and why. The AI writes fluent propositions quickly, but it doesn't know your customers. Your evidence is the judge.
When you write your own seven lines, write what is true today, not what you plan. The gaps are your organisation's to-do list.
4.4Brand and Portfolio
Your proposition belongs to one product or service. Most organisations offer several, under one name or many. This lesson steps back to see the whole picture.
Brand architecture is how an organisation's brands and sub-brands relate to each other. David Aaker and Erich Joachimsthaler (Brand Leadership, 2000) describe a spectrum. In outline, there are three common choices:
- A master brand: one name across everything, with products described rather than separately branded. Each launch borrows the master brand's trust, and each mistake can damage it.
- Endorsed brands: a product has its own name, backed by the parent's ("X, from Y"). It can reach a different audience while keeping some trust.
- Separate brands: each product stands alone and customers may not know who owns it. Unilever, for example, sells many brands under their own names. It costs more to build each brand, but a problem in one rarely spreads.
The product portfolio is the full set of products or services an organisation offers, and how they work together. Give each item a role:
- Core earners: the steady products that bring in most of the money.
- Growth products: newer lines the organisation is investing in.
- Seasonal products: offers for a time of year, such as Christmas.
- Gateway products: a low-risk first purchase, such as a sample or trial, that leads to bigger ones.
Roles help you decide where marketing money and attention go, and spot a portfolio leaning too hard on one product.
Stretch or strain. A new product can stretch a brand into new customers, as Greggs' vegan sausage roll did in Lesson 4.1. It can also strain it, if the new product contradicts what the brand stands for. Ask two questions of any new product: does it fit the master brand's promise, and could a failure here damage the rest?
You don't need inside information for this task. A website's menus, a price list and an "about us" page usually show the architecture and most of the portfolio. Where you're guessing a product's role, say so.
Larkfield's Proposition and 7Ps Check
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, starts from two things the course has already found: the target is Home Brew Enthusiasts, and the most common reason customers subscribe is freshness.
The proposition. Maya climbs from the feature (Larkfield roasts its coffee in Derby) to the benefit Home Brew Enthusiasts told the research they want: fresh coffee. She writes: "Roasted in Derby, at your door within three days of roasting." The proof is checkable: a place and a number of days.
The positioning statement. "For Home Brew Enthusiasts who read roast dates and care about origin, Larkfield is a coffee subscription that arrives within three days of roasting. Unlike national subscription brands and supermarket coffee, it comes from one roaster in Derby, with the roast date on every bag."
The 7Ps check. Maya asks each P one question: does it deliver the proposition?
| P | Larkfield today | Delivers it? |
|---|---|---|
| Product | Roasted coffee, beans or ground, in 250g bags | Yes |
| Price | £9.50 a bag one-off; £8.50 on subscription; the standard subscription is 2 bags a month, £17.00 | Yes: the reward is for subscribing, not for being cheapest |
| Place | Own online shop, free UK delivery on subscriptions | Yes |
| Promotion | The website's claims, including "100% recyclable packaging" | Gap: not yet checked |
| People | The roaster signs each bag | Yes |
| Process | Roast to door in three days | Yes: this is the promise |
| Physical evidence | The roast date printed on every bag | Yes: customers can see the proof |
Six Ps back the promise. The packaging line is different: it's a claim Larkfield must be able to prove, and nobody has checked it. Maya marks it as the first thing to fix and passes it to Module 5.
Brand and portfolio. Everything sits under one master brand, "Larkfield". The core range of six coffees is the core earner. Seasonal single origins and gift boxes are seasonal, and the gift boxes serve the secondary target, Gift Buyers, at Christmas. A one-off bag acts as the gateway to a subscription. Larkfield Wholesale serves cafés. Because every product carries one name, a broken freshness promise anywhere would damage all of them.
Knowledge Check
A broadband company's proposition reads: "Full-fibre speeds of up to 900Mbps." What is wrong with it as a value proposition, and how would you improve it?
It states a feature, not a benefit: ask "so what?" until you reach what the target customer cares about, such as "the whole household can stream and work at once without it slowing down", and keep the speed as the proof.You chose a target segment in Module 3. A gym has chosen night-shift workers as its target segment, but its new proposition says: "Great-value fitness for everyone." Is it written for that target, and what would you change?
No: "for everyone" ignores the target's particular jobs and pains, so rewrite it around what night-shift workers need, such as being able to train at 3am after a shift, with proof like round-the-clock opening.A café draws a positioning map with "friendliness" and "quality of cakes" as its two axes, because that's where it thinks it beats everyone. What is the problem?
The axes should come from what customers say they care about in your research, not from what flatters you, and the alternatives should be placed as customers see them; otherwise the map shows a gap that may not exist.A restaurant promises "a relaxed evening out", but tables can only be booked by phone, calls often go unanswered, and staff ask diners to leave after 90 minutes. Which of the 7Ps contradict the proposition, and which would you fix first?
Process (the booking and the time limit) and people (staff hurrying diners) both contradict it; fix the one customers feel most, probably being hurried out, because it breaks the promise at the moment the customer is judging it.An accountancy firm sells advice, not a physical product. What could count as its physical evidence, and why does it matter?
Its website, office, letters, reports, invoices and the way its staff present themselves: customers can't see advice before they buy, so they judge the firm's quality from these tangible signs.A well-loved sandwich chain with one master brand plans to launch a cheap frozen ready-meal range under the same name. What should it weigh up?
Whether the new range fits the master brand's promise and its customers, and whether a failure could damage every product carrying the name; if the fit is weak, an endorsed or separate brand would protect the core.
Resources & Further Practice
- Jobs, pains and gains: Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Bernarda, G. and Smith, A. (2014) Value Proposition Design, Wiley, sets out the Value Proposition Canvas; Strategyzer's page "How to use the Value Proposition Canvas" (strategyzer.com/library) introduces it, with common pitfalls.
- The 7Ps: Booms, B.H. and Bitner, M.J. (1981) "Marketing strategies and organization structures for service firms", in Donnelly, J.H. and George, W.R. (eds) Marketing of Services, American Marketing Association, is where people, process and physical evidence were added to the mix.
- Positioning statements: Moore, G.A. (1991) Crossing the Chasm, HarperBusiness, gives the "for, who, that, unlike" positioning template, written as a short statement a whole team can repeat.
- Brand architecture: Aaker, D.A. and Joachimsthaler, E. (2000) Brand Leadership, Free Press, describes the brand relationship spectrum from one master brand to separate brands.
- The UK example at source: Greggs plc's preliminary results for the 52 weeks ended 29 December 2018, published on 7 March 2019 and archived on the London Stock Exchange's news service, show exactly what Greggs said about the vegan sausage roll; read company statements before press summaries.
- Further practice: complete every section of the Proposition and 7Ps Planner for your organisation, then repeat the 7Ps check for a second product or service in its portfolio and compare the gaps.
Your Proposition and Its Evidence
- My proposition, my positioning statement and my seven lines, saved in the Proposition and 7Ps Planner.
- The P that contradicts my proposition most, and why a customer would notice it.
- What I'd fix first, and who in my organisation would need to agree.
- Rate yourself again on the progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. If you're at "not yet", go back to Lesson 4.1 and climb the "so what?" ladder for three features. If you're at "with support", redo the AI activity in Lesson 4.3 with a friend or colleague scoring the propositions alongside you.
- Choose what to do next: test your proposition on two customers from your target segment (does each recognise themselves in it?), or move on to the next topic and test it later.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
The usual stumbling block is describing what you sell instead of what it does for the customer. Try the "so what?" ladder.
Start with one plain feature at the bottom rung, then keep asking "so what?" and write each answer on the rung above. Stop when you reach something the customer would say out loud.
For a gym: "We open at 5.30am." So what? "You can train before work." So what? "You don't have to give up your evenings with your family." That top rung is the benefit, and it's the one to put in your proposition. The bottom rung becomes the proof.
If you get stuck on a rung, the customer probably doesn't care about that feature. Pick a different one and climb again. Do this for three features and you'll usually find the proposition hiding in one of them.
Key terms in this module
- Value proposition
- A clear statement of the benefit a target customer gets, why it matters to them and why this organisation delivers it better than the alternatives.
- 7Ps
- The extended marketing mix: product, price, place, promotion, people, process and physical evidence.
- Positioning
- The place an organisation wants its offer to hold in the target customer's mind, relative to the alternatives.
- Brand architecture
- How an organisation's brands and sub-brands relate to each other, for example one master brand across everything or separate brands for each product.
- Product portfolio
- The full set of products or services an organisation offers, and how they work together.
- Physical evidence
- The tangible signs that let customers judge a service before or after they use it, such as packaging, a website or a receipt.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Regulation, Data Protection and Ethics in Marketing
Why it matters. One untrue claim or one unlawful email can undo years of trust, and the regulators now have more power to act. Knowing the rules is part of the job, not someone else's job. In this topic you'll check your organisation's claims, sign-up forms, emails, reviews and prices against the main UK rules, then go a step further and ask what's legal but still not right. You'll finish with a completed compliance and ethics checklist and a fix list your organisation could act on.
Not legal advice. This topic gives general information about UK rules as they stood in November 2026. The rules and the guidance on them change often, so check anything that matters against the regulator's current guidance (the ASA, the ICO and the CMA), and ask a qualified adviser before relying on it for a real decision.
Progress marker: I can check my organisation's marketing against UK rules and spot what's legal but not right. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one fills a group of the Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist, and the audit in Lesson 5.4 draws on all three before it. If you're writing ad copy or a product page this week, start with Lesson 5.1. If you're about to build a sign-up form or send an email campaign, start with Lesson 5.2.
Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist
Audit your organisation's claims, consent, data use, consumer-law practices and use of AI against the UK rules, and get a prioritised list of what to fix first.
5.1Honest Claims and the Advertising Rules
Every claim your organisation makes is covered by rules, whether it's on a poster, a product page, a social post or an email. In the UK, most non-broadcast marketing follows the CAP Code, written by the Committee of Advertising Practice and enforced by the ASA, the Advertising Standards Authority. TV and radio adverts have a sister code. The ASA can't fine anyone, but it can stop an advert running, and its rulings are published with the organisation's name on them.
Three rules do most of the work:
- Don't mislead. Marketing must not materially mislead, or be likely to (rule 3.1).
- Don't mislead by leaving things out. Omitting material information can mislead just as much (rule 3.3).
- Hold the evidence first. Before you make a claim that can be objectively checked, you must hold documentary evidence for it (rule 3.7). That evidence is called substantiation.
"The UK's freshest coffee" can be checked, so it needs evidence. Obvious exaggeration that nobody would take literally, called puffery, usually doesn't. The ASA judges how a typical customer would read the claim, not what you meant.
Environmental claims get extra scrutiny. Section 11 of the CAP Code says the basis of an environmental claim must be clear, and unqualified claims can mislead if they leave out significant information. The CMA's Green Claims Code (September 2021) says the same for consumer law: claims must be truthful, clear, complete, fair in any comparison, consider the product's whole life, and be backed by evidence. Green claims that are misleading, vague or unproven are called greenwashing.
UK example: HSBC. On 19 October 2022 the ASA ruled on two HSBC bus-stop posters seen in Bristol and London in October 2021, before the COP26 climate summit. One said HSBC was "aiming to provide up to $1 trillion in financing and investment globally" to help clients move to net zero; the other said it was helping to plant 2 million trees in the UK. The problem was what the posters left out: the bank's financing of businesses with notable greenhouse gas emissions. The ASA "concluded that the ads omitted material information and were therefore misleading", and they must not appear again in that form. A claim can be true and still mislead.
Where your work goes. The Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist finds the issues. Keep your fix list (issue, fix, owner, by when) in your portfolio document: you'll copy it into the Compliance fixes section of the Strategic Audit Builder in Module 6. The worked example later in this topic shows a full audit; read it before the task in Lesson 5.4.
5.2Personal Data, Consent and PECR
You met consent in Module 2, when you asked people to take part in research. Now it returns for marketing, where two sets of rules apply.
UK GDPR, with the Data Protection Act 2018, covers personal data: anything that identifies a living person, such as a name, an email address or an order history. Its principles, in plain English: be lawful, fair and open; use data only for the purpose you collected it for; collect no more than you need; keep it accurate; don't keep it longer than you need; keep it secure; and be able to show you've done all this.
You also need a lawful basis for each use. There are six. The two that matter most in marketing are consent (the person has clearly agreed) and legitimate interests (a use people would reasonably expect, which you've weighed against their rights). A privacy notice tells people in plain words what you collect, why, and how to object.
PECR, the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, adds rules for marketing by email, text and phone, and for cookies. To send marketing emails or texts to individuals you generally need consent. Valid consent is freely given, specific, informed and unambiguous: the person takes a clear action, such as ticking an empty box. A pre-ticked box isn't consent, and nor is silence.
In January 2026 the ICO, the UK's data regulator, fined ZMLUK Limited £105,000 for more than 67 million marketing emails. People had been shown 361 "partner" companies with no way to choose which could contact them, so their consent wasn't specific or informed.
The soft opt-in is the main exception. You can email or text your own customers about your own similar products if you got their details during a sale or while discussing one with them, and gave them a clear, simple chance to refuse then and in every message. Emailing business addresses follows different rules.
Cookies that aren't strictly necessary need consent, so a banner that sets them before anyone chooses is a problem.
What has changed. The Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 received Royal Assent on 19 June 2025, and the ICO says all its data protection provisions are now in force. For marketers: PECR fines can now reach UK GDPR levels (the higher of £17.5 million or 4% of worldwide turnover); some low-risk cookies, such as some used for statistics or to improve how a site works, can be set without consent; and charities can use a version of the soft opt-in for supporters. Check the ICO's current guidance for the conditions.
5.3Consumer Protection: Reviews, Prices and Subscriptions
You noted in Module 1 that fake reviews were banned from 6 April 2025. That ban is part of the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (the DMCC Act), now one of the main consumer laws a UK marketer needs to know. Its rules on unfair commercial practices took effect that day.
A commercial practice is unfair if it is likely to change what a typical customer decides, and it:
- misleads by what it says or shows (a misleading action);
- leaves out information the customer needs (a misleading omission);
- is aggressive, such as pressure or harassment; or
- falls below the standard of honest, careful behaviour expected of a trader.
On top of these sits a list of 32 practices that are banned in every case. Fake reviews are among them: writing or commissioning a fake review, or one that hides that the reviewer was paid or given something in return. Publishing genuine reviews in a misleading way, such as showing only the good ones, is also caught. Asking every customer for an honest review is fine; rewarding only five-star ones is not.
Drip pricing means showing a low headline price, then adding compulsory charges later in the buying process. The first price a customer sees must include every fixed charge they can't avoid. If a compulsory charge can't be worked out in advance, say how it will be worked out. Optional extras can come later, as long as they are clearly optional.
Who enforces. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) can now decide for itself that consumer law has been broken, without going to court first, and fine a business up to £300,000 or 10% of its global turnover, whichever is higher. Trading Standards also enforce consumer law.
Subscriptions: what's expected. The DMCC Act also creates new rules for subscription contracts. They are not yet in force. The government's draft guidance on GOV.UK (October 2026) says they are expected to apply to subscriptions taken out from 1 January 2027, if Parliament approves the regulations. They cover clear information before someone signs up, reminders, and an easy way to cancel. Check GOV.UK for the current date before you rely on it.
The test for every review, price and subscription is the same: would a typical customer, seeing what you show them, make the choice they'd make if they knew everything?
5.4Ethics Beyond the Law, and AI
The law sets the floor, not the ceiling. Something can be legal and still cost your organisation the trust it depends on. A useful test: would you be comfortable if customers saw exactly how you did it?
Four areas to check:
- Customers in vulnerable circumstances. Anyone can be vulnerable at times, through illness, money worries, grief or stress. Pressure tactics such as a false "only 2 left!" hurt them most, and fake urgency can also break consumer law. Adverts aimed at children have their own rules in the CAP Code.
- Inclusive images and words. Who appears in your marketing, and who never does? Since 14 June 2019 the CAP Code (rule 4.9) has banned gender stereotypes likely to cause harm or serious or widespread offence. Beyond the rule, ask whether all your customers would recognise themselves.
- Dark patterns. Design that steers people into choices they wouldn't otherwise make: a "No thanks, I don't like saving money" button, a hidden unsubscribe link, a cancellation that needs five screens or a phone call. Some are already unlawful; all of them cost trust.
- AI. Never paste personal data (names, emails, order histories) or confidential information into a public AI tool. Check every fact and claim an AI writes: you need the evidence, not the AI. Watch for bias, such as who an AI image shows by default. Be open about AI use where customers would expect to know, and follow your organisation's policy if it has one.
AI activity. Take one piece of your organisation's ad copy, such as a product description or a social post. Ask an AI assistant whether it meets the CAP Code, and which rules apply. Then check its answer against the Code itself on the ASA's website. Note where it was wrong, out of date or vague: a rule number that doesn't say what the AI claimed, or "it depends" with no reason. Keep the AI's answer and your notes in your portfolio; they show your judgement. Use public copy only.
The audit. Read the worked example first: it shows Larkfield's audit in full. Then work through every group of the Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist using your organisation's real public marketing: its website, emails you've received from it, its adverts and its reviews. Mark each item Done, Partly or Not yet. For every gap, add a line to your fix list: the issue, the fix, who should own it, and by when. If you can't check an item from outside, write it down as a question to ask someone inside.
Larkfield's Compliance and Ethics Audit
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional; its marketing is illustrative. Maya Collins and Leo Grant work through the checklist using Larkfield's website, checkout, emails and reviews. Most items are Done. Four are not.
| Issue | Rule | Why it matters | Fix | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| "100% recyclable packaging", but the bags are recyclable only through store drop-off points | CAP Code rules 3.1 and 3.3 and section 11; the Green Claims Code | Packaging claims are what customers now expect to see backed up (Maya's third implication in topic 1), so this is the claim most likely to be challenged | Qualify it, for example "recyclable at store drop-off points", or remove it | Maya |
| A pre-ticked box for marketing emails at checkout | UK GDPR and PECR: a pre-ticked box isn't consent | Emails sent without valid permission risk an ICO fine and annoy the people they're meant to win | An unticked box; for customers, the soft opt-in, with a clear chance to opt out at checkout and in every email | Leo |
| "Ethically sourced", with no stated meaning | CAP Code rule 3.7: hold the evidence first | Nobody can check a claim that doesn't say what it means | Keep it only if supplier documents support it, and say what it means | Maya |
| Cancelling a subscription needs a phone call | No specific rule yet, though barriers to leaving can count as an aggressive practice; the subscription rules are expected to require an easy way to cancel | A hard exit feels like a trap, and it leads to complaints | Make it possible online, in a few clicks | Leo |
Legal, but not right. No specific rule bans phone-only cancellation today, though the general ban on aggressive practices can catch barriers that make leaving hard. Maya still treats it as a fix now, not when the law arrives. Making it hard to leave keeps subscribers by friction, not value: a dark pattern customers remember. It fits Larkfield's research: in topic 2, 39 of the 96 former subscribers left because coffee built up at home, and the answer was to make changes easy.
What happens next. The four lines go into the fix list in Maya's portfolio document, each with an owner and a date, then into the Compliance fixes section of Larkfield's strategic audit.
Knowledge Check
A gym's website says it is "the cleanest gym in Derby". What does the CAP Code require before that claim goes live, and why?
It's an objective claim that customers could take literally and that can be checked, so the gym must hold documentary evidence for it first (substantiation, rule 3.7); without that evidence the claim is likely to mislead.HSBC's posters described real plans. Why did the ASA still rule them misleading?
Because they left out material information, the bank's financing of businesses with notable greenhouse gas emissions, which was likely to change how people understood the overall message: a claim can be true and still mislead by what it omits.In Module 2 you learned that research participants should know who is asking and why, and be free to say no. A sign-up form has a pre-ticked box for "news and offers". Using that idea, why isn't this valid consent?
Consent has to be informed and given by a clear action, just as research consent needs people to know what they're agreeing to and choose freely; with a pre-ticked box the person has done nothing, so under UK GDPR and PECR it isn't consent, and the box should start empty.A shop wants to email people who bought from it last month about a new range. When can it rely on the soft opt-in instead of consent?
Only if it got their details during the sale, the emails are about its own similar products, and it gave a clear, simple chance to refuse at the time and gives one in every email; if any of these is missing, it needs consent.A ticket website shows "£20" on the event page, then adds a compulsory £4 booking fee at checkout. What's the problem, and what's the fix?
It's drip pricing, an unfair practice under the DMCC Act 2024: a charge every buyer must pay belongs in the first price shown, so the event page should show £24 and list optional extras separately.A subscription box makes customers phone to cancel, and the new subscription rules aren't in force yet. Is that a good reason to leave it as it is?
No: a hard exit is a dark pattern that costs trust and causes complaints, and the expected rules are designed to make cancelling easy, so fixing it now is right for customers as well as ready for the law.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example: the ASA's ruling on HSBC UK Bank plc (19 October 2022), asa.org.uk/rulings/hsbc-uk-bank-plc-g21-1127656-hsbc-uk-bank-plc.html, quotes both posters and explains why leaving out financed emissions made them misleading under CAP Code rules 3.1, 3.3 and 11.1.
- The CAP Code and claims: the full CAP Code is free on the ASA's website (asa.org.uk, under Codes and rulings), and the ASA's advice page "Substantiation" (asa.org.uk/advice-online/substantiation.html) explains what evidence a claim needs; check rule numbers against the current edition.
- Green claims: the CMA's Green Claims Code (September 2021), published free on GOV.UK, sets out the principles for environmental claims, with examples; search GOV.UK for "Green Claims Code".
- Email, texts and cookies: the ICO's guidance on direct marketing and PECR (ico.org.uk, under For organisations) covers consent, the soft opt-in and cookies, and its page on the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 says what has changed for organisations.
- An ICO enforcement case: "Fines of £225,000 for nuisance marketing messages" (ICO, 20 January 2026), ico.org.uk/about-the-ico/media-centre/news-and-blogs/2026/01/fines-of-225-000-for-nuisance-marketing-messages/, explains why the consent behind 67 million emails wasn't valid.
- Consumer law: the CMA's guidance "Unfair commercial practices" (CMA207) on GOV.UK (gov.uk/government/publications/unfair-commercial-practices-cma207) covers misleading practices, fake reviews and drip pricing under the DMCC Act 2024, and GOV.UK's "Subscription contracts" page (gov.uk/government/publications/subscription-contracts) has the draft guidance on the rules to come.
- Inclusive advertising: the ASA's advice page "Harm and Offence: Gender stereotypes" (asa.org.uk/advice-online/harm-and-offence-gender-stereotypes.html) gives examples of what rule 4.9 does and doesn't allow.
- Further practice: complete every group of the Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist for your organisation, then audit one competitor's website the same way and compare the two fix lists.
Your Compliance Fixes
- What I did: my compliance and ethics checklist, completed in the Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist, and my fix list (issue, fix, owner, by when) in my portfolio document.
- What I learned: one thing that's legal but not right in my organisation's marketing, and why I think so.
- What I'll change: the one fix I'd push for first, and how I'd make the case to the person who owns it.
- Rate yourself again on the progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. If you're at "not yet" or "with support", reread the worked example and redo one group of the Marketing Compliance and Ethics Checklist, comparing each of your answers with Larkfield's table, before you move on.
- Choose what to do next: raise one fix with someone at your organisation this week, or carry your fix list straight into the strategic audit in Module 6.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
The rules can feel like a long list of codes and acts. In practice, almost all of them come back to three questions you can ask before any claim or message goes out.
- Is it true, and can I prove it? If you couldn't show the evidence tomorrow, don't say it, or say less.
- Did they agree to hear from us? If you can't point to the moment they said yes, or to a clear chance they had to say no, don't send it.
- Would I be comfortable if they saw how we did it? If the price, the review or the cancellation only works because customers can't see the whole picture, change it.
Try it on one thing your organisation published this week, such as a post, an email or a product page. Ask the three questions in order. Any "no" is your first fix, and you've just done a small audit.
Key terms in this module
- CAP Code
- The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing, written by the Committee of Advertising Practice and enforced by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).
- ASA
- The Advertising Standards Authority, the UK's independent regulator of advertising across all media.
- UK GDPR
- The UK General Data Protection Regulation, which with the Data Protection Act 2018 sets the rules for using personal data in the UK.
- PECR
- The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, which set extra rules for marketing by email, text and phone, and for cookies.
- Soft opt-in
- A PECR exception that lets an organisation email or text its own customers about similar products if it gave them a clear chance to opt out when it collected their details and in every message.
- Greenwashing
- Making environmental claims that are misleading, unclear or can't be backed up.
- Substantiation
- The evidence an advertiser must hold before making a claim that can be objectively checked.
Thanks. Good to hear.
KPIs, Analytics and Baselines
Why it matters. Every plan you write from here on will promise to improve something. If you don't know where it starts, you'll never know whether you did. Early in a marketing job you're often handed a dashboard full of numbers that don't connect to any objective. This topic teaches you to choose the few numbers that matter for your organisation, find where each one starts, and say honestly how sure you are. Then you'll bring the whole Foundation stage together in Milestone 1: a strategic audit of your organisation, ending with the three issues you'd act on first.
Progress marker: I can set KPIs with baselines and write a strategic audit of my organisation. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Strategic Audit Builder, and Lesson 6.5 needs the KPIs and baselines from the lessons before it. If you already have KPIs and want to check them, start at Lesson 6.3 and read the worked example first. If your manager has asked for a dashboard this week, read Lesson 6.4, then come back to Lesson 6.1.
Strategic Audit Builder
Milestone 1: your marketplace scan, customer insight, target segment, proposition, compliance fixes, KPIs with baselines and the three issues to act on, as one printable strategic audit.
6.1From Objectives to KPIs
You met the customer funnel in Module 3, with a goal for each stage: get noticed, get considered, get chosen, get chosen again. Now you turn those goals into numbers.
Objectives come first. A KPI (key performance indicator) is one of the few measures that show whether an objective is being met. So start with the objective, not the data. A useful objective is SMART: specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound. "Grow the business" is a wish. "Grow repeat bookings from 30% to 35% of all bookings by 31 March next year" is an objective you can measure.
The KPI tree. Draw it from the top down:
- The business goal, such as more revenue, more members or lower costs.
- The marketing objectives that drive it, such as more first-time customers or fewer customers leaving.
- The KPIs that show each objective moving.
Every KPI should link upwards to an objective. If it doesn't, it may be interesting, but it isn't a KPI for this goal.
One KPI per funnel stage. Pick one measure for each stage you care about. Awareness might be visits from new users. Consideration might be enquiries or product page views. Purchase might be the conversion rate. Loyalty might be the repeat rate or the churn rate.
Leading and lagging. A lagging indicator tells you what has already happened, such as revenue or customers lost. A leading indicator moves first and gives you warning, such as sign-ups started this week. You need both: lagging to judge results, leading to act in time.
Vanity metrics. A vanity metric looks impressive but doesn't show whether an objective is being met: followers, likes, impressions, total page views. Ask: "If this number doubled, what would we do differently?" If the answer is "nothing", leave it off.
UK example: the GOV.UK Service Manual. Its page "Data you must publish" (last updated 6 April 2021) tells government service teams they must publish data on four mandatory KPIs: cost per transaction, user satisfaction, completion rate and digital take-up. Four numbers cover what a service costs, whether users are happy, whether they finish the task and whether they choose the online route. That's the lesson for you: a small, balanced set, each tied to what the service is for.
6.2Analytics Essentials
You've chosen your KPIs. Now find out where each number comes from, and what could make it wrong.
How web analytics works. A small piece of code, called a tag, sits on each page of a website. When something happens, such as a page loading, a click, a sign-up or a purchase, the tag sends a record to the analytics tool. Each record is an event. Events from one visit are grouped into a session, which ends after a period of inactivity. A conversion is an event you've marked as one that matters. Google Analytics 4 (GA4) is one widely used example. It is built around events, and it now calls the events you mark as important "key events"; Google Ads still calls them conversions. Menus and names change, so learn the ideas, not the buttons.
Web analytics isn't the only source. Sales usually come from the shop or booking system, subscribers from the subscription system, opens from the email platform, and reach from each social platform's insights. For money, the order system is usually more reliable than analytics.
Campaign tags. UTM parameters are labels added to the end of a link you share: utm_source (who sent it, such as newsletter), utm_medium (the kind of channel, such as email) and utm_campaign (which campaign). Google's help page says the values are case sensitive, so "Email" and "email" show as two lines. Agree one naming list. Untagged links often show up as direct visits, and the campaign loses the credit.
Consent. You met cookie consent in Module 5; now see what it does to your numbers. The ICO's guidance on storage and access technologies, updated after the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, describes an exception for analytics used only to collect statistics to improve your own service: visitors must get clear information and an easy way to object. If the same data is used for advertising, consent is needed. Either way, visits from people who decline or object are usually missing or only estimated, so analytics usually undercounts. This isn't legal advice: check the ICO's current guidance.
Data quality problems to look for: pages with missing tags; bots and your own staff's visits; consent gaps; test or duplicate orders; and a definition that changed partway through the year.
AI activity. Give an AI assistant a simple chart or table with no personal data, such as twelve months of website visits, and ask it why a number changed. Then check each reason it gives against what else you know: campaigns you ran, the calendar, website changes, tracking changes. Mark each reason confirmed, possible or guessed. The AI can't see your calendar, so it often fills the gap with a confident guess.
6.3Setting Baselines
A baseline is the value of a measure before you change anything. It's the starting point for every target and the yardstick for every result. Read the worked example later in this topic before you start: it sets Larkfield's baselines and shows the "from the outside" method.
Start with last year. The best baseline is your organisation's own figures for the last full year, or the same period you'll later judge results on. Three rules keep it honest:
- Same period: compare like with like, a year with a year or a quarter with the same quarter.
- Same definition: if "active subscribers" means the average over the year, keep it that way; don't switch to the year-end figure.
- Check it adds up: orders times average order value should equal revenue, and revenue should match the accounts.
Seasonality. Many organisations have busy and quiet months. A garden centre peaks in spring; Larkfield's gift buying is concentrated before Christmas. So compare a campaign month with the same month last year, not the month before. Otherwise the season gets the credit, or the blame, for your marketing.
When there's no data. Many learners can't see internal figures, and that's fine. Estimate from public information instead: a free traffic-estimate tool, the number of public reviews, follower counts on each platform, or accounts filed at Companies House (larger companies show turnover; many small ones file shorter accounts without it). Write "estimate" beside the figure, with the source, the date and why you trust it. An honest estimate is useful. An unlabelled guess is dangerous, because the next person will treat it as fact.
How reliable is it? Use the same scale as your topic 1 source log:
- High: your organisation's own records, checked against another source.
- Medium: your own analytics with known gaps, or a well-documented public source.
- Low: outside tool estimates and figures worked out from clues.
A flat baseline matters too. If a number has been steady, that tells you what would probably happen if you did nothing different. You'll need that when you judge whether a campaign really worked, later in the course.
6.4Dashboards That Lead to Decisions
A dashboard is not a report of everything you can count. It's a single page that helps someone decide what to do next. Most dashboards fail because they show too much and nobody knows what any number is for.
Keep it short. Four to eight KPIs on one page, taken from your KPI tree. If someone asks for a number to be added, ask which decision it will inform.
Give each KPI five things:
- An owner: the person or role who explains why it moved and acts on it. If you work alone, the owner can be "me" or a role such as "marketing lead".
- A baseline: where it started, from Lesson 6.3.
- A target: where the objective says it should be, and by when.
- A rhythm: how often it's checked. Leading indicators might be weekly; lagging ones monthly or quarterly.
- A decision: write it as "If this falls below X, we will...". If you can't finish the sentence, question whether the KPI belongs on the page.
Show change, not just numbers. "2,400 members" means little on its own. "2,400, up 150 on the baseline of 2,250, target 2,500" tells you where you are. Where there's a season, show the same period last year beside it.
Colours need rules. Red, amber and green are quick to read, but only if you've decided in advance what each colour means. Otherwise people argue about colours instead of acting.
Sketch it first. A pencil sketch or a simple table is enough for this task. Later you might build it in a spreadsheet or a free dashboard tool such as Looker Studio, but the thinking is the same. Test the sketch with one question: could someone pick it up on a Monday morning and know what to do?
6.5Milestone 1: The Strategic Audit
You've now built every piece of your Foundation stage work. A strategic audit puts it together: a structured review of where your organisation stands now, ending with the main issues to act on. It's Milestone 1, and the Practitioner stage starts from it. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it shows Maya Collins's audit for Larkfield.
The sections, each drawn from earlier work:
| Section | From |
|---|---|
| Marketplace and environment | Your map, scan and three implications, topic 1 |
| Customers and insight | Your research and insight statements, topic 2 |
| Target and path to purchase | Your target segment, persona and path, topic 3 |
| Proposition and 7Ps | Your proposition and the gaps you found, topic 4 |
| Compliance fixes | Your fix list, topic 5 |
| KPIs, baselines and dashboard | This topic |
Summarise, don't paste. Each section needs two or three sentences and the evidence behind them. Keep it in the present tense: this is where the organisation is, not what you plan. Then name your weakest evidence. Every audit has some, and saying so is a strength.
Choosing three issues. An issue is a problem or an opportunity that matters to the business goal. Test each candidate:
- Does it link to a KPI, so you'll know if it improves?
- Is there evidence for it, or only a hunch?
- Can marketing act on it?
Leadership: make the call. This is your first leadership moment in the course. You'll rarely have perfect evidence, and a list of fifteen problems isn't a decision. Choose three. For each, say why it matters, what the evidence is and what would change your mind. If someone more senior disagrees, your evidence is what you bring to the conversation.
Your three issues become the starting point for your campaign plan's objectives at Milestone 2, and your baselines are what you'll judge results against at the end of the course.
Larkfield's Baselines and Strategic Audit
Larkfield is fictional; its figures are illustrative. Leo Grant sets the shop's baselines for the year to 31 March 2026; Maya Collins writes the audit.
| KPI | Baseline | Source | Reliability |
|---|---|---|---|
| Website sessions | 320,000 | Web analytics | Medium: undercounts (consent) |
| One-off conversion rate | 2.0%: 6,400 orders | Shop orders ÷ sessions | Medium: relies on sessions |
| Average order value | £27.00 | Shop order system | High |
| Active subscribers | 1,800 (yearly average) | Subscription system | High |
| Monthly churn | 5%, about 90 cancellations | Subscription system | High |
| New subscribers | About 90 a month | Subscription system | High |
| Email list | 9,500 contacts | Email platform | Medium: pre-ticked box |
Does it add up? 6,400 orders × £27.00 = £172,800 one-off. 1,800 × £17.00 × 12 = £367,200 subscriptions. Total £540,000, the shop's revenue in Module 1.
From the outside. A free traffic-estimate tool shows about 25,000 visits a month against Leo's 26,700 (320,000 ÷ 12): close, but labelled "estimate, low reliability".
Maya's audit.
| Section | Summary |
|---|---|
| Marketplace and environment | Online shop: 45% of £1.2m; more home brewing, shoppers comparing price per bag, rising expectations on packaging and sourcing claims |
| Customers and insight | Freshness drives subscriptions; coffee building up: 39 of 96 former subscribers surveyed |
| Target and path | Home Brew Enthusiasts first, Gift Buyers at Christmas; Jordan's path: trial bag to subscription |
| Proposition and 7Ps | "Roasted in Derby, at your door within three days of roasting"; gap: the packaging claim |
| Compliance fixes | Packaging claim, pre-ticked box, "ethically sourced", phone cancellation |
Three issues. (1) Subscriber growth has stalled: about 90 join and 90 leave each month, yet subscriptions are £367,200 of £540,000. What would change Maya's mind: joiners outnumbering leavers for several months. (2) The sign-up journey, which every subscriber passes through, loses people. This is the weakest evidence: there's no completion figure yet, so it gets measured in Module 8; if most people who start sign-up already finish it, the issue is dropped. (3) Claims and consent: Module 5 found the four faults listed above. They risk customers' trust; the issue is dropped only if a fresh check finds all four already fixed.
Knowledge Check
You met the customer funnel in Module 3. A bike repair shop wants one KPI for each stage. Suggest one for awareness, consideration, purchase and loyalty, and say which is a leading indicator.
For example: website visits from new users (awareness), quote requests (consideration), the share of quotes that become booked jobs (purchase) and customers who return within a year (loyalty); quote requests are leading, because they move before bookings and revenue do.A colleague reports that the organisation's Instagram followers rose by 40% last quarter and calls it the team's best KPI. What would you ask?
"If this number doubled, what would we do differently?" and "Which objective does it link to?"; followers are usually a vanity metric, so replace them with a measure tied to an objective, such as sign-ups from Instagram traffic tracked with UTM tags.A charity's newsletter links are tagged utm_medium=Email in one issue and utm_medium=email in the next, and the SMS links aren't tagged at all. What will its analytics reports show?
Two separate lines for the same channel, because UTM values are case sensitive, and the SMS visits mostly counted as direct, so that campaign loses the credit; agree one lower-case naming list and tag every shared link.A garden centre ran an online campaign in April and compares April's sales with March's, then says the campaign worked. What's wrong with the baseline?
It ignores seasonality: spring is the garden centre's busy period, so April would usually beat March anyway; compare April with April last year, using the same definition, so the season doesn't take the campaign's credit.A learner with no internal data finds about 4,000 visits a month for their organisation in a free traffic-estimate tool and writes "4,000 visits a month" in their audit. What should they change?
Label it as an estimate with the tool, the date and a low reliability rating; an outside estimate can be close, as Larkfield's 25,000 against its own 26,700 showed, but without a label the next person will treat it as fact.A colleague's strategic audit ends with fourteen issues, all marked "important". How would you get it to three, and what should each one carry?
Test each issue: does it link to a KPI, is there evidence for it, and can marketing act on it? Keep the three that pass best, and give each why it matters, the evidence and what would change your mind; making that call is the leadership the audit asks for.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: GOV.UK Service Manual, "Data you must publish" (gov.uk/service-manual/measuring-success/data-you-must-publish, last updated 6 April 2021), sets out the four mandatory KPIs for government services and what each measures.
- Campaign tags: Google Analytics Help, "URL builders: Collect campaign data with custom URLs" (support.google.com/analytics/answer/10917952), lists the UTM parameters, says their values are case sensitive and links to a free URL builder.
- Analytics and consent: the ICO's guidance on the use of storage and access technologies, final version published 29 April 2026; its page "What are the exceptions?" (ico.org.uk, under For organisations, Direct marketing and privacy and electronic communications) explains the statistical purposes exception and its conditions. Check the current version; this isn't legal advice.
- Where SMART came from: Doran, G.T. (1981) "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives", Management Review, 70(11), pp. 35–36, the article usually credited with SMART; Doran's own letters (specific, measurable, assignable, realistic, time-related) differ slightly from the version used today.
- Further practice: complete every section of the Strategic Audit Builder for your organisation and print it as Milestone 1; your baselines are what you'll judge results against later in the course, so keep the sources and reliability ratings with them.
Your Strategic Audit
- What I made: my KPI tree, a baseline for each KPI with its source and reliability, a one-page dashboard, and my strategic audit with three issues, all saved in the Strategic Audit Builder.
- My weakest evidence, and why I still trust the audit enough to act on it.
- What I'd measure next to make that evidence stronger, and where the data would come from.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. Then look back at the whole Foundation stage on the Progress Map in Module 1's tool: which marker moved most, and which still sits at "not yet"?
- Choose what to do next: strengthen your weakest baseline with one more source before you go on, or start the Practitioner stage, where your three issues become your campaign plan's objectives.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Think of a car's dashboard. The speedometer and the fuel gauge are KPIs: they tell you whether you'll get where you're going, and in time. The number of times you've cleaned the car is a vanity metric. It feels good, and it tells you nothing about the journey.
A baseline is the reading before you set off. If you don't note how much fuel you started with, you can't say whether the new route used less.
If the whole topic feels like too much, take one small step. Pick one thing your organisation wants more of, such as bookings, members or sales. Write down one number that shows it. Then find last year's figure for that number, or an outside estimate, and write the source and "high", "medium" or "low" beside it. That's one KPI with a baseline. Do it three more times and you have the core of this topic's work.
The usual misconception is that more numbers make a better dashboard. They don't. Four numbers that each lead to a decision beat forty that nobody acts on.
Key terms in this module
- KPI
- Key performance indicator: one of the few measures that show whether an objective is being met.
- Baseline
- The value of a measure before you change anything, used as the starting point for targets and for judging results.
- Conversion rate
- The share of people who complete a chosen action, such as buying, out of those who had the chance to.
- Average order value (AOV)
- Revenue divided by the number of orders.
- Churn rate
- The share of customers or subscribers who leave in a period.
- Vanity metric
- A number that looks impressive but doesn't show whether a business objective is being met.
- Strategic audit
- A structured review of where an organisation stands now: its market, customers, offer, compliance and performance, with the main issues to act on.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Integrated Communications and Budgets
Why it matters. Most marketing budgets are spread thinly across channels that don't talk to each other. A joined-up plan with a budget you can explain gets more done with the same money, and gets you taken seriously. This is the first topic of the Practitioner stage. In the Foundation stage you worked out who your organisation serves, what it offers and where its numbers start. Now you plan how to reach those people: one idea told across channels that hand people on to each other, with money behind it that you can defend to a manager or a finance team. You'll finish with a communications plan and a budget for one objective from your strategic audit.
Progress marker: I can plan integrated communications and set and split a budget I can defend. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: Lesson 7.3 uses the balance you choose in Lesson 7.2, and Lesson 7.4 puts money behind the plan. If you've been handed a budget this week and need to split it, read the worked example, then go straight to Lesson 7.4. If you've inherited channels that someone else chose, start with Lesson 7.1 and check whether they tell one story.
Communications Budget Calculator
Enter a campaign budget and the share for each channel, production and contingency, and see the money per line, the working-to-non-working split and the most you can pay per new customer to meet your target.
7.1What Integration Means
You met paid, owned and earned media in Module 1, as parts of a marketplace map. Now they become the parts of a plan.
- Paid media is space you buy: search ads, social ads, posters, sponsorship.
- Owned media is channels you control: your website, email list, social accounts, packaging and premises.
- Earned media is coverage and sharing you don't pay for: press, reviews, word of mouth, customers' own posts.
Integrated marketing communications means planning all of these so they work together towards one objective, with one idea. Three tests tell you whether a plan is integrated.
- One idea. Could someone who saw your advert, your email and your shop window say in one sentence what they have in common? The idea comes from the proposition you wrote in Module 4, told in a way people remember.
- A consistent look and voice. The same colours, logo, tone and key phrase, so each contact adds to the memory the last one left. Consistent doesn't mean identical: a search ad and a video do different jobs.
- Hand-offs. Each channel should pass people on to a next step. An advert sends people to a page that answers the question it raised; a free sample carries a code that leads to sign-up. A broken hand-off wastes the money spent before it.
Without a plan, most organisations drift the other way: the social posts say one thing, the website another and the price promotion a third.
UK example: Cadbury. On 10 October 2022 the IPA (the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising) announced that VCCP's work for Cadbury, "There's a glass & a half in everyone", had won its Effectiveness Awards Grand Prix. The IPA reported that the campaign drove a 22% increase in annual value sales, and that Cadbury's annual revenue was £261m higher in 2021 than in 2017. Kantar's account of the work (February 2023) describes two strands under one idea, generosity: "storytelling", advertising that shows people being generous, and "storydoing", initiatives such as the Secret Santa Postal Service, first run in 2018, which let people send a free bar of chocolate to someone. The adverts and the thing people could take part in told the same story. Those results are the IPA's and Cadbury's; the full award paper sets out the evidence.
You won't have Cadbury's budget, but the test is the same at any size: one idea, told in each place in the way that place needs.
7.2Brand Building and Sales Activation
Not all communications do the same job.
Brand building creates memory and preference among the many people who will buy from your category later, though they aren't looking today. Its effects build slowly and last. Think of a distinctive video, a sponsorship or a well-known local presence.
Sales activation prompts people who are ready to buy to act now: a search ad, an offer, a reminder email. Its effects come quickly and fade quickly.
You need both. Activation harvests demand, and much of that demand was created by brand building, often years earlier. Cut the brand building and activation can keep sales up for a while, then it has less to harvest. Brand building alone may be too slow for an organisation that has to hit this quarter's numbers.
The evidence. Les Binet and Peter Field studied campaigns in the IPA's databank of Effectiveness Awards entries. In The Long and the Short of It (IPA, 2013) they found that, on average, the most effective campaigns put about 60% of spend into brand building and 40% into activation. Read it carefully:
- It's an average across many categories and brands, not a rule for yours. The IPA describes their later report, Effectiveness in Context (2018), as showing how the best mix can differ with brand type and context.
- The data come from award entries, which lean towards campaigns that worked.
- Your organisation, its budget and its category may look very different from the brands in that databank.
So treat 60:40 as a starting question, not an answer.
What this means for a small organisation. Brand building doesn't have to mean television. Consistent packaging, useful content, sampling, a community and local press can all build memory. When you choose your balance, ask three questions:
- The category: do people buy it often or rarely, and do they search when they need it, as they do for an emergency plumber?
- The objective: is it a short-term target, or growth over years?
- How customers buy: from your path to purchase, how much of the decision is made before anyone searches?
A short, sharp target pushes the balance towards activation. Just be honest that you're borrowing from memory that someone else, or an earlier campaign, built. Write the balance down with your reasons, so you can test it later.
7.3Media Planning Against the Path to Purchase
Media planning decides which channels to use, how much of each and when. Start from your customer, not from the channels your organisation happens to use already.
Match channels to stages. You mapped a path to purchase for your persona in Module 3. Now give each stage a channel with a clear job.
| Stage | The customer's job | Channels that can help |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | Notice a need | Social video, posters, sampling, PR |
| Search | Find options | Paid and organic search, reviews |
| Compare | Weigh them up | Your website, content, reviews |
| Buy | Act, without friction | Website, checkout, offers |
| After purchase | Come back and recommend | Email, community, packaging |
A stage with no channel is a gap. Two channels doing the same job at the same stage may be a waste.
Reach and frequency. Reach is how many of your target audience see a message at least once. Frequency is how many times, on average, those people see it. Too little frequency and you're forgotten; too much and you pay to annoy the same people. Brand building usually needs reach. Activation needs to be in front of the right people at the right moment.
Phasing. Timing matters as much as choice. You can run always on, in bursts, or building to a peak. You met seasonality in Module 6: if your customers buy before Christmas or in spring, plan the money to arrive before the peak, not during it.
One communications objective. You set KPIs with baselines in topic 6; now each campaign needs one communications objective, written as a KPI moving from its baseline to a target by a date. Every channel's job should help that one number move.
AI activity. Give an AI assistant your campaign budget, your objective and the stages of your path to purchase, with no personal or confidential data. Ask it for three different ways to split the budget across channels. Then challenge each split against your path and your baselines. Which stage does each channel serve? Is any stage empty? Note every assumption it made that you can't support, such as a cost per click or a conversion rate it didn't get from you. Keep the three splits and your notes in your portfolio: they show your judgement.
7.4Setting and Splitting a Budget
You now know what the plan needs to do. The budget has two questions: how much in total, and how to split it.
Setting the total. Four common methods, each with a weakness:
- Percentage of revenue: simple, but backwards. When sales fall, the budget falls, just when you might need it most.
- Matching competitors: you rarely know what they spend, and their objectives aren't yours.
- What you can afford: whatever is left over, with no link to what you're trying to achieve.
- Objective and task: list the tasks needed to meet the objective, cost each one, and add them up. It's the most defensible, and the hardest, because you have to estimate what each task will achieve.
In practice many managers start from objective and task, then check the total against what the organisation can afford. Say which method you used; a finance team will ask.
Splitting it. Working spend buys media that reaches people: ads, search clicks, promoted posts. Non-working spend pays for everything else: making the content, agency fees, tools, managing the work. Some costs, such as sampling at events, could go either way; decide, and say how you counted them. Too little non-working spend and you buy plenty of space for weak work. Too much and good work is seen by too few people.
Contingency is a part of the budget held back for problems or opportunities you can't predict: a channel that works better than expected, or creative that needs fixing. Decide in advance who can release it, and for what.
The target cost per new customer. Divide the budget by the extra customers you need. "Extra" matters: you set baselines in Module 6, and some customers would arrive anyway. Counting them makes the campaign look cheaper than it is. The answer is a limit to watch: if a channel brings customers in at more than this, question it. Whether the limit is affordable depends on what a customer is worth, which comes later in the course.
Your task. Read the worked example first. Then set a budget for one objective from your strategic audit and split it in the Communications Budget Calculator. If your organisation has no budget you can see, use a stated assumption, such as a share of its published revenue, and label it as an assumption.
Larkfield's "Roasted This Week" Budget
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, plans an autumn campaign, "Roasted This Week", from 1 September to 30 November 2026. It tackles the first issue in Larkfield's strategic audit: subscriber growth has stalled, because about 90 new subscribers a month only replace about 90 cancellations.
The objective. Grow active subscribers from 1,800 to 2,100 by 30 November 2026: a net gain of 300.
The split. The campaign gets £30,000 of Larkfield's £96,000 annual marketing budget.
| Line | Amount | Share | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paid social | £12,000 | 40% | Working |
| Paid search | £6,000 | 20% | Working |
| Creative and content production | £6,000 | 20% | Non-working |
| Sampling at events and partner cafés | £4,000 | 13.3% | Non-working |
| Contingency | £2,000 | 6.7% | Non-working |
| Total | £30,000 | 100% |
The check: £12,000 + £6,000 + £6,000 + £4,000 + £2,000 = £30,000. Working media is £12,000 + £6,000 = £18,000, which is 60%. Non-working is £6,000 + £4,000 + £2,000 = £12,000, which is 40%. Sampling isn't bought media, so Maya counts it as non-working and says so.
Brand and activation. Content and sampling are the brand-building side: they give people something to remember and a chance to taste the freshness the proposition promises. Paid search and paid social carry most of the activation. By money, the campaign leans towards activation, which suits a three-month target. Maya writes that down as a trade-off, not a rule.
By stage. Sampling meets Jordan, the persona, near the trigger; paid search is there when Jordan types "coffee subscription"; paid social reaches Home Brew Enthusiasts who aren't searching yet.
The target cost per extra subscriber. £30,000 ÷ 300 = £100. The baseline matters here: the 90 or so new subscribers a month that arrive anyway only replace cancellations, so the 300 must come on top. Any channel bringing subscribers in at well over £100 each gets questioned. Whether £100 is affordable depends on what a subscriber is worth to Larkfield, which the course works out later; for now it's the limit Maya plans against.
Knowledge Check
A gym's posters say "No contracts", its website leads with "Premium personal training" and its social posts are mostly discount codes. Is this integrated, and what would you fix first?
No: each channel tells a different story, so nothing builds a memory; agree one idea from the gym's proposition first, then make each channel tell it in its own way and hand people on to the next step.A finance director wants the budget split exactly 60% brand building and 40% activation "because the research says so". How do you respond?
Explain that Binet and Field's 60:40 is an average from IPA award entries, which lean towards campaigns that worked, and that the best mix varies with category and situation; use it as a starting point, justify a split for your organisation and test it.A shop moves all its money from brand building into search ads. Sales hold for a few months, then start to slip. What is the likely reason?
Search ads mostly harvest demand that already exists, much of it created by earlier brand building; with nothing renewing that memory, fewer people search for the shop, so activation has less to harvest.In Module 6 you set baselines. A florist normally gets about 40 new customers a month. A two-month campaign costing £3,000 brings in 140 new customers. What did each extra customer cost, and why does the baseline matter?
About 80 would have come anyway, so the campaign added 60 and each cost £3,000 ÷ 60 = £50, not £3,000 ÷ 140 (about £21); ignoring the baseline makes a campaign look much cheaper than it is.An agency proposes a £20,000 campaign: £15,000 for production and £5,000 for media. What is the working share, and what question would you ask?
Working spend is £5,000 ÷ £20,000 = 25%, so most of the money makes content rather than showing it to people; ask whether £5,000 of media can reach enough of the target audience often enough to meet the objective.Why is "a fixed percentage of last year's revenue" a weak way to set a marketing budget on its own?
It ties spending to past sales rather than to the objective, so the budget shrinks when sales fall, just when marketing may be needed most; objective and task links the money to what it must achieve.
Resources & Further Practice
- Brand and activation: Binet, L. and Field, P. (2013) The Long and the Short of It, IPA, is the source of the average 60:40 guide; read it for how brand-building and activation effects differ over time, not for a rule.
- The later research: the IPA's "Les Binet and Peter Field" page, under Knowledge on the IPA website, lists Media in Focus (2017) and Effectiveness in Context (2018), which shows how the best mix can differ with brand type and context.
- The UK example at source: the IPA's announcement "2022 IPA Effectiveness Awards winners announced" (10 October 2022) gives the Cadbury results quoted in this topic; the full award paper is in the IPA's case library and on WARC, which many universities subscribe to.
- How the Cadbury idea was used: Kantar's article "Unwrapped: The secrets of Cadbury's award-winning Secret Santa campaign" (2 February 2023) describes the "storytelling and storydoing" strands and the Secret Santa Postal Service.
- Further practice: build a second scenario in the Communications Budget Calculator for your organisation, the same objective with 20% less money, and write down which line you'd cut first and what that would cost you in reach.
Your Plan and Your Budget
- What I did: my "one idea, many places" sketch, my channel plan by stage and my budget split in the Communications Budget Calculator, with the target cost per new customer.
- My plan and the trade-off I made: one channel or stage I chose not to fund, and why.
- One thing I'd test early: a channel, a message or a cost assumption I'd check in the first weeks before committing the rest of the money.
- Rate yourself again on the progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. If you're at "not yet" or "with support", reread the worked example and rebuild Larkfield's split in the Communications Budget Calculator before you redo your own.
- Choose what to do next: build a second budget scenario in the Communications Budget Calculator (for example, the same objective with 20% less money) and note what you'd cut first, or move on and carry your plan into your campaign plan at Milestone 2.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Think of a band on tour. It plays the same songs every night, but a festival field, a small club and a radio session each get a different version. Nobody hears the set as a jumble; the songs are what they remember.
Integration works the same way. The idea is the song. Each channel is a venue: a search ad is the short radio version, a video is the full stage show, a sample at a café is the acoustic set. If each venue played a different band's songs, people would leave with no memory of who they'd heard.
Try it on your organisation. Write its idea in one sentence. Then pick three places it appears today and ask of each: is this the same song? Any "no" is the first thing to fix, before you spend more money on that channel.
The budget is the tour plan: how many nights, which venues, and money kept back in case a van breaks down.
Key terms in this module
- Integrated marketing communications
- Planning all of an organisation's messages and channels so that they work together towards the same objective with one consistent idea.
- Paid, owned and earned media
- Paid media is space you buy; owned media is channels you control, such as your website and email list; earned media is coverage and sharing you don't pay for.
- Brand building
- Communications that build memory and preference over the long term among many potential buyers.
- Sales activation
- Communications that prompt people who are ready to buy to act now.
- Working and non-working spend
- Working spend buys media that reaches people; non-working spend pays for producing the content and managing the work.
- Contingency
- Part of a budget held back for problems or opportunities you can't predict.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Content, UX and User Journeys
Why it matters. Paying to bring people to a page they can't use is the most expensive mistake in digital marketing. Fixing the journey often does more than spending more on ads. Your communications plan brings people to your organisation's website or app; what they find there decides whether they do what they came for. In this topic you'll plan content from what users need, check how easy a page is to use, map one key journey to find where people give up, and make the content accessible to everyone, including disabled people.
Progress marker: I can map a user journey, find where people drop off and fix the content and design. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one fills the next group of the Content and UX Journey Audit, and the journey map in Lesson 8.3 uses the user needs and usability checks from the lessons before it. If a sign-up, booking or checkout is losing people right now, read the worked example, then start at Lesson 8.3 and come back to the earlier lessons afterwards. If you've been asked to check a page for accessibility, start with Lesson 8.4.
Content and UX Journey Audit
Audit one key journey on your organisation's website or app for clear content, ease of use, accessibility and trust, and get a prioritised list of fixes.
8.1Content Strategy From User Needs
You met Jordan's path to purchase in Module 3: trigger, search, compare, buy, and buy again. At every stage Jordan is looking for something. Now you plan the content that gives it to them.
User needs before organisation wants. Organisations tend to publish what they want to say: news about themselves, awards, a long "about us" page. Users arrive with a question or a task. A content strategy is the plan for what content to create, for whom, why, where it lives and how it's kept up to date, and it starts from user needs. Content design is the writing end of the same idea: start from the need and choose the clearest form to meet it. That might be a table, a short answer or a video rather than an article.
UK example: GOV.UK. The government's design principles (first published 3 April 2012, last updated 2 April 2025) begin with "Start with user needs", and add: "If you don't know what the user needs are, you won't build the right thing." GOV.UK's content guidance says content design starts by taking a user need and meeting it in the best way possible. A government website isn't selling anything, but the discipline transfers: every page should exist because someone needs it.
Writing a user need. Use a simple form: "As a [who], I need to [do or know what], so that [why]." For example: "As a first-time buyer, I need to know when my order will arrive, so that I can be in." Find needs in your research from Module 2, customer emails, reviews, the questions staff get asked, and what people type into your own site's search box.
Pillars, formats and homes. Group the needs into three to five content pillars: the themes your organisation will be useful on. Then decide each piece's format (page, guide, video, email or post) and where it lives. Content that answers a lasting question belongs on your own website, where people can find it again. Social posts point to it; they don't replace it.
Ownership. Content goes out of date: prices change, offers end, people leave. Give every important page an owner and a review date. Out-of-date content costs trust, and it can break the rules you met in Module 5, for example an old price or a claim you can no longer support.
Choosing less. Ask one question of every planned piece: which user need does it meet? If the answer is none, don't make it.
8.2Usability Basics
Content can meet a real need and still fail if people can't work the page. Usability is how easily people can do what they came to do. In Module 4 you checked Process as one of the 7Ps; usability is that process seen through a screen. You don't need a lab to judge it. You need a few principles and an honest five minutes.
Five basics.
- Clear labels: buttons and links say what happens next ("Choose your delivery date", not "Submit").
- One obvious next step: the main action stands out, and everything else is quieter.
- Short forms: ask only for what you need now. Every extra field is another reason to stop.
- Helpful error messages: say what went wrong and how to fix it, next to the field ("Enter a postcode, like DE1 1AA"), and keep what the person already typed.
- Mobile first: people often arrive on a phone, straight from a social post or an email. Design for a small screen and a thumb, then check the computer view.
Nielsen's heuristics. In 1994 Jakob Nielsen published ten usability heuristics: general rules of thumb, first developed with Rolf Molich in 1990. The Nielsen Norman Group still publishes them. Four are especially useful for marketers:
- Visibility of system status: people can see where they are, such as "Step 2 of 3".
- Match between the system and the real world: use the customer's words, not internal jargon.
- User control and freedom: an easy way back, or out, without losing work.
- Error prevention: stop mistakes before they happen, such as a date picker that won't accept a date in the past.
The five-minute check. Pick one key page, such as a product page, a booking page or a sign-up form. Pretend you're a new customer with one task. On your phone:
- In five seconds, can you tell what the page is for and what to do next?
- Can you finish the task without zooming, guessing or going back?
- Make a mistake on purpose. Does the error message help you fix it?
- Count the form fields. Which could go?
- Repeat on a computer, and note what changes.
Write each problem down in one line, with where it happened. Don't fix anything yet: you're collecting evidence. The journey map in the next lesson shows which problems cost the most.
8.3Mapping a Journey and Finding Drop-off
Read the worked example later in this topic first: it maps Larkfield's subscription sign-up from start to finish.
Which journey? The path to purchase you mapped in Module 3 crossed many places, and one of them is usually your organisation's website or app. Choose the journey where the path turns into action: a sign-up, booking, checkout, donation or enquiry form. If your communications plan from Module 7 sends people somewhere, start there. Paid visitors lost at this point are money lost.
The journey map. A user journey map is a step-by-step picture of one task, for one type of user, such as your target segment. For each step, write:
- what the user does ("taps Subscribe");
- what they think ("Do I have to create an account?");
- how they feel (confident, unsure, annoyed);
- where they get stuck, and your evidence.
Finding drop-off in the numbers. Drop-off is the point where people leave without finishing. Analytics tools can show it as a funnel report: how many people reach each step and how many fall out in between. In GA4 this is called a funnel exploration. The headline figure is the completion rate: people who finish divided by people who start. You met baselines in Module 6; now the completion rate becomes this journey's baseline, and any redesign is judged against it. Remember the consent gaps from that topic: analytics undercounts, so read the shape of the funnel as well as the totals. If you can't see your organisation's analytics, count the steps and fields as a visitor and label any drop-off you estimate as an assumption.
Finding the why by watching. Numbers show where people leave; they rarely show why. Watch one real person try the task, ideally someone like your target customer. Give them the task, not instructions ("Sign up for a coffee subscription"), ask them to think aloud, and stay quiet. Note every pause, frown and step back. Ask their permission first, as you did for research in Module 2. One person can't tell you how common a problem is, but they'll show you problems you'd never have guessed.
Reassurance before payment. Many sticking points are worries: hidden costs, being locked in, not knowing how to cancel. Answer them on the page, before payment, where the worry happens.
From map to fixes. Write one fix for each sticking point. Try first the fix at the step with the biggest drop-off and the strongest evidence. Keep your map and fixes in your portfolio document: they go into your campaign plan in Module 10, in the Creative Brief and Campaign Plan Builder.
8.4Accessible and Inclusive Content
Accessibility means designing so that disabled people, and everyone else, can use a service. It covers people with sight, hearing, movement and cognitive impairments, and it helps anyone using a phone in bright sun or with one hand free.
The standard. The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) come from the W3C, the web's standards body. WCAG 2.2 became a W3C Recommendation on 5 October 2023. It has three levels, A, AA and AAA; AA is the usual target.
UK example: the law in outline. GOV.UK's guidance (last updated 30 September 2024) says most public sector websites and apps must meet WCAG 2.2 AA (some bodies are exempt) under the Public Sector Bodies Accessibility Regulations 2018, and publish an accessibility statement. Private organisations aren't covered by them, but under the Equality Act 2010, service providers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled people, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission describes the duty as anticipatory: think about all potential disabled customers, not only the ones you know about. This isn't legal advice.
Six checks anyone can do.
- Contrast: normal text needs a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 against its background. Pale grey on white often fails.
- Alt text: each meaningful image has a short text alternative saying what it shows and why it's there. Decorative images get empty alt text, so screen readers skip them.
- Headings: real headings, in order, so screen reader users can jump through the page.
- Links that make sense on their own: "See delivery prices", not "click here".
- Forms: every field has a visible label, errors are explained in words rather than colour alone, and nobody has to type the same thing twice (Redundant Entry, new in WCAG 2.2).
- Tap targets: at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels, with some exceptions (Target Size (Minimum), also new in 2.2).
Plain English. Short sentences, everyday words, the most important thing first. GOV.UK's content guidance asks for content that is clear and written in plain English. It helps people reading in a second language or in a hurry.
Inclusive words and images. Use the words people use about themselves, and show the range of your customers in photos, as you checked in the regulation topic.
AI activity. Paste one public page from your organisation's website into an AI assistant (no personal data). Ask it to rewrite the page in plain English, then describe two images and ask for alt text for each. Check every change: is each fact still true, has it added a claim or figure, does it still sound like your organisation, and is the alt text accurate and short? Fix what it got wrong, and note what you changed and why.
Larkfield's Subscription Sign-up
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins's strategic audit in Module 6 named the sign-up journey as one of three issues, with no baseline yet. Leo Grant, the digital marketing executive, now maps it. The "Roasted This Week" campaign from Module 7 will send paid visitors here: a lost sign-up wastes campaign money.
Choosing the journey. Jordan's path from Module 3 runs from a trial bag to a subscription. Subscriber growth has stalled because joiners only replace leavers, so the subscription sign-up is the journey that matters most.
The baseline. The old sign-up has five steps, and 30% of visitors who start it finish: for every 10 who start, 3 subscribe.
Watching one person. One subscriber tries the old sign-up, thinking aloud, while Leo watches.
| Step | Hesitation seen |
|---|---|
| 1. Choose coffee | None |
| 2. Grind | None |
| 3. Frequency | None |
| 4. Create account | Being made to create an account |
| 5. Payment | None |
The second hesitation runs through the whole journey: not knowing they could pause. It links back to Module 2: coffee building up at home was the top reason for cancelling, given by 39 of the 96 former subscribers. The fix from Module 5 lets subscribers cancel online; the sign-up has to show the flexibility up front.
The redesign.
- Three steps instead of five.
- Guest checkout, so nobody is made to create an account.
- "Skip, pause or change frequency any time" shown before payment, where the worry happens.
The target. 40% completion, measured with the same funnel report against the 30% baseline. That's 4 in 10 starters instead of 3, a third more sign-ups from the same visitors.
Content that meets a need. Leo writes Jordan's needs as user needs. "As a home brewer, I need to know what's been roasted this week, so that I get it at its freshest": the weekly "Roasted This Week" note. "As a home brewer, I need to get the best from my kit, so that every cup tastes right": the brewing guides.
The audit. In the Content and UX Journey Audit, the old journey's forced account and missing reassurance before payment are both Not yet.
Knowledge Check
You mapped a path to purchase in Module 3. A gym's path runs: trigger (a new year's resolution), search, compare prices and timetables, book a free trial class, then join. Which website journey would you map first, and why?
The free trial booking, because it's where the path turns from looking into action on the gym's own site; if people give up there, the money spent bringing them to the site is wasted, and it leads straight to joining.A bakery's website has a long "Our story" page, three press articles and no opening times. Using user needs, what would you change first?
Add opening times where every page can reach them, because "I need to know when you're open, so that I can visit" is a real need; the story and press serve what the bakery wants to say, so they can stay but come second.A charity's donation form has an "Enter" button, and when someone mistypes their postcode the form clears every field and shows "Error 402". Name two usability problems and a fix for each.
The label doesn't say what happens next (use "Donate £10" or "Continue to payment"), and the error message neither explains the problem nor keeps what was typed (say "Enter a postcode, like DE1 1AA" next to the field and keep the other answers).An events company's funnel report shows 1,000 people start booking in a month and 200 finish. What's the completion rate, and what should it do before redesigning anything?
20% (200 ÷ 1,000); record it as the baseline, then find where in the funnel most people drop off and watch one real person try the booking to see why, so the fix targets the actual sticking point.A colleague says the company website doesn't need to follow WCAG because it isn't a public sector body. How would you answer?
The public sector regulations don't apply to it, but under the Equality Act 2010 service providers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled people, a duty the EHRC calls anticipatory; WCAG 2.2 AA is the practical yardstick, and accessible pages work better for everyone (not legal advice).An AI assistant rewrites a hotel's booking page in plain English and adds "free cancellation on all rooms". The original page didn't say that. What do you do?
Remove it unless the hotel's own terms confirm it for every room, because the AI has added a claim, and a false one could mislead customers; check every fact the AI changes or adds against the source before anything is published.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: GOV.UK, "Government design principles" (first published 3 April 2012, last updated 2 April 2025), eleven principles starting with "Start with user needs"; search GOV.UK for the title.
- Content design: GOV.UK content and publishing guidance, "Understand content design", explains how to start from a user need and write clear, plain English content; search for the title on GOV.UK's publishing guidance site.
- Usability: Jakob Nielsen, "10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design", Nielsen Norman Group (first published 1994, last reviewed 30 January 2024), with a short explanation and example for each heuristic.
- Accessibility standard: W3C, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, a W3C Recommendation since 5 October 2023; the W3C's quick reference, "How to Meet WCAG", lets you filter the success criteria by level.
- Accessibility and the law: GOV.UK, "Understanding accessibility requirements for public sector bodies" (last updated 30 September 2024), covers the 2018 regulations, WCAG 2.2 AA and accessibility statements; the Equality and Human Rights Commission's guidance covers the Equality Act 2010. This isn't legal advice.
- Funnel reports: Google Analytics Help, "[GA4] Funnel exploration", shows how to set up the steps of a journey and see how many people fall out at each one.
- Further practice: complete the Content and UX Journey Audit for one key journey on your organisation's website or app, and keep your journey map and ranked fixes in your portfolio document for the campaign plan.
Your Journey Map and First Fix
- What I made: three user needs and the content that meets them, a five-minute usability check, a journey map for one key journey in my portfolio document, and the Content and UX Journey Audit with my fixes ranked.
- Where people get stuck on my organisation's journey, and my evidence: numbers, watching someone, or both.
- The fix I'd try first, why it comes first, and the measure I'd judge it by.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- Choose what to do next: test your first fix with one person (show them a sketch or the changed page and watch again), or move on to search, email and communities, which will bring people to the journey you've just fixed.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Watch one person use it. You'll learn more in five minutes than from a page of numbers.
Think of a café that pays for posters all over town, then has a front door that sticks. People walk up, push, think it's closed and leave. The posters worked. The door didn't. No amount of extra posters fixes the door, and you'd only spot it by standing outside and watching someone try to get in.
That's this topic in one picture. Your communications are the posters. The website journey is the door. A journey map is just a careful note of what happens at the door: each step, what people do, what they're thinking, and where they give up.
If the whole topic feels like too much, take one small step. Ask a friend to do one task on your organisation's website on their phone, such as booking, signing up or finding opening times. Don't help. Write down every place they pause or ask a question. Pick the pause that nearly made them give up, and write one sentence on how you'd fix it. That's a journey map with one fix, and it's the core of this topic's work.
The usual misconception is that people leave because they've lost interest. Often they haven't: they're unsure, worried or stuck, and a clearer word in the right place keeps them.
Key terms in this module
- User experience (UX)
- How easy, useful and pleasant it is for someone to do what they came to do on a website, app or service.
- User journey map
- A step-by-step picture of how a user moves through a task, with what they do, think and feel and where they get stuck.
- Content strategy
- Planning what content to create, for whom, why, where it lives and how it's kept up to date.
- Content design
- Starting from the user's need and writing content in the clearest form to meet it.
- Accessibility
- Designing so that disabled people, and everyone else, can use a service; in the UK, usually judged against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
- Drop-off
- The point in a journey where people leave without finishing.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Search, Email and Social Communities
Why it matters. Search, email and social communities are where most digital marketers spend their week. Knowing what each is for stops you doing all three badly. Each channel has its own job. Search meets people who are already looking. Email keeps in touch with people who said yes. A community gives customers a reason to talk to each other, not just to you. In Module 8 you fixed the journey people take on your organisation's website; now you plan the channels that bring them to it, keep them and turn some of them into fans. You'll finish with one joined-up channel plan, with a KPI for each channel.
Progress marker: I can plan search, email and community activity that work together, each with a KPI. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one fills a section of the Search, Email and Community Plan, and Lesson 9.4 joins the three. If you have an email to send this week, start with Lesson 9.2, because permission comes before anything else. If you've been asked to "do something about our Facebook group", start with Lesson 9.3. If your organisation has no email list yet, you still do every task: you'll plan how to start one lawfully.
Search, Email and Community Plan
Your keyword themes by intent, priority pages, email segments and automated sequences, community purpose and house rules, and the KPI for each channel, as one printable channel plan.
9.1Search: Meeting People Who Are Already Looking
You met Jordan's path to purchase in Module 3: after the trigger comes search. Search is the one channel where people tell you what they want, in their own words, at the moment they want it. Your job is to be the useful answer.
Search intent is what the person searching is trying to do. Four jobs are common:
- Learn: "how to brew with an AeroPress".
- Find a particular site: a shop's name plus "opening times".
- Compare: "best running shoes for beginners".
- Buy: "coffee subscription".
Read intent from the words, then check the results page. If the first results are guides, searchers want to learn; if they're shops, they want to buy.
Keyword themes. A keyword theme is a group of searches with the same intent that one page can answer. You can find them for free:
- the suggestions a search engine shows as you type, and the related searches at the foot of the results
- your website's own search box, if it records what people type
- Google Search Console, which shows the searches your site already appears for and how often people click
- the words customers used in your research from Module 2, in reviews and in emails
Keyword tools add search volumes, but their figures are estimates and differ between tools.
SEO basics. Search engine optimisation earns a place in the unpaid results. Google's guidance, "Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content", asks whether content is made mainly to help people or mainly to attract visits from search engines. Four basics follow:
- useful content that answers the search well, written from real experience
- titles and headings in the searcher's own words
- links: your pages linking to each other, and other sites linking to you because the content is worth it
- technical health: pages search engines can reach, that load quickly and work on a phone
SEO is slow to build, and it lasts.
Paid search shows your ads against the searches you choose, and you usually pay when someone clicks. It's fast, you control the message, and it stops when the money stops. Use it where people are ready to buy, or to test which themes bring customers before you invest in content.
AI answers. Google now shows AI-written summaries, called AI Overviews, above some results, and other tools answer questions directly. These features change often. Google says there are no extra requirements to appear in them: the same basics apply. Some learn searches may now be answered without a click, so make your pages the clear, trustworthy source those answers draw on, and judge learn content by more than clicks.
9.2Email: Talking to People Who Said Yes
Email is owned media: no platform decides who sees it. But you can only use it with permission, and people leave as soon as it stops being useful.
Permission first. You met the rules in Module 5. To send marketing emails to individuals you generally need consent: a clear action, such as ticking an empty box. The soft opt-in is the exception for your own customers. You got their details during a sale or while discussing a sale, you're emailing about your own similar products, and you gave a simple way to refuse then and in every email. A message about an order someone has placed, such as a dispatch notice, is a service message rather than marketing, as long as it doesn't slip in promotion. The ICO says its email guidance is under review after the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, so check its current pages. If your organisation has no list, start one lawfully: an unticked box, a line saying what you'll send and how often, and a link to the privacy notice.
Segments. Email segmentation divides a list so that each group gets messages that suit it. Segment on what people do, not just who they are: new customers, regular buyers, people who haven't bought for a while, people interested in one product line. One email to everyone suits no one.
Sequences. Automated sequences are sent by a trigger, such as signing up, not by a date. The most useful is a welcome series: a few emails that set expectations, help new subscribers or customers get value and point to the next step. Others follow a first order, come before a renewal or check in when someone goes quiet. Give each email one job and one action.
Subject lines. Say what's inside; clear beats clever. The advertising rules from Module 5 apply to emails too, so a subject line promising an offer the email doesn't contain is misleading.
Deliverability is whether your email reaches the inbox. Complaints and ignored emails hurt; a list that wants your emails helps. Since 1 February 2024 Google has required everyone sending to Gmail addresses to authenticate their email and keep the reported spam rate below 0.3% (it advises staying below 0.1%). Anyone sending 5,000 or more messages a day must also set up DMARC and offer one-click unsubscribe. Your email platform handles much of this.
KPIs beyond opens. In June 2021 Apple announced Mail Privacy Protection, which, for Apple Mail users who turn it on, stops senders knowing when they open an email. Open rates have been unreliable since. Judge email by what people do next: clicks, orders or sign-ups from the email, unsubscribes and complaints.
9.3Social Communities: Customers Talking to Each Other
An audience listens to you. A community talks to each other. Followers who like your posts are an audience. Customers who answer each other's questions, swap tips and turn up to events are a community. That difference is the point: members get value from each other, so they come back without being chased.
Purpose. Start with what members get, not what the organisation wants. "A place to talk about our products" is weak. "Help each other get better at home brewing" gives people a reason to post. If you can't write the purpose in one sentence a member would agree with, the community will be quiet.
Where it lives. A group on a social platform, a forum on your own site or a chat server. A group on a platform people already use is easy to join, but the platform sets the rules and can change them. A forum you own is yours, but people have to remember to visit. Choose where your members already spend time, and know what you'd lose if the platform changed.
House rules say what the community is for and what isn't allowed: be kind, stay on topic, no selling, no sharing other people's details. Keep them short and pinned.
Moderation is setting and enforcing the rules. Decide who moderates, how members report a problem, and what happens next: usually a warning, then a suspension, then removal. An unmoderated group drifts into spam or worse, with your organisation's name on it.
The organisation's role. Host, not star. Staff welcome newcomers, answer what only the organisation can answer, and say what changed because of members' ideas. Complaints will appear in public: answer them openly and move personal details to a private channel. Members' posts are personal data, so the rules from Module 5 apply here too.
UK example: Monzo. The bank Monzo runs a community forum. In a blog post on 5 November 2018, Monzo said the forum began as "a home for our first few hundred customers to give us feedback", that its Pots feature for setting money aside "started life as an idea" there, and that each feature it launched in Monzo Labs had its own forum thread for feedback. Its guidelines (checked November 2026) describe a place where users "should feel welcome and included to share their opinions". They set zero tolerance for abuse, harassment and discrimination, and describe a moderation team of Community Leaders and staff, with staff having the ultimate say and penalties that step up from a warning. Members can flag posts, and a post flagged by several members is hidden until it's reviewed. These are Monzo's own descriptions; the same parts work for a running club.
9.4Making Search, Email and Community Work Together
You met hand-offs in Module 7: each channel should pass people on to a next step. Search, email and community make those steps concrete.
| Channel | Its job | Hands people on to |
|---|---|---|
| Search | Answers people who are already asking | A page that does what they came for, then a sign-up |
| Talks to people who said yes | The next purchase, and the community | |
| Community | Lets customers talk to each other | Recommendations, reviews and new searches |
A learn page found through search can offer an email sign-up that fits it, such as a guide sent by email. The welcome series can invite people into the community. Community members recommend you, their friends search for you by name, and the loop starts again.
One KPI per channel. You built KPIs with baselines in Module 6. Give each channel one KPI that shows it doing its job, not a vanity metric:
- search: sales or sign-ups from organic search, not rankings
- email: an action after the email, such as a second order, not opens
- community: active members, such as members who post, not total members
Say where each number comes from. Tag the links in emails and community posts with UTM parameters, as in Module 6, so visits get the right credit instead of showing as direct. If you have no baseline yet, record the first month before you set a target.
The channel you'd drop. Small teams can't run everything well. Ask which channel your organisation could stop with least harm. A quiet community damages trust, and a neglected list goes stale. Doing two channels well beats doing three badly.
One test. Pick one thing to test first: two subject lines, a new page for one keyword theme, or a welcome email that invites people to the community. Decide the measure before you start.
AI activity. Read the worked example first. Then give an AI assistant 15 to 20 searches related to your organisation, with no personal or confidential data, and ask it to group them by intent. Ask it for five subject lines for the first email in your sequence. Check each group against real search results: search a few of the terms and see whether the results are guides, shops or comparisons. Check each subject line against your organisation's voice and the rules on misleading claims from Module 5: does it promise anything the email doesn't deliver? Note what you kept, changed and rejected, and why.
Larkfield's Joined-Up Channel Plan
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Leo Grant, the digital marketing executive, has the redesigned sign-up from Module 8. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, asks for a plan that brings people to it, keeps them and gets some talking. He plans for Jordan from Module 3.
Search. Leo lists Jordan's likely searches, using Search Console, the site's search box and reviews. He groups the searches by intent and gives each group a page.
| Keyword theme | Intent | Page |
|---|---|---|
| "coffee subscription" | Buy | The subscription sign-up |
| "fresh roasted coffee beans" | Compare, then buy | The beans range page |
| "how to brew with an AeroPress" | Learn | A brewing guide |
Paid search covers the buying theme now. The guides earn their place slowly through SEO, and offer a sign-up.
Email. Leo asks first who can receive a welcome email: the soft opt-in question from Module 5. A new subscriber gave their details in a sale, the emails are about similar products and an opt-out is offered, so Larkfield can send. A newsletter sign-up from a guide needs its own clear consent.
The welcome series is three emails over 10 days, each with one job:
- Day 0: what happens next, and how to skip or pause.
- Day 4: getting the best from the first bag.
- Day 10: an invitation to Brew Club.
Separately, a reminder goes out three days before each dispatch, with a one-click skip or pause. It is a service message about an order, with no promotion. It answers the top reason for cancelling in Module 2: coffee building up.
Community. Larkfield Brew Club is a moderated online group for subscribers. Its purpose: help each other get better at home brewing. The house rules are short: be kind, stay on topic, no selling, no sharing other people's details. Leo moderates, and there is a monthly online tasting with the head roaster.
One KPI each. Search: subscription sign-ups from organic search. Email: the welcome series' second-order rate. Community: Brew Club members who post in their first month. Leo tags the links, as in Module 6, and records the first month as the baseline before setting a target.
The first test. Two subject lines for the day 10 invitation, judged by how many people join Brew Club.
Knowledge Check
A bakery sees people searching "birthday cake delivery near me" and "how to store a sponge cake". Which is closer to buying, and what should each lead to?
"Birthday cake delivery near me" is a buy search and should lead to the ordering page; "how to store a sponge cake" is a learn search and suits a short guide that offers a related sign-up.A shop's owner says, "Our open rate is 55%, so the emails are working." Why is that not enough?
Since Apple's Mail Privacy Protection in 2021, opens are unreliable because some are recorded without anyone reading the email; judge it by what people did next, such as clicks, orders and unsubscribes.A gym collected a customer's email when they bought a day pass and now wants to send a marketing email about its memberships. Under what condition might the soft opt-in apply, and what must it have offered?
It may apply if the gym is promoting its own similar services to someone who gave their details during a sale or while discussing one, and it offered a simple way to refuse when it collected them and in every email (check the ICO's current guidance; this isn't legal advice).A running club's Facebook group has 2,000 members, but only a handful ever post, and the club posts announcements to it. Is this an audience or a community, and what could the club change?
It is mostly an audience, because members talk to the club, not each other; the club could set a purpose members share, ask questions members can answer and host an event, and measure members who post, not total members.A florist runs search, email and a community group, but has one part-time employee. How should the florist decide what to do?
Pick the channel to drop by asking which could stop with least harm, since a neglected list or a quiet community hurts trust; doing two well beats doing three badly, and each kept channel gets one KPI.An AI assistant groups your keywords and writes the subject line "Last chance: 50% off everything". You have no offer planned. What do you do?
Reject it, because a subject line promising an offer the email doesn't contain is misleading under the advertising rules from Module 5; check each AI group against real search results too.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: Monzo, "How our community helps us build a better bank", blog post, 5 November 2018, on how the forum began and how Pots started as an idea there; the forum's current guidelines are on community.monzo.com, so search for "Monzo community guidelines".
- Helpful content: Google Search Central, "Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content", Google's own guidance on writing for people first; search for the title.
- Your site's search data: Google Search Central Help, the Search Console performance report, shows the searches your site already appears for and how often they are clicked; search for "Search Console performance report".
- Email and the law: ICO, "Electronic mail marketing" in its Guide to PECR, covers consent and the soft opt-in; the ICO says the page is under review after the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, so check it is current. This isn't legal advice.
- Sender rules: Google, "Email sender guidelines" for Gmail, sets out the authentication, spam rate and unsubscribe requirements for bulk senders; search for the title.
- Open rates: Apple Newsroom, "Apple advances its privacy leadership with iOS 15, iPadOS 15, macOS Monterey, and watchOS 8" (7 June 2021), which introduced Mail Privacy Protection, on why open rates have been unreliable since; search for the title.
- Further practice: complete the Search, Email and Community Plan for your organisation, and keep your channel plan in your portfolio document for the campaign plan.
Your Channel Plan
- What I made: keyword themes by intent with a page for each, a three-email sequence for one segment, a community plan, and the Search, Email and Community Plan with a KPI for each channel.
- The channel I'd drop if I had to, and why.
- One test I will run first, and the measure I'll judge it by.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- Choose what to do next: go deeper on the channel you'll use most, or move on to the creative brief and campaign plan, where these channels become one campaign.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Each channel has one job. Search answers people who are already asking. Email talks to people who said yes. A community lets customers talk to each other.
Think of a village shop. The sign outside and the entry in the local directory are search: they help someone who is looking. The till-side notebook where regulars leave their address for a monthly note is email: they asked for it. The Saturday coffee morning where customers swap tips is the community: the shopkeeper hosts, but the customers do the talking.
Trouble starts when a channel is asked to do another's job. Emailing people who never asked is spam. A community used as an advertising board goes quiet. Search content written for the shop and not for the searcher is not found.
If the whole plan feels like too much, start with one channel. Pick the one you will use most, write its job in a sentence, and name the single number that would show it working. The rest of the plan can follow that.
Key terms in this module
- Search engine optimisation (SEO)
- Improving content and a website so that they appear for relevant searches without paying for each click.
- Paid search
- Adverts shown against search results, usually paid for each click.
- Search intent
- What the person searching is trying to do: learn something, find a particular site, compare options or buy.
- Email segmentation
- Dividing an email list into groups so that each group gets messages that suit it.
- Welcome series
- A short sequence of automated emails sent to new subscribers or customers.
- Online community
- A group of people who interact with each other, not just with the brand, around a shared interest.
- Moderation
- Setting and enforcing the rules for a community's conversations.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Briefing Creative and Managing Agencies
Why it matters. Bad briefs waste more marketing money than bad ideas. Writing a clear brief and managing the people who answer it is what turns a plan into a campaign. Most marketing work is made by other people: agencies, freelancers, in-house designers and, increasingly, AI tools. What comes back depends on what you asked for and how you ran the relationship. This is where the marketing manager's job starts to show, and where leadership first becomes a skill: you set direction for people you don't manage. You'll finish the Practitioner stage with Milestone 2, a campaign plan that pulls together your work from Module 7, Module 8, Module 9 and this one.
Progress marker: I can write a creative brief, manage the people making the work, and write a campaign plan. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Creative Brief and Campaign Plan Builder, and Lesson 10.5 needs the brief, the agency scope and the AI rules from the lessons before it. If a brief is due this week, read the worked example, then go straight to Lesson 10.1. If work has already come back and you're unsure what to say about it, start at Lesson 10.2. If you have no agency, plan for a freelancer or an in-house designer instead; every task works the same way.
Creative Brief and Campaign Plan Builder
Milestone 2: your creative brief, agency or freelancer scope and timeline, how you'll judge the work, and the full campaign plan with channels, budget and KPIs, as one printable document.
10.1Writing a Brief
A creative brief is a short document that tells a creative team the problem, the audience, the single most important message and what success looks like. Read the worked example later in this topic before you start: it shows Maya Collins's brief for Larkfield.
A brief is a question, not a set of instructions. The clearer the question, the better the answers. If you tell a designer exactly what to make, you get what you imagined, at best. If you tell them the problem, they may solve it in a way you hadn't thought of.
The parts of a brief.
- The problem: what's wrong or missing, in one or two sentences. Use your strategic audit from Module 6.
- The objective: the number that should move, with its baseline, target and date. This comes from your communications plan in Module 7.
- The audience: one target, described as a person. Use your segment and persona from Module 3, and say where they are on their path to purchase.
- The single-minded proposition: the one thing the communication must leave the audience believing or feeling. It grows from your proposition in Module 4, but it is a single message told in a way people remember, not a list of benefits.
- Mandatories: what must or mustn't appear. Legal wording, a logo, a claim you can't make. Your fix list from Module 5 belongs here.
- Budget: what the fee or production line is, and what it has to cover.
- Timing: dates for concepts, final work and launch.
- Success: how you'll know the work did its job, and who will judge it.
Keep it to one page. The longer a brief, the less of it gets read.
Test the single-minded proposition. Could someone repeat it after one viewing? Does it contain only one idea? Is it true, and can you prove it? If you need "and" twice, you have more than one message.
UK example: the IPA's briefing guidance. The IPA (the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising) publishes Briefing an Agency best practice guide, listed on its website with a date of 21 February 2013. It covers the principles of a good brief, why a written brief matters but is not enough on its own, the role of the briefing meeting, and written briefing forms. A newer IPA guide, The best way for a client to brief an agency, was written by BetterBriefs and Mark Ritson in partnership with the IPA, and launched at the IPA Business Growth Conference on 6 July 2022. The lesson from both is the same: a brief is a conversation as well as a document. Check the IPA's website for current versions.
10.2Judging Creative Work
The work comes back. Now you have to say what you think, and that is harder than it sounds, because everyone has taste and taste is not a measure.
Judge against the brief. Put the brief next to the work and ask four questions:
- Does it answer the problem?
- Will the target audience understand it, not just you?
- Does it say the single-minded proposition, clearly and once?
- Does it meet the mandatories, including anything legal?
"I don't like it" isn't feedback. "It's too cold for an audience who are meant to feel looked after" is, because it points to a reason in the brief that the creative team can act on.
Feedback that works. Make it specific, kind and actionable. Say what works first, because the team needs to know what to keep. Then name the gap against the brief. Then, if you can, say what would close it, without drawing the solution yourself. "The headline reads as two ideas; the brief asks for one" lets the team find the fix. "Change the headline to this" takes the problem back from them.
One voice. If five people give feedback separately, the team gets five contradictory messages. Agree who collects comments, settles disagreements and sends one set. That is usually the person who manages the work day to day. The person who signs off decides, but they hear from the team through one channel.
When to say no. Sometimes the work doesn't answer the brief, and the right response is to say so clearly. Do it early, against the brief, not at the last round. If you're changing your mind about what you want, that is a new brief, and it may cost money. Say so honestly.
Rounds of amends cost something. Contracts usually limit them (more in Lesson 10.3). Collect all your feedback into one round, not a drip of small changes, so you don't use up rounds on things you could have said together.
10.3Choosing and Managing Agencies and Freelancers
You can't make everything yourself. Who you choose, and how you run the relationship, decides whether your brief becomes good work.
Choosing. Look at four things:
- Fit: have they solved a problem like yours, for a customer like yours?
- Chemistry: can you disagree honestly with these people? You'll need to.
- Capacity: who will actually do the work?
- Cost: what does the fee include, and what doesn't it?
To pitch or not. A formal pitch has agencies compete with sample ideas, which costs them and you a lot of time. For a small project, a chat and a look at past work is often enough. If you ask for ideas, say whether they are paid for.
Scope of work. The scope of work is what an agency or freelancer is contracted to deliver, by when and for what fee. A statement of work is the document that records it. Write down:
- Deliverables: each item, with its format. "Social assets" is vague; "12 social assets" is a scope.
- Fee: fixed or by the hour, and what it covers.
- Amends: how many rounds are included, and what happens after.
- Timeline: dates for each stage, including your own feedback.
- Owner: one named person each side.
Amends are changes requested after creative work is presented. Contracts usually include a set number of rounds. After that, changes cost extra. Clear feedback against the brief makes the included rounds enough.
Intellectual property and usage. Under UK copyright law the creator is generally the first owner, unless they made it as an employee in the course of their job. Paying doesn't make you the owner unless they assign it to you in writing. Agree in writing who owns the finished work, and where and for how long you may use it, including any music or stock images in it. This is general information, not legal advice; for a big contract, ask a solicitor.
Running the relationship.
- One owner on your side, the single voice from Lesson 10.2.
- Short, regular check-ins, not one long meeting at the end.
- Honest reviews in both directions.
- Pay on time, and say when you're delayed.
Leadership: setting direction for people you don't manage. You can't tell an agency what to do as you would a colleague. You can give a clear brief, a fair scope, quick decisions and honest feedback.
Retrieval. In Module 7 you split a budget into working spend (buying media) and non-working spend (making and managing the work). An agency fee is non-working spend. That isn't wasteful: strong work makes the working money go further. The test is whether the fee buys what the objective needs.
10.4AI in Creative Production
AI tools now draft copy, vary images and suggest ideas in seconds. You met the wider rules in Module 5; this lesson applies them to creative work.
Where AI helps.
- Ideas: a wide spread of starting points to react to.
- Variations: the same message in different lengths, tones or formats.
- Drafts: a first version to improve, not a finished piece.
- Critique: a second reader for your brief.
The limits.
- Accuracy: AI can state false things confidently, so every claim needs a human check against your evidence.
- Sameness: tools trained on existing work tend to produce what's common. Your audience may have seen it.
- Rights: who owns AI output, and whether the training behind it respected others' work, is unsettled (see below).
- Likeness: don't generate images or voices of real people without their agreement. An AI depiction of a real person can suggest an endorsement they never gave.
- Confidentiality: don't paste personal data or confidential material into a public tool.
Copyright and AI in the UK. Section 9(3) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 says the author of a computer-generated work is the person who made the arrangements for its creation. How that applies to AI output is unclear. The government consulted on copyright and AI from December 2024 to February 2025. In its Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence (18 March 2026) it proposed removing this protection for computer-generated works, while saying copyright should continue to protect works created with AI assistance. That is a proposal, not yet law, so check GOV.UK for where it stands before you rely on it. Don't assume you own a purely AI-generated image, and ask your agency whether and how they use AI.
Advertising rules still apply. The ASA and CAP, which regulate UK advertising, say the Codes have no AI-specific rules but apply however an ad is made. In a CAP News article of 29 May 2025, they note there is no general legal duty in the UK to disclose that AI was used. They suggest two questions: would the audience be misled without a disclosure, and if so, does the disclosure clarify the message or contradict it? A label won't fix a misleading claim. You are responsible for your ad whoever, or whatever, made it.
AI activity. Give an AI assistant your creative brief, with no personal or confidential data, and ask it to critique the brief and suggest three creative routes. Then judge the routes against your brief, using the four questions from Lesson 10.2. Note which suggestions you rejected and why. Keep the critique, the three routes and your notes in your portfolio: they show your judgement.
10.5Milestone 2: The Campaign Plan
Milestone 2 closes the Practitioner stage. A campaign plan is one document setting out a campaign's objective, audience, message, channels, budget, timeline and how it will be measured. It pulls together your work from Module 7, Module 8, Module 9 and this one. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it shows Maya's plan for Larkfield.
The sections, each drawn from earlier work:
| Section | From |
|---|---|
| Objective and KPIs, with baselines | Your audit and baselines, topic 6, and your objective, topic 7 |
| Audience and path | Your target, persona and path, topic 3 |
| Message | Your proposition, topic 4, and the single-minded proposition from this topic |
| Channels and content | Your channel plan, topic 7, and your content and channels, topic 8 and topic 9 |
| Journey fixes | Your UX fix list, topic 8 |
| Budget by line | Your budget split, topic 7 |
| Creative and who makes it | Your brief and scope, this topic |
| Timeline | Your scope and your channel dates |
| Measurement | One KPI per channel, with a baseline and a target |
Make the sections agree. A plan fails most often at the joins. The objective in section one should be the objective in the brief. The money for production should match the fee in your scope. Every channel should have a KPI, and every KPI should lead back to the objective. Check each join before you call the plan finished.
Name the risks. What could go wrong, and what would you do? Late creative, a channel that underperforms, a claim that can't be supported. One line each is enough.
Leadership: bring people with you. The plan is only useful if the people who have to act on it understand it. Your manager, finance, the agency and your colleagues each need to see their part. Write the one-sentence version of the plan first and check that each of them could repeat it.
Looking ahead. The measures in this plan are what you'll judge the campaign by later in the course, so choose them with that in mind. Your baselines are the yardstick.
Larkfield's Brief and Campaign Plan
Larkfield Coffee Roasters, its figures and Northlight Studio, the Nottingham agency it briefs, are fictional. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, writes the brief and signs off the work; Leo Grant, the digital marketing executive, runs it day to day.
The brief, from Lesson 10.1.
| Part | Maya's brief |
|---|---|
| Problem | About 90 join and 90 leave each month, so subscribers stay at 1,800 |
| Objective | 1,800 to 2,100 active subscribers by 30 November 2026 (net +300) |
| Audience | Home Brew Enthusiasts: Jordan, 29, Nottingham, at the compare stage, weighing roast date, origin and price per bag |
| Proposition | "Coffee this fresh only comes from a roaster who posts it the week it's roasted" |
| Mandatories | Show the roast date; no claim Larkfield can't support (Module 5) |
| Budget and timing | £6,000 fixed fee; brief 1 July 2026, concepts 15 July, final assets 15 August, launch 1 September |
The scope. One 30-second hero video, 12 social assets and 3 email templates, two rounds of amends. Leo channels all feedback.
The plan, from Lesson 10.5.
| Section | Maya's plan |
|---|---|
| Objective and KPIs | +300 subscribers; baselines of about 90 joiners and 90 leavers a month and 30% sign-up completion |
| Audience and message | Home Brew Enthusiasts; the proposition above |
| Channels and content | Paid social, paid search, sampling; weekly "Roasted This Week" note; welcome series; skip or pause reminders; Brew Club |
| Journey fixes | Three-step sign-up with guest checkout; target completion 40% |
| Budget | £30,000: social £12,000, search £6,000, production £6,000, sampling £4,000, contingency £2,000 |
| Timeline | The brief's dates; campaign ends 30 November |
| Measurement | £100 per extra subscriber (£30,000 ÷ 300); from Module 9: organic search sign-ups, the welcome series' second-order rate, and Brew Club members posting in their first month, each baselined on month one |
The joins. The objective matches the brief; the £6,000 production line is the fee. Search, email and Brew Club have KPIs; paid social, paid search and sampling don't yet, so Maya adds them before finishing. Maya's named risk, late or off-brief concepts, is checked against the brief on 15 July, with £2,000 contingency. Whether £100 is affordable depends on a subscriber's worth, which the course works out later.
Knowledge Check
A manager's brief says: "Make us look modern, premium, friendly, affordable and local, and appeal to everyone." What is wrong with it, and what would you do first?
It has no single-minded proposition and no one audience, so the agency can't answer a question it hasn't been asked; choose one audience and one message you can prove, and write that in a sentence before anything else.A director looks at a poster and says, "I just don't like it." As the person who manages the agency, how do you turn that into feedback?
Ask which part of the brief it fails: does it answer the problem, will the target audience understand it, does it say the proposition clearly, and does it meet the mandatories? Then pass on one specific comment, saying what to keep and what gap to close.A freelancer's contract gives you two rounds of amends. You send small changes by email over three weeks. What goes wrong, and what should you do?
You use up the rounds a little at a time and then face extra costs; collect all comments into one set per round, sent by one person, and check them against the brief first.You pay a designer for a logo. Nothing is written about ownership. Who owns it, and what should you do?
In the UK the creator is generally the first owner unless they were an employee making it in the course of their job or have agreed in writing to assign it, so paying doesn't settle it; agree ownership and usage rights in writing before the work starts, and ask a solicitor if the contract is important. This isn't legal advice.In Module 7 you split budgets into working and non-working spend. A £15,000 campaign has a £3,000 agency fee and £12,000 of media. Is the fee wasted?
The fee is non-working spend, 20% of the budget, but it isn't wasted if it buys work that makes the £12,000 of media more effective; judge it against the objective, and be cautious if the fee were so large that too little was left to put the work in front of people.An AI tool produces a striking image for your campaign, and a colleague says "just add a label saying it's AI and we're covered". What do you tell them?
ASA and CAP guidance is that the ad rules apply however it was made, and a label won't cure a misleading claim; check the image doesn't mislead, check who owns it, and don't treat a disclosure as a fix.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: the IPA's page "Briefing an Agency best practice guide" (ipa.co.uk/document/briefing-an-agency-best-practice-guide, dated 21 February 2013) describes the guide and links to the download. The IPA's "The best way for a client to brief an agency" (ipa.co.uk/knowledge/documents/the-best-way-for-a-client-to-brief-an-agency), written by BetterBriefs and Mark Ritson in partnership with the IPA and launched on 6 July 2022, is its newer guide. Check the IPA website for current versions.
- AI and advertising rules: the ASA's CAP News article "Disclosure of AI in Advertising: Striking the Balance Between Creativity and Responsibility" (asa.org.uk, 29 May 2025) sets out the two questions about disclosure. In 2026 the ASA added guidance on AI and deepfakes, including AI depictions of real people that suggest a false endorsement; check asa.org.uk for the latest.
- AI and copyright: the GOV.UK page "Report and impact assessment on copyright and artificial intelligence" (gov.uk/government/publications/report-and-impact-assessment-on-copyright-and-artificial-intelligence, 18 March 2026) sets out the government's current position, following its consultation "Copyright and artificial intelligence" (December 2024 to February 2025). The law may change; this isn't legal advice.
- Copyright basics: the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 is on legislation.gov.uk; the Intellectual Property Office's guidance on GOV.UK explains ownership in plain language.
- Further practice: give your brief to someone who knows nothing about your organisation, ask them to say the single-minded proposition back, and note what they missed. Then print the Creative Brief and Campaign Plan Builder as Milestone 2.
Your Brief and Your Campaign Plan
- What I made: my creative brief, my judging criteria, my agency or freelancer scope and timeline, my rules for AI, and my campaign plan, all saved in the Creative Brief and Campaign Plan Builder.
- How I'd give feedback on work I didn't like: what I'd say first, which part of the brief I'd point to, and who would send it.
- What I'd brief differently next time, and what I'd ask the agency or freelancer to tell me about their process.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. Then look back over the whole Practitioner stage: which marker moved most, and which still sits at "not yet"?
- Choose what to do next: share your brief with someone for feedback and revise it, or start the Commercial stage, where you follow the money through routes to market, loyalty and a second country.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
A brief is a question, not a set of instructions. Think of asking a taxi driver for directions. "Turn left, then right, then left" works only if you know the roads, and it breaks the moment one is closed. "Take me to the station, I need to be there by half past" lets the driver choose the route, and use what they know.
A brief works the same way. Say where you need to get to (the objective), who is travelling (the audience) and what must be true when you arrive (the single-minded proposition). Then let the team choose the route.
Feedback is the same idea in reverse. "Go left here" is an instruction. "That road is longer than the brief allows" is a reason the driver can use.
If the whole topic feels like too much, start small. Write the problem in one sentence, the audience in one sentence and the message in one sentence. Ask someone to say them back to you. If they can, you have the heart of a brief. The rest is detail to add around it.
The usual misconception is that a longer brief is a better brief. It isn't. One clear page that can be read in two minutes beats ten pages nobody finishes.
Key terms in this module
- Creative brief
- A short document that tells a creative team the problem, the audience, the single most important message and what success looks like.
- Single-minded proposition
- The one thing the communication must leave the audience believing or feeling.
- Scope of work
- What an agency or freelancer is contracted to deliver, by when and for what fee.
- Amends
- Changes requested to creative work after it's presented; contracts usually limit how many rounds are included.
- Statement of work
- A document setting out the scope, deliverables, timeline, fees and responsibilities for a piece of agency work.
- Campaign plan
- One document setting out a campaign's objective, audience, message, channels, budget, timeline and how it will be measured.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Ecommerce and Routes to Market
Why it matters. Selling more isn't the same as earning more. Knowing what each route to market leaves you with, after every cost, is what lets you grow without going broke. Your earlier topics built the proposition, the price and the communications that bring people in. This topic follows the money from there: which routes your organisation sells through, how well its online selling works, and what each sale really earns. By the end you'll compare routes to market on contribution per unit and choose which to grow, test or decline.
Progress marker: I can compare routes to market on what each sale really earns. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order; the Route-to-Market Profit Calculator fills up as you go. If a route has been offered to you and you need to decide, read the worked example, then start at Lesson 11.3 and come back to the others. If your online shop is the worry, start at Lesson 11.2.
Route-to-Market Profit Calculator
Enter the price and costs for up to three routes side by side and see the contribution per unit, the contribution margin and the units each route must sell to earn the same as your best route.
11.1Routes to Market
A route to market is the path a product takes to reach the buyer. It makes place, one of the 7Ps from Module 4, concrete: who sells your product, and who controls the sale.
The main routes.
| Route | What it is | Control | Reach | Customer data | Cost to you |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct to consumer (DTC) | Your own shop, site or app | Most: price, presentation, service | Only people you can attract | You keep it | Marketing, delivery, payment fees |
| Online marketplace | A platform where many sellers list products | Less: the platform sets the rules | Large, existing shopper base | Mostly the platform's | A fee on each sale, plus fulfilment |
| Retailer | A shop or grocer buys or lists your product | Little: they set the shelf price and layout | Many shoppers, in person and online | Mostly the retailer's | The retailer keeps a margin |
| Wholesale | You sell to businesses that resell or use the product | Some: terms are negotiated | Through each customer | Business customer only | Lower price per unit, larger orders |
| Social commerce | Selling inside a social platform | Less: the platform sets the rules | Where your audience already spends time | Partly shared with the platform | Platform terms and fees vary |
Read the table as trade-offs, not a ranking. Control and data usually fall as reach rises, and fees and rules change, so check them at the source.
With direct to consumer you also carry the work of bringing people to your shop, which is the marketing you planned in Module 7. A marketplace gives you shoppers who are already looking, but takes a fee and puts you beside rivals. A retailer keeps a share of the shelf price, called the retailer margin: you trade some of the price for reach you couldn't afford alone.
UK example: Graze. Graze began as an online snack-box subscription business. In spring 2015 it ran a trial in Boots stores, and in July 2015, the trade press reported, its first shop range launched in Sainsbury's, Boots and WHSmith Travel. Unilever bought Graze in February 2019 and sold it to Katjes International in a deal announced in December 2025 and completed in February 2026. A business that started direct chose to add a route with different reach, control and economics.
Your organisation's routes. Most organisations use two or three routes and ignore the rest. Larkfield Coffee Roasters (fictional, with illustrative figures) sells through its own online shop, wholesale to cafés, and farm shops and delis. It doesn't use an online marketplace yet.
11.2Ecommerce Essentials
Whatever mix of routes you choose, your own online shop is the one you control. Run it well, because everything else is measured against it. This lesson is a quick audit of the basics.
Product pages. The page has to answer the questions a buyer would ask in a shop. Clear photos that show the real product, a plain description in the customer's words, the price including anything extra, and what's included. Put the main action, such as "Add to basket", where a thumb can reach it. Use the usability checks from Module 8: clear labels, one obvious next step and a layout that works on a phone first.
Checkout. Checkout is a journey like the sign-up you mapped in the UX topic, and it loses people in the same ways. Offer guest checkout, ask only for what you need, show the full cost before payment, and explain errors where they happen. The consent rules from Module 5 still apply here: no pre-ticked marketing boxes.
Delivery promises. Say when the order will arrive, what delivery costs and who carries it, before the customer pays. Then keep the promise. A delivery promise is part of your proposition; for Larkfield it is "at your door within three days of roasting". Late or vague delivery is one of the quickest ways to lose a repeat buyer.
Returns and refunds. Make the returns policy easy to find and written in plain English. In the UK, buyers who purchase online generally have a right to cancel within 14 days, with exceptions such as goods that deteriorate rapidly. The rules sit in the Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013, and the exceptions differ by product, so check what applies to yours. This isn't legal advice.
Customer service. Say how to reach a person and how fast you reply. Questions people ask often belong on the product page.
Genuine reviews. Reviews help buyers decide, and they are one of the reasons marketplaces work. You met the fake reviews rules in the regulation topic. Since 6 April 2025, the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 bans fake reviews, including paying for reviews without saying so. The CMA published guidance on the ban in April 2025. The safe approach is simple: ask real customers for honest reviews, publish the bad ones as well as the good, and never write or buy reviews.
The one-journey check. Pick one product and buy it on your organisation's site, on a phone, as a new customer. Score it on what you find: the page, the checkout, the delivery promise, the returns policy, how to get help and the reviews.
11.3Channel Economics
Read the worked example later in this topic first: it works one figure through all three routes.
Revenue isn't profit. A sale through a marketplace or a retailer can look like growth while earning far less than the same sale through your own shop. The price the customer sees isn't what you keep. To compare routes you need the contribution per unit: the price the customer pays, minus the costs that come with each sale. Those costs are the product itself, the fee or margin the route takes, delivery and fulfilment, and payment fees.
Four questions for one sale.
- What does the customer pay?
- What does the product cost to make and pack?
- What does the route take: a marketplace fee, a retailer margin, delivery or payment costs?
- What's left?
What's left is the contribution. It goes towards costs you pay regardless of volume, such as salaries and rent, and then profit. Contribution margin is that contribution as a share of the price the customer pays. Module 12 builds on it with lifetime value.
Fees and margins you can't see. You often don't know a marketplace's fee for your category or a retailer's margin. Look up the marketplace's own seller fee page, or ask the retailer, and until you have it use a stated assumption, labelled as one. For retailers, work from the shelf price: if they keep 35% of £8.00, you receive the other 65%.
VAT. If your product carries VAT, take it out of the price first, because VAT goes to HMRC, not to you. Larkfield's roasted coffee is assumed to be zero-rated in the UK, so its prices carry none. Check your own product's rate on GOV.UK.
What the number leaves out. Contribution per unit shows what a sale earns once it happens. It doesn't include the marketing needed to win the sale. Read the contribution beside the reach: how many sales each route can realistically deliver.
Retrieval: choose the measure. In Module 6 you set baselines before judging change. A route decision needs the same discipline. Before you grow a route, note the baseline you'll measure it against: orders, contribution per order, and orders from new customers.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to summarise a real marketplace's seller fees for your product category. Then check every figure against the marketplace's own official fee page, with the date. Record what the AI got wrong or out of date, and whether it presented any figure with more confidence than the page justifies. Then decide which fee figure you'd use and label it an assumption, or confirm it from the page.
11.4Choosing the Mix
Having worked out what each route earns, you now decide which to grow, which to test and which to decline. The numbers inform the decision. They don't make it.
Grow, test or decline. For each route, ask three things.
- Does it earn enough per sale to be worth the effort, once every cost is counted?
- Does it reach people you can't reach another way, or only people you already sell to?
- Can you serve it well, with stock, delivery and customer service, without harming the routes that already work?
A route with strong contribution and proven demand is one to grow. A route that looks promising but has gaps in the evidence is one to test, small, with a baseline and an end date. A route that earns too little or puts the brand at risk is one to decline, for now. Saying no to a route is a decision, and worth writing down with the reason.
Channel conflict. Channel conflict is tension between your own routes. It shows up in three ways.
- Price: one route sells at a lower price than another and pulls customers across.
- Availability: a product is on every route, so no route feels special.
- Brand control: a partner presents the product in ways you wouldn't, from the photo to the description.
The fix isn't always a policy of identical prices. It might be a product only one route carries, such as a gift set, or a clear difference in what each route offers.
Leadership: making a call others may not like. A route decision usually has someone who wants a yes. A sales colleague likes the big listing; a customer service lead worries about new complaints. Lead the decision by showing the numbers, saying what you assumed, giving the reason for the choice and saying what would change your mind. People can disagree with a call and still trust how it was made.
Larkfield's Three Routes
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, wants to know what a 250g bag earns on each route before anyone gets excited about reach. She starts from the £9.50 one-off price; roasted coffee is assumed zero-rated for VAT.
The 12% marketplace fee and 35% retailer margin are assumptions; Maya would replace them with real terms.
| £ per bag | Own shop | Marketplace | Grocery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer pays (shelf price for grocery) | 9.50 | 9.50 | 8.00 |
| Retailer margin (assumed 35%) | n/a | n/a | -2.80 |
| Marketplace fee (assumed 12%) | n/a | -1.14 | n/a |
| Coffee and bag | -3.40 | -3.40 | -3.40 |
| Pick, pack and post, or fulfilment | -1.60 | -1.80 | -0.40 |
| Payment fees | -0.20 | n/a | n/a |
| Contribution | 4.30 | 3.16 | 1.40 |
| Margin on price paid | 45.3% | 33.3% | 17.5% |
The marketplace fee is 12% of £9.50 = £1.14. The retailer keeps 35% of £8.00 = £2.80, so Larkfield receives £5.20; the grocery column's last cost is distribution of £0.40.
The subscription bag. A subscriber pays £8.50. Two bags share one £1.80 parcel, so postage is £0.90 a bag: £8.50 - £3.40 - £0.90 - £0.20 = £4.00. Two bags a month gives £8.00 a month per subscriber, used in Module 12.
Bags to match 100 own-shop bags (£430): marketplace £430 ÷ £3.16, about 137; grocery £430 ÷ £1.40, about 308.
What Maya notices. The marketplace earns £1.14 less per bag than the own shop. The grocery listing earns less than a third of the own shop's contribution, and its £8.00 shelf price undercuts both the £9.50 one-off and the £8.50 subscription price, which invites channel conflict.
The decision. Maya stays led by the own shop, tests the marketplace for gift boxes only, and declines the grocery listing for now.
- Own shop first: it earns most per bag.
- Marketplace test: gift buying is concentrated before Christmas, and Gift Buyers are the secondary target from Module 3. She checks gift-box costs and sets a baseline first.
- Grocery declined: low contribution and less control over price.
In the Route-to-Market Profit Calculator, enter the three routes and read down the contribution row.
Knowledge Check
A seller lists a £20 candle on a marketplace. Product cost is £8, delivery and fulfilment £3.50, and the marketplace fee is assumed to be 10%. What is the contribution per candle and the contribution margin?
The fee is £2.00, so the contribution is £20 - £8 - £2 - £3.50 = £6.50 and the margin is £6.50 ÷ £20 = 32.5%; the 10% is an assumption to confirm on the marketplace's own fee page.A producer's product has a shelf price of £5.00 in a supermarket, an assumed retailer margin of 40%, product cost of £2.00 and distribution of £0.30 a unit. What does the producer earn per unit?
The retailer keeps £2.00, so the producer receives £3.00, and £3.00 - £2.00 - £0.30 leaves £0.70 per unit; margin on the shelf price is 14%.A manager says the marketplace is the best route because it sold three times as many units as the own shop. What do you ask before agreeing?
What each sale contributes after the fee and fulfilment, because three times the units at a much lower contribution can earn less in total, and revenue isn't profit.A brand sells on its own site and through a retailer, and the retailer's shelf price is lower than the brand's own. Name the conflict and one way to ease it.
This is price conflict, as customers switch to the cheaper route; ease it by giving each route something different, such as a pack size or gift set that only one carries, rather than competing on the same item.A friend says reviews on their shop are not worth the risk of bad ones, so they ask staff to post five-star reviews. What is wrong?
Fake reviews are banned under the DMCC Act 2024 from 6 April 2025; ask real customers for honest reviews and publish the critical ones too.An AI assistant says a marketplace takes a particular fee for your category. What do you do before using it in a decision?
Check it against the marketplace's own official fee page, note the date, and record anything the AI got wrong or out of date; use the figure as a labelled assumption until it is confirmed.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: Retail Week, "Graze launches into UK shops as next step in expansion plans" and Confectionery News, "Online snacks business Graze ramps up UK retail presence with Tesco and Asda listings" (4 December 2015); Unilever's own news pages for the February 2019 acquisition and the later sale to Katjes International.
- Fake reviews: Competition and Markets Authority, "Fake reviews guidance" (CMA208, 4 April 2025), on GOV.UK; it explains the ban under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024.
- Returns and cancellation: The Consumer Contracts (Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges) Regulations 2013 on legislation.gov.uk, where regulation 28 lists the circumstances that exclude cancellation; Citizens Advice and GOV.UK give plain-English summaries. This isn't legal advice.
- VAT on food: HMRC, "Food products (VAT Notice 701/14)" on GOV.UK, which sets out which food is zero-rated and which is standard-rated; check your own product there.
- Marketplace fees: the marketplace's own seller fee page for your category. Date what you read and use only the figures it states.
- Further practice: complete the Route-to-Market Profit Calculator for one product and keep the result in your portfolio. It feeds the route you choose in Module 13.
Your Routes and the Route I'd Test
- What I made: a list of my organisation's routes and ones it could use, a one-journey ecommerce check, contribution per unit for up to three routes in the Route-to-Market Profit Calculator, and a route decision with reasons.
- The cost I'd missed before I worked it through, and the route I'd test and what I'd measure.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- Choose what to do next: check one assumed cost with someone who knows, such as a fee on the marketplace's own page or a retailer's terms, or move on to the next topic.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Follow one sale, in four steps.
Picture a £10 bag of coffee. Step one: the customer hands over £10. Step two: take away what it cost to make and pack, say £3. Step three: take away what the route takes, such as a fee for the platform or a share for the shop, and what it costs to post or deliver. Step four: what's left is the contribution. That is the money the sale really earns.
Now do the same sum for each route. The shop you run yourself keeps the most. A platform keeps a slice. A supermarket keeps a bigger slice and may also set the price. The bag and the customer's money are the same each time. The part you keep differs.
The usual misconception is that more sales means more money. It only does if each extra sale leaves enough behind after the route has taken its share. If the whole topic feels too much, take one product and one extra route you've heard of, and do the four steps once, with every guess labelled as a guess.
Key terms in this module
- Route to market
- The path a product takes to reach the buyer, such as the organisation's own online shop, an online marketplace, retailers or wholesalers.
- Direct to consumer (DTC)
- Selling straight to end customers through channels the organisation controls, without a retailer in between.
- Online marketplace
- A platform where many sellers list products and the platform takes a fee on each sale.
- Contribution margin
- What's left from a sale after the costs that come with that sale (product cost, fees, delivery), before fixed costs; it contributes to covering overheads and profit.
- Retailer margin
- The share of the shelf price a retailer keeps.
- Channel conflict
- Tension when an organisation's routes to market compete with each other, for example on price.
Thanks. Good to hear.
CRM, Customer Experience and Loyalty
Why it matters. Every customer who leaves has to be replaced before you can grow. Keeping more of them is often the cheapest growth you'll ever find. Most marketing effort goes on winning customers, and customer lifetime value shows why that can be the wrong way round. This topic pulls together what you learned about customers in Module 2, the permission rules from Module 5 and the contribution figures from Module 11. You'll map what happens after a purchase, plan how to use customer data lawfully, work out what a loyal customer is worth and judge whether a loyalty scheme earns its cost.
Progress marker: I can work out what a loyal customer is worth and plan how to keep more of them. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: the experience, CRM and loyalty lessons each end in a written task for your portfolio, and the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator does the sums for the lifetime value lesson. If you've been asked "what is a customer worth to us?", read the worked example first and start with Lesson 12.3. If your organisation sells once and rarely again, you still do every task: the lifetime value lesson shows how to adapt the sum. Where you have no internal figures, use public information and label every estimate as one.
Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator
Enter what a customer pays and contributes each month and your churn rate, and see their expected lifetime, their lifetime value and what a lower churn rate would be worth across your customer base.
12.1The Experience After Purchase
Winning a customer ends at the payment. What they feel next decides whether they come back. That run of moments, from the box arriving to the day they cancel, is the customer experience (CX): the sum of a customer's interactions with an organisation and how they feel about them.
Map the stages. List what happens after the purchase, in order:
- delivery or access: does it arrive when and how they were told?
- first use: can they get started without help?
- service: what happens when they have a question?
- problems: how are mistakes put right?
- changing or leaving: can they pause, switch or cancel without a fight?
Find the pain points. A pain point is a moment that causes frustration, effort or doubt. You find them by listening, not guessing: the reasons customers give for leaving, complaints and reviews, questions to your service team, and watching one customer try something while you stay quiet. You did this kind of listening in the customer research topic, and the reasons people give for leaving are the best map you'll get.
Moments that matter. Not every stage weighs the same. People remember the first use, the moment something went wrong and the way out. Fix those first.
Ethics. A customer should be able to leave as easily as they joined. Making cancellation hard keeps customers who resent you, and the regulation topic showed it can break consumer law too.
UK example: Club Pret. Pret A Manger launched a coffee subscription in September 2020 at £20 a month for up to five barista-made drinks a day, as ITV reported on 4 September 2020. By 2024 the subscription was called Club Pret and cost £30 a month. In July 2024, Restaurant Online reported that from 3 September 2024 Pret would replace it with a version giving 50% off up to five barista-made drinks a day, at an introductory £5 a month rising to £10 from 1 April 2025. On 11 February 2025, Restaurant Online reported that Pret had dropped the rise and would keep the price at £5. Pret's own Club Pret page, checked in November 2026, describes £5 a month for 50% off up to five hot or iced barista-made drinks a day, with the app used to claim, and says members can pause or cancel any time. Terms like these change often, so check the page before you quote it. The lesson isn't which price was right. A subscription's economics, what it costs to give each perk, and customers' reactions when the deal changes all shape how long people stay.
12.2CRM: Using What You Know About Customers
Customer relationship management (CRM) is the strategy, processes and systems an organisation uses to manage its relationships with customers. A CRM system is only the tool. The real work is deciding what to know, why, and what to do with it.
What data, and what you may use. List what your organisation holds about customers: contact details, what they bought and when, how they found you, and what they've said to your service team. Then check what you may do with each item. The regulation topic set the rules: use data for the purpose people were told about, collect only what you need, and respect consent and the soft opt-in. Not legal advice: the ICO is the regulator to check with. A customer record with no clear reason to hold it is a risk, not an asset.
Simple segments. You met segmentation in the customer topics and in email. For CRM, three questions about behaviour go a long way:
- Recency: how recently did they buy or engage?
- Frequency: how often?
- Value: how much have they spent, or contributed?
Someone who bought last week, often, with high value is a different customer from someone who bought once a year ago. Start with these three before anything cleverer.
Lifecycle messages. A lifecycle message is sent because of where someone is in their relationship with you, not because of a date in the marketing calendar. You built email sequences in the search, email and communities topic. Four lifecycle moments cover most organisations:
- Welcome: after a first purchase, set expectations and help them get value.
- First repeat: nudge a second purchase, which is when many customers decide whether to stay.
- At risk: a customer whose behaviour is slipping, such as longer gaps or repeated skips, gets a helpful message, not a guilt trip.
- Win-back: a lapsed customer is asked once, kindly, whether they want to return, and given an easy way to say no.
Each message needs a lawful basis to send, a single job and a way to stop. Say what the data showed, not what you assume about the person.
12.3Customer Lifetime Value and Retention
Customer lifetime value (CLV) is the contribution an organisation expects from a customer over the whole relationship. It tells you how much a customer is worth keeping, and so how much you can sensibly spend to win or keep one. Retention rate is the share of customers who stay over a period. Churn is its opposite: the share who leave.
Use contribution, not revenue. You met contribution margin in the routes to market topic: what is left from a sale after the costs that vary with it. Revenue overstates a customer's worth because it ignores the cost of the coffee, the packaging and the postage. A customer paying £17.00 a month who costs £9.00 to serve is worth £8.00 a month, and £8.00 is the number that pays for marketing.
The simple formula. For a subscription or any regular customer:
- Expected lifetime in months = 1 ÷ monthly churn rate.
- CLV = contribution per month × expected lifetime.
At 5% monthly churn the expected lifetime is 1 ÷ 0.05 = 20 months. That is an average: some customers leave in a month, some stay for years.
What it assumes. The formula is a simplification. It assumes churn stays steady month to month, that contribution per customer doesn't change, and that every customer is alike. Real churn is usually highest in the first months. Use CLV to compare options and to size a decision, not as a promise. Say what you assumed whenever you show it.
For a business with no subscription. If customers buy now and then, replace months with years: contribution per purchase × purchases per year × expected years as a customer. Label each as an estimate until you have data.
What a lower churn rate is worth. Small changes in churn have a large effect: expected lifetime is 1 ÷ churn, so each point off a low churn rate adds more months, and the gain applies to every customer. Work out CLV at the current churn and at the target, take the difference, and multiply by the number of customers. That gives the value of the retention change across the base.
Read the worked example first. It shows every step for Larkfield. Then try the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator with your own figures.
12.4Loyalty: Schemes, Rewards and Ethics
A loyalty scheme is a programme that rewards customers for repeat purchases or engagement. It isn't the same as real loyalty. A customer may collect points because the reward is good, while still switching the moment a competitor is cheaper. Real loyalty is a customer who chooses you again because the experience is good. A scheme can support that, but it can't replace it.
Rewards that fit the proposition. Ask what your customers value, and reward that. A discount trains customers to wait for it and cuts the contribution on every sale. Access, early information or recognition costs less. Compare each perk's cost with what it does to churn, which the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator lets you test.
Costs. A scheme costs the reward, the system, staff time and discounts given to people who would have bought anyway. Write down the cost and the effect you expect on CLV before you start.
UK example: Tesco Clubcard. Tesco launched Clubcard in the UK in February 1995 and has worked with the data analysis firm dunnhumby on it; accounts differ on who designed what, so check Tesco's and dunnhumby's own pages before quoting detail. The idea that made it influential was that a card links purchases to an individual customer, so a retailer can see what that customer buys over time instead of only what the till sold in total.
Ethics of loyalty pricing and data. Loyalty cards trade data for value, and the trade has to be fair. In its review of loyalty pricing in the groceries sector, published on 27 November 2024, the Competition and Markets Authority looked at about 50,000 products at Tesco, Sainsbury's, Waitrose, Co-op and Morrisons. It found 92% offered a genuine saving against the usual price, with average savings of 17% to 25% for members, and very little evidence that usual prices were inflated. Loyalty prices were not always the cheapest around, and some supermarkets could do more to help people without smartphones join. In its consumer survey, 43% thought it unfair that members pay lower prices for some products. It said it saw no evidence of consumer law concerns in how supermarkets collect and use data. Savings should be real, access fair and data use honest.
AI activity. Take 20 to 30 anonymised customer comments about your organisation: reviews, survey answers or service notes, with no names or contact details. Give them to an AI assistant and ask it to group them into themes and name each theme. Then check a sample of ten by hand against the themes. Record where the AI misread a comment, merged two different problems or missed sarcasm. Keep the themes you can defend.
Larkfield Works Out What a Subscriber Is Worth
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, wants to know what a subscriber is worth, so she can judge how much to spend on keeping them. She starts from what she already has.
Step 1: the contribution. From the routes to market topic, a subscriber's contribution is £8.00 a month. A subscriber pays £17.00 a month, but Maya uses contribution because revenue ignores the coffee, packaging, postage and fees.
Step 2: churn today. From the KPIs topic, monthly churn is 5%. With 1,800 subscribers, that is about 90 people leaving each month.
Step 3: expected lifetime. 1 ÷ 0.05 = 20 months.
Step 4: lifetime value. £8.00 × 20 = £160 per subscriber.
Step 5: the target. In the customer research topic, 39 of the 96 former subscribers said they cancelled because coffee was building up at home. The insight was that a fixed schedule doesn't match how much people drink, so Larkfield could let subscribers skip, pause or change frequency in one click. Maya asks what happens if those fixes lower churn to 4%.
Step 6: lifetime at 4%. 1 ÷ 0.04 = 25 months. £8.00 × 25 = £200.
Step 7: the difference. £200 − £160 = £40 more per subscriber. Across 1,800 subscribers, 1,800 × £40 = £72,000 more lifetime contribution.
| Churn 5% | Churn 4% | |
|---|---|---|
| Expected lifetime | 20 months | 25 months |
| Contribution per month | £8.00 | £8.00 |
| Lifetime value | £160 | £200 |
| Difference per subscriber | £40 | |
| Across 1,800 subscribers | £72,000 |
What she does. Maya makes the experience fixes first. Skip, pause or change frequency in one click is what customers said they needed. She also plans Brew Club perks that fit the brand: early access to seasonal coffees and the monthly tastings. These are not discounts, so they don't cut the £8.00 contribution on every order. She weighs each perk's cost against the £40.
Her assumptions, written down. Churn stays steady at the new rate. Contribution stays at £8.00. Every subscriber is treated as alike. The 4% is a target, not a result. The £72,000 is lifetime contribution across the current base, earned over time, not cash next month. Maya records the figures in the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator and these assumptions in her portfolio.
Knowledge Check
A gym member pays £40 a month and the gym's cost of serving them is £25. Which figure should the gym use in a lifetime value sum, and why?
The £15 contribution, because revenue ignores the costs of serving the member and only contribution is left to pay for marketing.A subscription business has 3% monthly churn and £10 contribution per customer per month. What is the expected lifetime and the lifetime value?
1 ÷ 0.03 is about 33 months, so the lifetime value is about £333 (£10 × 33.3), a simplified average that assumes churn stays steady.A café chain has 1,000 loyalty members. A change cuts monthly churn so that expected lifetime rises from 10 to 12.5 months, and contribution is £6 a month. What is the gain across the base?
Lifetime value rises from £60 to £75, which is £15 per member, so £15,000 across 1,000 members.A shop's loyalty scheme gives 10% off every purchase, but customers still leave when a rival is cheaper. Is that real loyalty, and what could the shop try?
It is a scheme without real loyalty, because the discount buys the sale but not the preference; the shop could try rewards that fit its proposition, such as early access or recognition, and fix the experience pain points.An AI assistant groups 30 customer comments into five themes. What should you do before relying on them?
Check a sample, such as ten comments, by hand against the themes and record where the AI misread, merged or missed things; only then use the themes.A supermarket's loyalty price is lower than its usual price. What does the CMA's 2024 review suggest you still check before calling it a good deal?
Whether the saving is genuine and whether another shop is cheaper, because the CMA found most loyalty prices gave real savings but they were not always the cheapest available.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: Pret A Manger, Club Pret page, checked in November 2026, for the current terms; search for "Club Pret". For the history, see ITV News, 4 September 2020, on the launch, and Restaurant Online, 11 February 2025, "Pret freezes its coffee subscription at £5 a month".
- Loyalty pricing: Competition and Markets Authority, "Review of loyalty pricing in the groceries sector", published 27 November 2024 on GOV.UK; search for the title.
- Tesco Clubcard: Tesco's and dunnhumby's own pages on the history of Clubcard; check dates and who did what before quoting them.
- Your data and the law: ICO, Guide to data protection and Guide to PECR, on lawful use of customer data and marketing messages. This isn't legal advice.
- Contribution margin: revisit the routes to market topic if the difference between revenue and contribution is still hazy.
- Further practice: complete the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator for your organisation, and keep your retention figures in your portfolio document; they feed the work on return on investment and the business case later in the course.
Your Retention Plan
- My customer lifetime value, with the assumptions behind it, and what a one-point fall in churn is worth across my organisation's customers.
- The experience fix I would make first, and the pain point it addresses.
- One customer I will listen to this month, and what I want to learn from them.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- Choose what to do next: model a second retention idea in the Customer Lifetime Value and Retention Calculator, or move on to the next topic.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Think of a bucket with holes. Winning new customers is pouring in more water. Churn is the holes. If water leaks out as fast as it goes in, the level never rises, however fast you pour.
Customer lifetime value just asks how long water stays in the bucket. If 5 in every 100 customers leave each month, an average customer stays about 20 months. If you plug some holes so only 4 leave, they stay about 25. Each month they stay earns the same contribution, so a few extra months add up across everyone.
The two traps are using revenue instead of contribution, and treating the answer as exact. It's a rough average built on assumptions. If the formula still feels slippery, do one customer by hand: what they pay each month, what it costs to serve them, how many months they typically stay.
Key terms in this module
- CRM
- Customer relationship management: the strategy, processes and systems an organisation uses to manage its relationships with customers.
- Customer experience (CX)
- The sum of a customer's interactions with an organisation and how they feel about them.
- Customer lifetime value (CLV)
- The contribution an organisation expects from a customer over the whole relationship.
- Retention rate
- The share of customers who stay over a period; the opposite of churn.
- Loyalty scheme
- A programme that rewards customers for repeat purchases or engagement.
- Pain point
- A moment in the customer's experience that causes frustration, effort or doubt.
Thanks. Good to hear.
International and Cross-Cultural Marketing
Why it matters. A website can sell to another country tomorrow. Whether anyone there wants to buy, and whether you're allowed to sell it the way you do at home, is a different question. Online selling makes it easy to reach a second market and easy to get it wrong, because the assumptions that worked at home quietly stop working, even when the language is the same. This topic takes everything you have built so far (customers, segments, proposition, the rules, routes to market and retention) across a border. You'll compare possible markets on evidence, choose one, adapt your offer and message to it, and check the legal and money questions. It closes the Commercial stage with Milestone 3: an ecommerce plan for a second market.
Progress marker: I can choose a second market and plan an ecommerce launch adapted to its culture and rules. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Second-Market Ecommerce Plan, and Lesson 13.5 needs the market choice, the rules and the localised offer from the lessons before it. If you have been asked to look at a new country this week, read the worked example, then start at Lesson 13.1. If you already know the market and are worried about the rules, start at Lesson 13.3. If your organisation is local, say a service for one town, your second market can be a second region or a community with a different culture in your own country; every task works the same way.
Second-Market Ecommerce Plan
Milestone 3: the markets you compared and the one you chose, entry mode, cultural and legal adaptations, localised proposition and prices, route to market, launch plan and KPIs, as one printable plan.
13.1Why and Where
Organisations go abroad for reasons, and some are better than others. Growth at home has slowed. Customers abroad have found you. A product that suits a niche has too few buyers in one country. Or a rival is moving first. Write your reason down, because it decides how much risk is sensible. "We could" is not a reason.
Choosing between markets. Compare at least three candidates on the same criteria, and write the evidence beside each, not just a score.
| Criterion | The question to ask |
|---|---|
| Demand evidence | Do people there already buy this kind of product, and is there any sign of interest in yours? |
| Competition | Who sells to them now, and what do they offer? |
| Cultural distance | How differently might customers think, shop and trust? |
| Law | Which consumer, data and tax rules apply, and what must change? |
| Logistics | How long and costly is delivery, and what happens on returns? |
Psychic distance. Psychic distance is how different a foreign market feels in language, culture, business practice and law. It is not the same as miles. A market a short flight away with a different legal system can be further, in the way that matters, than one with a long flight and familiar habits. It is also dangerous in the other direction: when a market feels close, we skip the checks.
UK example: Tesco's Fresh & Easy. Tesco is one of the UK's largest and most experienced grocers. In 2007 it opened its first Fresh & Easy stores in the United States. In April 2013 it announced that it would leave the US and sell the business. The trade press reported a charge of about £1.2bn for the exit, much of it writing down the value of the US stores and leases; reports before the announcement had put the bill at about £1bn. Reasons were debated at the time. You don't need to settle them to use the case: a large, experienced retailer found that skill at home did not guarantee results in a market that looked familiar enough to enter. Read what Tesco itself said, and reputable press from the period, before you draw your own conclusion. Check the dates and wording at the source.
Your organisation's candidates. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it compares three markets for Larkfield Coffee Roasters. Then pick three for your organisation. Include one that feels close and one that feels far, and ask whether the one that feels close has earned its place or has just not been questioned.
13.2Culture and Communication
Once you have a market, you need to know how its customers might think differently. Cultural frameworks give you questions to ask. They don't give you answers.
Hofstede's dimensions. Geert Hofstede compared national cultures on a handful of measures, set out in Hofstede, Hofstede and Minkov, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd edition, 2010). The dimensions include power distance (how far people accept unequal power), individualism and collectivism, uncertainty avoidance (how uncomfortable people are with the unknown) and long-term orientation. Each country gets a score. These are cultural dimensions.
Hall's high and low context. The anthropologist Edward T. Hall described, in Beyond Culture (1976), a difference in how much meaning sits in the words and how much in the setting. In a low-context style, the message is in what is said, plainly. In a high-context style, much is understood from tone, relationship and what is left unsaid. A direct "buy now" suits one; it may feel pushy in another.
Handle with care. Both frameworks describe national averages, not individuals. The person you are writing to may be nothing like the average, and your target segment, such as Home Brew Enthusiasts, may share more with enthusiasts in another country than with its own neighbours. Critics also point out that Hofstede's original data came from employees of one company, that countries aren't uniform, and that culture changes. Use the dimensions to generate hypotheses to test, never to label a nation.
What to adapt. Culture shows up in practical things:
- language, spelling, and humour that doesn't travel
- imagery and colour, and who appears in photos
- trust signals: which reviews, badges and guarantees people there recognise
- payment habits: the payment methods customers expect to see at checkout
- delivery and returns expectations
- when and why people buy, such as the gifting seasons
Segments travel differently. You chose a target in Module 3. Ask whether it exists in the new market, how big it is, and whether its path to purchase looks the same. A segment can be common at home and thin abroad, or the other way round.
Same language is not the same culture. Think of how differently "quite good" is heard in different English-speaking places. A phrase that sounds warm in one can sound lukewarm in another. A shared language removes one barrier and hides the rest.
13.3Entry Modes and the Rules
A market entry mode is the way an organisation enters a new country. For an online seller the main choices are these.
| Mode | What it is | Trade-off |
|---|---|---|
| Sell online from home | Your own shop ships across the border | Most control; you carry delivery, customs and service |
| Online marketplace | You list on a platform that serves the country | Shoppers already there; fees and platform rules |
| Distributor or retailer | A local business buys or lists your product | They hold the customer and take a margin |
| Partner, licence or joint venture | Someone local makes or sells under agreement | Shared control; slow to set up and hard to reverse |
| Own local operation | A local company, stock or staff | Highest control, cost and commitment |
These are the routes from Module 11 with a border added.
The rules after Brexit. This is a list of what to check, not legal advice.
- Customs: goods sent from Great Britain to Ireland are exports and imports, with paperwork. What is needed, who files it and whether duty applies depend on the goods, their value and where they were made. The EU's duty rules for low-value parcels changed on 1 July 2026, so don't rely on older guides. Check GOV.UK's guidance on exporting goods and the Irish Revenue Commissioners' customs pages.
- VAT: goods sold to consumers there fall under the destination's VAT rules. The EU's Import One-Stop Shop scheme, explained on Irish Revenue's website, covers low-value consignments up to a stated limit. Check the current limit and the VAT rate on your product; don't assume the UK's.
- Consumer law: EU customers generally have a 14-day right to cancel distance purchases under the Consumer Rights Directive, with exceptions that vary by product.
- Data protection: EU GDPR applies when you sell to people in Ireland, even from the UK. Your privacy notice, email consent and cookie banner must meet it, and you may need an EU representative. The regulator is the Data Protection Commission. You met the UK version in Module 5.
- Currency: you earn in one currency and spend in another, and rates move. Label any rate you use as an assumption.
Contribution per unit falls. Repeat the contribution sum from the routes topic for the new market and expect a lower answer: postage is higher, customs may add handling, and payment methods can cost more. If it falls far, your price, costs or plan must change.
Northern Ireland. This topic means the Republic of Ireland. Northern Ireland has its own arrangements and isn't covered here.
13.4Localising the Offer and the Message
Localisation means adapting content, language, prices, payment and service so they feel native to a market, not just translated. Translation changes the words. Localisation changes the offer.
Standardisation and adaptation. You will keep some things the same everywhere, such as your brand name and quality, and adapt others. The question for each element is whether it works unchanged. If not, is the gain from changing it worth the cost? Keep what makes you recognisable. Change what gets in the customer's way.
What to localise.
- Proposition: You wrote it in Module 4. Does every promise in it still hold in the new market? A delivery promise made for home may not survive a border.
- Prices: Set a local price in the local currency, check it against local competitors, and work out what it earns after local costs. Show the price including anything the customer must pay, so there are no surprises at checkout.
- Delivery and returns: Say what arrives when, who carries it, and what a return costs and how it works.
- Proof local customers trust: Reviews from customers in that market, recognisable payment options and a clear way to reach a person. Never write or buy reviews; the fake reviews rules you met in Module 11 apply at home, and EU consumer law bans them too.
AI activity. Choose three pieces of your marketing copy: a headline, a product description and a delivery message. Ask an AI assistant to translate or adapt them for your chosen market. Do not include personal or confidential data. Then have a native speaker, or a reliable local source such as a local retailer's website or a customer from that market, check the results. Record what the AI missed: wrong register, a phrase nobody uses, a promise that isn't true there. Keep the original, the AI version and your notes in your portfolio. They show your judgement.
13.5Milestone 3: The Second-Market Plan
Milestone 3 closes the Commercial stage. A second-market ecommerce plan is one document setting out which market you chose and why, how you'll enter, what the offer and rules are, and how you'll launch and measure it. It pulls together your work from the routes, loyalty and international topics. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it shows Maya's plan for Larkfield.
The sections, each drawn from earlier work:
| Section | From |
|---|---|
| Markets compared and chosen | This topic, Why and Where |
| Culture | This topic, Culture and Communication |
| Entry mode and rules | This topic, Entry Modes and the Rules |
| Localised offer | This topic, Localising the Offer and the Message, and your proposition from Module 4 |
| Route and contribution per unit | Your route comparison, Module 11 |
| Retention and lifetime value | Your retention plan, Module 12 |
| Launch communications and KPIs | Your KPIs and baselines, Module 6 |
Make the sections agree. The market you chose should be the market your culture, rules and prices describe. The route should match the entry mode. The contribution per unit should use the local price and the local costs, not the home ones. Check each join before you call the plan finished.
Name what you'd test before launching. You will not have proof. Say what you would learn first, cheaply: a small test, a conversation with someone from the market, a trial order to see the real delivery time and cost. Say what result would make you stop.
Leadership: who will do what. A launch asks people to do new work. Name an owner for each task: the plan, the storefront, the customer service, the checks on the rules. Be clear about who decides whether to go ahead. Ask each person whether they can repeat their part in a sentence.
Looking ahead. The plan feeds the business case you will make later in the course, so write the numbers as clearly as you can and label every assumption.
Larkfield Goes to Ireland
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, wants a second market. Leo Grant would run the storefront; Sarah Ahmed, the managing director, decides.
Why and where, from Lesson 13.1. Home Brew Enthusiasts may exist beyond the UK. Maya compares three markets.
| Criterion | Republic of Ireland | Netherlands | Germany |
|---|---|---|---|
| Demand evidence | None yet; check shop visits and orders | Same | Same |
| Competition | Check who sells subscription coffee there | Same | Same |
| Culture | Shared language; its own identity | A different main language | A different main language |
| Law | EU rules | EU rules | EU rules |
| Logistics | Short delivery distance | Longer | Longer |
Maya chooses the Republic of Ireland for shared language and short delivery. It still isn't "like the UK": customs declarations since 2021, euro pricing, EU consumer and data law, and its own identity.
Culture, rules and offer, from the lessons on culture, rules and localising. Maya lists wording and imagery to test with Irish readers. The mode is her own online shop with a euro storefront, with no Irish retailers in year one. Customs, VAT, consumer law and GDPR are each marked "to check" against an official page. She sets prices herself, stating no exchange rate.
| Per bag | UK | Ireland |
|---|---|---|
| One-off | £9.50 | €11.50 |
| Subscription | £8.50 | €10.50 |
The plan, from Lesson 13.5. Contribution per Irish subscription bag is £3.10, an assumption after higher postage and customs handling, so £6.20 a month per subscriber against £8.00 in the UK. Retention works as at home: one-click skip, pause or change frequency. Before launch she sends one trial parcel to check delivery time and cost.
Why the number falls. If Irish churn matched the home 5% (an assumption), a subscriber stays about 20 months: £6.20 × 20 = £124, against £160 at home. Whether £124 is enough to cover the cost of winning Irish subscribers is a question for the business case later in the course.
Who does what. Maya owns the plan, Leo the storefront, Sarah the go-ahead. Maya would stop if the trial parcel showed costs well above the £3.10 assumption.
In the Second-Market Ecommerce Plan, work down the sections in order.
Knowledge Check
A shop owner says they will sell to a country that "feels just like home" and skips research. Which idea explains the risk?
Psychic distance: a market can feel close and still differ in culture, law and habits, and feeling close makes people skip the checks.A report says a country scores high on uncertainty avoidance, so you write all copy to reassure. Why is that too confident?
Hofstede's scores are national averages with known critiques, not descriptions of every customer, so treat them as a hypothesis to test with people from the market.Your UK subscription bag earns £4.00. Selling the same bag abroad costs £0.90 more in postage and customs handling. What does it earn, and what does a two-bag subscriber earn a month?
£3.10 per bag, so £6.20 a month; extra delivery and customs costs lower the contribution unless the price rises.An AI assistant translates your delivery message into another language. What do you do before using it?
Have a native speaker or reliable local source check it, and record what the AI missed, such as register, phrasing or a promise that isn't true there.You sell from a UK website to customers in Ireland. Name two sets of rules that now apply that did not apply to purely UK sales.
Customs and VAT rules for sending goods to the EU, and EU consumer and data protection law, including EU GDPR; check each at the official source.At the end of this topic, what would you test before launch, and what result would make you stop?
A cheap first test such as a trial parcel and local readers of the page, with a stated limit, such as costs far above the assumed contribution, that would stop the launch.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: Tesco's own statement of 17 April 2013 on its exit from the US, and reputable press from the period, such as The Grocer's "Tesco profits fall on back of £1.2bn charge to exit US" (April 2013). Check the dates and the figures as Tesco and the press state them.
- Hofstede: Geert Hofstede, Gert Jan Hofstede and Michael Minkov, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd edition (McGraw-Hill, 2010). Read it with at least one published critique of Hofstede's method alongside.
- Hall: Edward T. Hall, Beyond Culture (Anchor Press, 1976), on high- and low-context communication.
- Customs and VAT: GOV.UK's guidance on exporting goods from the UK and on selling to the EU, and the Irish Revenue Commissioners' customs and VAT pages, including the Import One-Stop Shop page at revenue.ie/en/vat/vat-ecommerce/import-oss/index.aspx. Date what you read, because limits and procedures change. This isn't legal advice.
- Data protection: Ireland's Data Protection Commission, which publishes guidance on GDPR for businesses, and the Information Commissioner's Office for the UK side.
- Consumer rights: the European Commission's pages on consumer rights when buying online, which explain the 14-day right to cancel under the Consumer Rights Directive, with its exceptions.
- Further practice: ask one person from your chosen market to read your localised page and tell you what feels odd. Then print the Second-Market Ecommerce Plan as Milestone 3.
Your Plan, Your Blind Spot and What You'd Test
- What I made: three markets compared and one chosen, five cultural adaptations, an entry mode with the rules checked, a localised offer and a launch plan, all saved in the Second-Market Ecommerce Plan.
- My cultural blind spot: the assumption I made about the market that I'm least able to check myself, and who could check it.
- What I'd test before launching, and the result that would make me stop.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio. Then look back over the whole Commercial stage: which marker moved most, and which still sits at "not yet"?
- Choose what to do next: talk to one person from your chosen market and revise your plan, or start the Leader stage, where you judge what marketing achieved and make the case for what comes next.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
Same language isn't the same culture. Think of a sentence you say at home, such as "that's not bad". Among friends it means "good". To someone else it might mean "disappointing". Nobody is wrong. They are using the same words in different settings.
Selling abroad is like moving house to a street you can see from yours. The shops look familiar, so you stop checking. You still need to ask what people buy there, how they pay, what the rules are and who you are competing against.
If the whole topic feels like too much, take one market and write five lines: why you chose it, one thing that may be different in how people buy, one rule to check, the price in the local currency and what you would test first. Ask one person from that market to read it and tell you what you've missed.
The usual misconception is that culture frameworks give you answers. They give you questions. The answer comes from people in the market.
Key terms in this module
- Market entry mode
- The way an organisation enters a new country, such as exporting online, using a distributor, licensing, a joint venture or setting up its own operation.
- Standardisation and adaptation
- The choice between keeping the marketing the same in every country and changing it to suit each one.
- Localisation
- Adapting content, language, prices, payment and service so that they feel native to a market, not just translated.
- Psychic distance
- How different a foreign market feels in language, culture, business practice and law, which can matter more than geographic distance.
- Cultural dimensions
- Frameworks, such as Hofstede's, that compare national cultures on a few measures; useful prompts, but they describe averages, not individuals.
- Cross-border ecommerce
- Selling online to customers in another country.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Performance, Attribution and ROI
Why it matters. Every channel's dashboard will tell you it worked. A leader's job is to find out what really happened, and say so, even when the answer is "less than we hoped". This is the first topic of the Leader stage. Earlier you set baselines in Module 6, planned a campaign with a budget, and worked out what a customer is worth in Module 12. Now you bring those together and ask the question a finance director asks: what did we get for the money? You'll review results against objectives, see what attribution can and can't tell you, estimate what would have happened anyway, and calculate return on investment with a check on how fragile it is.
Progress marker: I can judge what marketing really achieved and calculate its ROI honestly. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order. Each ends in a task for your portfolio, and the last uses the Campaign ROI and Incrementality Calculator. If someone has just asked you "was it worth it?", read the worked example first, then go to Lesson 14.4. Larkfield Coffee Roasters, the course's coffee roaster, is fictional and its figures are illustrative. If your organisation hasn't run a campaign yet, use projected results and label them as projections, or use the Larkfield figures. Your answers feed the performance review in your final milestone.
Campaign ROI and Incrementality Calculator
Enter results, the baseline, spend and customer lifetime value, and see incremental results, cost per incremental customer, the value created and the ROI, with a sensitivity check on your assumptions.
14.1Reviewing Performance
A performance review compares what happened with what you meant to happen, and with what you would have expected anyway. It has three parts.
Results against objectives. Take each objective from your plan and put the result beside it. Use the same measure and the same dates. A target of "net new customers" is not met by a result of "gross new customers". A simple table does the job:
| Measure | Target | Result | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| (the measure from your plan) |
Results against baselines. You set baselines in the KPIs topic: where the numbers stood before you started. A result only means something beside its baseline. Sales of 500 are good news if the baseline was 300 and bad news if it was 700.
What changed besides the marketing. Season, a price change, a competitor's offer, a stock shortage, even the weather can move results. List them. You can't always remove their effect, but you can say they were there. A review that credits marketing for everything is as unreliable as one that blames it for everything.
Say what missed, and why. If you missed a target, say so in the first line, with the size of the miss. Then give the reasons you can support with evidence, and the ones you only suspect, labelled as suspicions. People trust a review that opens with the bad news far more than one that buries it.
Keep the sums checkable. Every figure should be traceable to a source, and every total should add up. Check your own arithmetic before anyone else does.
14.2Attribution
Attribution means giving credit for a sale or sign-up to the marketing touchpoints that came before it. Most people meet more than one before they act: a social ad, then a search, then an email. Attribution is the rule for sharing out the credit.
The common models.
- Last click gives all the credit to the final touchpoint before the conversion.
- First click gives it all to the first.
- Position-based gives most to the first and last and a little to those between.
- Data-driven uses a platform's statistical model of customer paths to share out the credit. It is only as good as the data it can see.
The choice of model changes the answer. Google removed first click, linear, time decay and position-based attribution from Google Analytics 4 and Google Ads in 2023, leaving last click and data-driven. Check the current help pages.
Why every platform over-claims. Each platform counts the conversions it can see and takes credit for those it touched. Add up the claims and the total is often more than the sales you made. Nobody is lying. Each is measuring its own view of the path.
What it cannot show. Attribution follows people who clicked. It can't tell you:
- who would have bought anyway, which the next lesson tackles
- the effect of things people saw but did not click, such as a poster, a video or a friend's recommendation
- offline influence, such as a conversation in a shop
- how changing ways of finding answers affect clicks. When search tools answer questions directly, fewer people may click through, and the data can understate what that activity did
UK example: published effectiveness research. In April 2024 Thinkbox, the UK television industry's marketing body, published Profit Ability 2. Five agencies combined their econometric databases of client data, covering 141 brands, to measure profit payback over several time periods. Read the source for its findings, and note that it relies on modelling, not experiments, and an industry body commissioned it. Les Binet and Peter Field's The Long and the Short of It (IPA, 2013) reports that, on average across the cases studied, a mix of roughly 60% brand-building and 40% activation performed well. That ratio is an average from their data and varies by category, so treat it as a starting point for discussion, not a rule. Both matter here because effects that take time to build don't show up in a last-click report.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to explain why last-click and incremental results can differ for your campaign. Compare its answer with this lesson and your data, and note anything it states as fact that you cannot check.
14.3Incrementality
Incrementality is the part of a result that would not have happened without the marketing. The rest would have happened anyway. Attribution tells you who was touched. Incrementality asks whether the touch made a difference. If you take one question from this topic, take that one: would it have happened anyway?
The calculation is simple. Incremental results = results with the marketing − what you expected without it. The hard part is the second number.
Three ways to find it.
- A holdout group. Choose a group at random and deliberately don't show them the marketing. Compare their results with the group that saw it. This is the strongest method, because the two groups differ only in the marketing. The cost is that you forgo some sales from the held-out group, which you can often afford if the group is small.
- A geographic or matched comparison. Run the marketing in some areas or shops and not in similar ones. It works when you cannot hold out individuals, but areas never match perfectly.
- Before and after against a baseline. Compare the campaign period with your baseline from the KPIs topic. It needs no special set-up, so most organisations start here. Its weakness is that it assumes nothing else changed. If the season, price or a competitor shifted, the baseline no longer shows what would have happened.
State the weakness whichever you use. A figure that comes with its limitation is more useful than one that pretends to certainty.
Marketing mix modelling (MMM) is a statistical method that uses months or years of sales and spend data to estimate how much each activity, and factors such as price and season, contributed to sales. It suits organisations with several channels and a good run of data, and it does not rely on tracking individual people. It needs a lot of clean data and skilled interpretation. Open-source tools exist, such as Meta's Robyn and Google's Meridian, but both come from advertising platforms, so ask who built a model and what they gain from the answer. For a small organisation, a simple holdout or comparison is often the practical choice.
Designing a test. Write down before you start:
- the question: what are you trying to learn?
- the groups: who sees the marketing, who does not, and how you chose them
- the measure and the period
- what result would change your decision
- how you will tell if something else interfered
14.4ROI Honestly
Marketing ROI is the return on marketing investment. This course measures it on contribution, not revenue, because revenue ignores the cost of delivering what you sold. Some organisations use revenue. When someone quotes an ROI, ask which they mean.
The steps.
- Incremental customers = customers gained − customers expected anyway.
- Value created = incremental customers × lifetime value per customer.
- ROI = (value created − cost) ÷ cost.
- Cost per incremental customer = cost ÷ incremental customers.
Pull back what you know. Before reading on, try to recall how lifetime value is worked out. It is contribution per month multiplied by expected lifetime, and expected lifetime is 1 ÷ monthly churn. You met it in Module 12. Lifetime value is a forecast. It is earned over time, not paid into the bank this quarter. So an ROI built on it is an expected return, not cash already received.
Compare with a target. The cost per incremental customer is the figure to hold against the target you set when you planned the budget. It is also worth comparing with lifetime value: the gap between the two is what each new customer is expected to earn after paying for their own acquisition.
Test the assumptions. An ROI depends on inputs you estimated. Change the important ones and see what happens. Lifetime value is usually the largest. Run the sum at the figure you expect and at a more cautious and a more optimistic one. If the ROI stays positive across them, you can say so with confidence. If it turns negative at a plausible lower value, say that, too.
Read the worked example first. It models every step for Larkfield. Then use the Campaign ROI and Incrementality Calculator with your own figures.
AI activity. Give an AI assistant your spend, results, expected results and lifetime value, and ask it to check your ROI arithmetic and explain any difference between last-click and incremental results. Then redo every step yourself. Note any step it got wrong or any number it introduced that you did not give it.
Larkfield Reviews "Roasted This Week"
Larkfield Coffee Roasters is fictional, and all its figures are illustrative. Maya Collins, the marketing manager, reviews the autumn campaign (1 September to 30 November 2026). She states the miss first.
Step 1: against the objective. Spend was £30,000, on budget. The aim was to grow active subscribers from 1,800 to 2,100, a net gain of 300. There were 510 new subscribers. Cancellations were 90, 85 and 78 across the three months: 253 in all. Subscribers at 30 November: 1,800 + 510 − 253 = 2,057. The net gain was 257 against 300, so Larkfield missed by 43. Maya says so first. Churn was about 4% by November, after the one-click pause.
Step 2: what would have happened anyway. Larkfield was winning about 90 new subscribers a month, so 270 over three months. The campaign added 510 − 270 = 240 incremental subscribers. That assumes the baseline of 90 a month would have held, and Maya records the assumption as a limitation.
Step 3: what last click says. It credits paid search with 190 of the 510, email 110, paid social 95, and direct and organic 115 (the total is 510). Paid social looks weakest, but last click sees only the final step, so social ads may have started journeys that ended in a search. It also credits the 270 who would have joined anyway.
Step 4: cost per incremental subscriber. £30,000 ÷ 240 = £125, against the £100 target.
Step 5: ROI. Lifetime value at 5% churn was £160 in the CRM topic. Value created: 240 × £160 = £38,400. ROI: (£38,400 − £30,000) ÷ £30,000 = 28%. At £200, the value at 4% churn: £48,000 and an ROI of 60%.
| Lifetime value £160 | Lifetime value £200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Value created | £38,400 | £48,000 |
| Spend | £30,000 | £30,000 |
| ROI | 28% | 60% |
Her conclusion. The campaign missed its target by 43 and cost £25 more per extra subscriber than planned, yet it still earned more than it cost at either value, if the baseline holds. The target was net growth after cancellations. The ROI counts only the 240 added, over their lifetime. Each cost £125 and is expected to earn £160, an expected return earned over time. Maya records the figures in the Campaign ROI and Incrementality Calculator and plans a holdout group for the next campaign.
Knowledge Check
Three platforms report 400, 350 and 250 conversions between them, but the shop took 600 orders. What most likely explains the gap?
Each platform claims credit for conversions it touched, so the same order is counted by more than one: they total 1,000 against 600 real orders.A campaign costing £9,000 brings 400 new customers when 250 were expected anyway. How many are incremental, and what is the cost per incremental customer?
400 − 250 = 150 incremental customers, and £9,000 ÷ 150 = £60 each.Each of those customers has a lifetime value of £80. What is the ROI?
Value created is 150 × £80 = £12,000, so ROI is (£12,000 − £9,000) ÷ £9,000, which is 33.3%.If the lifetime value in question 3 turns out to be £50, what happens to the ROI?
Value created falls to £7,500 and ROI to (£7,500 − £9,000) ÷ £9,000, about −16.7%: the campaign loses money, so the result is sensitive to the assumption.A shop compares sales this December with last month's to judge a new ad. What is the weakness, and what would be stronger?
The comparison ignores the Christmas rise that would have happened anyway; a holdout group or a matched comparison separates the ad's effect from the season.Larkfield missed its subscriber target by 43 but shows a positive ROI. How can both be true?
The target was net growth after cancellations, while the ROI values only the 240 incremental subscribers against the £30,000 spend; the two measure different things.
Resources & Further Practice
- The UK example at source: Thinkbox, Profit Ability 2, published April 2024; search for the title on the Thinkbox website and read its method and limits before quoting any finding.
- Effectiveness over time: Les Binet and Peter Field, The Long and the Short of It (IPA, 2013). Treat the 60:40 split as an average from their data, and check later IPA updates before quoting figures.
- Attribution models: Google Ads Help, "First click, linear, time decay, and position-based attribution models are going away"; search for the title, and check the current Google Analytics help pages for the models offered today.
- Marketing mix modelling: search for Meta's Robyn and Google's Meridian, two open-source tools, and read who publishes each and how it describes itself.
- Baselines and lifetime value: revisit the KPIs topic for baselines and the CRM topic for lifetime value if either is hazy.
- Further practice: complete the Campaign ROI and Incrementality Calculator for your organisation and keep the results and assumptions in your portfolio. They feed Module 15 and your final milestone.
Your Performance Review
- My review: the results against objectives and baselines, with any miss stated first.
- What attribution hid in my organisation's results.
- What I would measure differently next time.
- Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- Choose what to do next: design the incrementality test properly, with groups, measure and decision rule, or move on to the next topic.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
One question sits behind everything here: would it have happened anyway?
Think of a shop that puts out a sandwich board and sees 50 people come in. Did the board bring them? Some would have come in regardless. If the street is always busy on Saturdays, perhaps most would. Counting the people who walked past the board is easy. The real question is how many walked in only because of it.
You answer by comparing. Look at a similar day without the board, or a similar shop without one. The gap is the board's effect. The arithmetic that follows is only multiplication and subtraction: extra customers, times what each is worth, minus what it cost. The skill is in being honest about the comparison and saying what could be wrong with it.
Key terms in this module
- Attribution
- Assigning credit for a sale or conversion to the marketing touchpoints that came before it.
- Last-click attribution
- Giving all the credit for a conversion to the final touchpoint before it.
- Incrementality
- The results that would not have happened without the marketing, found by comparing with what would have happened anyway.
- Holdout group
- A group deliberately not shown the marketing, so that its results show what would have happened anyway.
- Marketing ROI
- The return on marketing investment: the extra contribution the marketing generated, minus what it cost, divided by what it cost.
- Marketing mix modelling
- A statistical method that estimates how much each marketing activity, and other factors such as price and season, contributed to sales over time.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Business Cases, Risk and Leadership
Why it matters. Good ideas lose to well-argued ones. The business case is how marketing earns a seat at the table where the money is decided. Leaders don't only run campaigns. They win the budget and the people to run them, choose between options and own what could go wrong. This topic turns your portfolio into the document a leader takes into the room: a review of what happened, a case for what should happen next, the risks managed and the people led. It closes the Leader stage with Milestone 4: a performance review with ROI and a business case, and it draws on Modules 1–14.
Progress marker: I can make a decision-ready business case, manage its risks and lead the people who deliver it. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.
Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Performance Review and Business Case Builder, and Lesson 15.5 needs the review, options, cases, risks and leadership plan from the lessons before it. If a decision is due this week, read the worked example, then start at Lesson 15.2. If you have no budget to ask for, make the case for a change you would like your organisation, placement or club to make; every task works the same way. The demonstration organisation is Larkfield Coffee Roasters, with its agency Northlight Studio. Both are fictional, and all their figures are illustrative.
Performance Review and Business Case Builder
Milestone 4: your performance review with ROI, the options you considered, the business case using the Five Case Model, a risk register and your leadership plan, as one printable, decision-ready document.
15.1The Performance Review as Evidence
A decision-maker has little time and a fair suspicion of marketing reports. A performance review for a business case is a short, honest account in four parts: what we did, what happened, what we learned, and what it means for the next decision. Read the worked example later in this topic first.
Start from your own numbers. You built the pieces in Module 6 and Module 14. Pull them together: the objective and the baseline you were measured against, the result, the cost, the ROI, and the assumption it rests on. If part of the result would have happened anyway, say how you estimated that and that it is an estimate.
Be honest about misses. A missed target does not sink a case. A hidden one does, because the first awkward question will find it. Say what was missed, by how much, and what you think caused it. Then say whether the investment still earned its money. Both can be true.
End on meaning. Finish with one sentence beginning "So what this tells us is". That is the bridge to the options.
Keep it short. If the review runs past one page, the reader is being asked to do your analysis for you.
2. The cost, the ROI and the assumption behind it
3. What missed, by how much, and your best explanation
4. One sentence on what it means for the next decision
2. Does the review say plainly what did not work?
3. Could a reader act on the final sentence?
15.2Making the Case
A business case sets out why an investment is needed, the options, the costs, the benefits and risks, and a recommendation. It is an argument for a decision: what we should do, why, what it costs, what could go wrong and who will do it.
The Five Case Model. HM Treasury's framework splits the argument into five parts:
| Case | The question it answers |
|---|---|
| Strategic | Why do this, and does it fit what we are trying to achieve? |
| Economic | Which option gives the best value? |
| Commercial | Can we buy or arrange what we need, and on what terms? |
| Financial | Can we afford it, and what is the cash profile? |
| Management | Who delivers it, how, and how will we know it is working? |
UK example: the Treasury's guidance. HM Treasury publishes Guidance on Developing Business Cases for projects and programmes, based on the Five Case Model (first published 16 May 2024). It sits beside the Green Book, the Treasury's appraisal guidance, which has a 2026 edition after a 2025 review. Both are written for public spending, so borrow the structure, not the rules. Check gov.uk for the current versions and for how the guidance handles options.
Options appraisal. Compare realistic options, and always include doing the minimum. It is the baseline: every other option has to beat it. An option with no real alternative beside it is a decision already made.
Use your milestones. Your options should come from work you have already done. If you planned a second market in Module 13, that plan is a ready-made option, with its contribution per customer. The lifetime value from Module 12 turns customers into money, and the campaign you planned in Module 7 is what your review judges.
Judging the money. ROI is (benefit − cost) ÷ cost. Payback is how long until the money back covers the cost. Both need a stated benefit, and the benefit needs a stated assumption.
Sensitivity. Change the assumption you trust least and see what happens. Find the break-even point, the result where benefit equals cost, and ask how far the plan is from it.
2. ROI for the recommended option, and its break-even point
3. A sensitivity case in which the key assumption is worse
4. One short paragraph for each of the five cases
2. Do the sums check, and is every assumption labelled?
3. Does the sensitivity case show whether the recommendation survives?
15.3Managing Risk
A risk register is a list of what could go wrong, each with its likelihood, impact, owner and the action to reduce it. It is the part of a case that shows you have thought past the good news.
Look in five places. Commercial risks affect sales and money, such as slow uptake or a currency move. Operational risks affect delivery, such as capacity or delays. Legal risks come from rules, such as consumer and data law. Ethical risks are about doing the right thing, such as claims you can't support. Reputational risks are what the others cost you in trust. You met the rules side in Module 5, and an unsupported claim is both an ethical and a reputational risk.
Score and rank. Give each risk a likelihood and an impact from 1 to 5, and multiply. A risk scoring 4 for likelihood and 3 for impact scores 12. The scale is a convention, not a law of nature, and the scores are your judgement. Show your reasoning so someone can disagree with it.
Every risk needs an owner and an action. An owner is one named person. An action says what will be done and by when, or what would trigger it. "Monitor" is not an action.
Plan the trigger. For the biggest risks, decide in advance what you'll see that tells you to act or to stop.
Risks you choose to accept. Some risks aren't worth reducing. Write down which, and why.
2. A likelihood, impact and score for each
3. A named owner and a specific action for each
4. A trigger for the two highest-scoring risks
2. Does each action say what happens, not just that someone will watch?
3. Can you explain each score?
15.4Leading Marketing
The best case still fails if the people who must act on it aren't with you. Leading marketing means getting a decision made and then getting the work done, often by people you don't manage.
Know what each person needs. The finance adviser wants to see the sums and the downside. The managing director wants a clear choice and a recommendation. The delivery team wants to know what changes for them. An agency wants a clear brief, as you learned in Module 10. Write down, for each, what they need from you and what they might worry about.
Lead people you don't manage. You have no authority over an agency or another department. You have clarity, fairness and your word. Say what is needed and by when, give feedback quickly, and credit good work in public.
Communicate the decision, including a no. If your case is approved, say what happens next and who does what. If it is turned down, say what was decided, why, and what happens instead. Don't blame, and don't let the team find out sideways.
Look after the team. A launch adds work. Say what will stop to make room, and notice who is carrying too much.
AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to act as a sceptical finance director and challenge your case and risk register. Remove names and commercially sensitive figures first, or use public or invented ones. Decide which challenges are fair and answer them. Note any it raised that you had missed, and keep the challenges and your replies in your portfolio.
2. Who does what in delivery, including any agency, with one owner for each task
3. How you will tell people the decision, and a version if the answer is no
4. The AI challenges you accepted, rejected and had missed
2. Is there one owner for every task?
3. Are the AI challenges answered with evidence, not dismissed?
15.5Milestone 4: The Review and Business Case
Milestone 4 is the last piece of your portfolio and the one you may actually use. It is one document that a decision-maker could read in the room. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it shows Maya's case for Larkfield.
The sections, in the order a reader needs them:
| Section | From |
|---|---|
| Executive summary | Written last, one page |
| Performance review | Lesson 15.1 |
| Options and the five cases | Lesson 15.2 |
| Risk register | Lesson 15.3 |
| Leadership plan | Lesson 15.4 |
| Recommendation and next steps | This lesson |
The executive summary. Write it last and keep it to one page. Open with the decision you are asking for and the date. Then the evidence, the recommendation with its ROI and break-even point, the main risk and what you need from the reader. If the reader stops there, they should still decide well.
Check the joins. The review's results feed the options. The costs match across the options, the financial case and the ROI. Every risk in the register has an owner who appears in the leadership plan. The recommendation is the option the economic case favours, or you say why not.
Ask for something specific. End with the decision, the date and the first three actions after a yes.
2. A recommendation with a staged plan and a review point
3. A one-page executive summary that opens with the decision requested
4. Your final self-rating on every marker on the Progress Map
2. Could someone decide from the executive summary alone?
3. Does the recommendation say what would make you stop?
Larkfield Makes the Case for Ireland
Larkfield Coffee Roasters and Northlight Studio are fictional, and all figures are illustrative. Maya Collins (marketing manager) writes the case. Sarah Ahmed (managing director) decides with the finance adviser on 15 January 2027, for the year from 1 April 2027.
The review, from Lesson 15.1. The autumn campaign spent its £30,000 budget. Subscribers reached 2,057, net +257 against +300, so the target was missed by 43. Of 510 new subscribers, an estimated 240 were incremental, assuming the 90-a-month baseline would have held. At a lifetime value of £160, 240 × £160 = £38,400, and ROI is (£38,400 − £30,000) ÷ £30,000 = 28% (60% at £200). Cost per incremental subscriber was £125, against £100. Maya says both: missed, yet worth the money.
The options, from Lesson 15.2.
| Option | Cost | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| A: do the minimum, keep the UK plan | No new spend | The baseline |
| B: launch in the Republic of Ireland | £45,000 | 500 × £124 = £62,000 |
| C: same money, UK retention only | £45,000 | Not yet estimated |
B costs £25,000 marketing + £12,000 set-up, logistics and compliance + £8,000 contingency = £45,000. £124 is £6.20 a month, the contribution per Irish subscriber from Maya's plan in Module 13, × 20 months, the lifetime at 5% churn from Module 12. ROI is (£62,000 − £45,000) ÷ £45,000 = 37.8%. Break-even is £45,000 ÷ £124, about 363 subscribers. At 300, 300 × £124 = £37,200: £7,800 short. With no monthly forecast, Maya gives no payback date and says so. She can't size C yet.
The five cases. Strategic: growth has stalled. Economic: B beats A on the sums. Commercial: own shop, euro storefront, no Irish retailers in year one. Financial: £45,000 in the year from 1 April 2027. Management: below.
The risks. Each has a named owner. The scores are Maya's judgement and aren't shown here. Currency movement: Sarah, with the finance adviser. Customs and delivery delays: Leo, after a trial parcel. Slow uptake: Maya, at the month 6 review. EU consumer and data rules: Maya, each rule checked. Roastery capacity at Christmas: Sarah. An unqualified claim: Maya, with an Irish reviewer.
The recommendation. B, staged, with a month 6 review. Maya leads. Leo runs the Irish storefront and campaigns. Northlight adapts the creative with an Irish reviewer.
Knowledge Check
A colleague says Option B returns £62,000 on £45,000, so its ROI is 138%. What is wrong?
That divides the return by the cost; ROI takes the cost off first, so (£62,000 − £45,000) ÷ £45,000 = 37.8%.At £124 per Irish subscriber, how many are needed to cover £45,000, and why does that matter?
About 363 (£45,000 ÷ £124 = 362.9, so 363); it is the break-even point, and the 500 target sits above it while 300 falls below.Why include doing the minimum as an option?
It is the baseline every other option must beat; without it a reader cannot see whether the spending is worth it.A reader asks who will deliver the launch and how you will know it is working. Which of the five cases answers that?
The management case: owners, delivery steps and the review points that show whether it is on track.What makes "Reputational risk from an unqualified claim" a usable register entry rather than just a worry?
It has a named owner, a specific action and a trigger, and is scored for likelihood and impact so it can be ranked.An AI playing a sceptical finance director says your sales forecast is too optimistic. What do you do?
Test the forecast with a sensitivity case, answer with evidence where it is fair, and record the challenge and your reply rather than ignoring it.
Resources & Further Practice
- HM Treasury business case guidance: Guidance on Developing Business Cases on gov.uk, at gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-developing-business-cases. Check the current version and its date, and how it handles options.
- The Green Book: HM Treasury's appraisal guidance, at gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government. Check which edition is current. It is written for public spending, so borrow the thinking, not the rules.
- Regulators for your risk register: the Information Commissioner's Office for data and marketing messages, the Advertising Standards Authority for advertising claims, and the Competition and Markets Authority for consumer law. Read their own pages and date what you read. This isn't legal advice.
- Your own numbers: reopen your KPI baselines, attribution notes and ROI sum from the earlier topics, and check every figure in your review against its source.
- Further practice: ask one person who handles budgets, such as a finance colleague or tutor, to read your executive summary and tell you what they would challenge. Then print the Performance Review and Business Case Builder as Milestone 4.
Your Portfolio and Where You Started
- What I made: a performance review with ROI, three options, a business case, a risk register, a leadership plan and a one-page executive summary, all saved in the Performance Review and Business Case Builder.
- The strategic audit's three issues from Module 6, checked against what I know now: which still stand, which have changed, and which I would add.
- The Progress Map then and now: Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it), and on every other marker, and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
- The topic where I grew most, and the evidence that shows it.
- What I'll do next with this portfolio: an interview, a placement report, or a proposal at work.
Did this module make sense?
Thanks for saying so: the Faculty sees every “not really”.
Which part lost you? (optional, anonymous)
Thanks: that tells the Faculty exactly where to look.
In the meantime:
Another way in
A business case is an argument for a decision. Imagine asking a friend to lend you money for a van. They would ask what you will do with it, what it costs, how you will pay it back, what could go wrong and whether you can really do it. Those are the five cases, in plain words.
If it feels too big, write five lines: what you want to do, why, what it costs, what could go wrong and who will do it. Then add the cost of doing nothing.
The usual misconception is that a good case hides its weak points. The opposite is true. A case that names its risks and shows where it breaks is easier to trust, and easier to say yes to.
Key terms in this module
- Business case
- A document that sets out why an investment is needed, the options, the costs, benefits and risks, and a recommendation for a decision.
- Five Case Model
- HM Treasury's framework for business cases, covering the strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management cases.
- Options appraisal
- Comparing realistic options, including doing the minimum, before recommending one.
- Risk register
- A list of risks, each with its likelihood, impact, owner and the action to reduce it.
- Payback period
- How long it takes for the money an investment brings in to cover what it cost.
- Sensitivity analysis
- Testing how a result changes when a key assumption changes.
Thanks. Good to hear.
Review this course
Tell other learners what you thought. Your review is private: the Academy may choose to show it, with the name you give, only if you tick the box below.
Finished the course?
Generate a certificate of completion — free, no sign-up, made locally in your browser.
Suggested Timeline
Total workload is about 65–80 hours across 15 modules. Pick the pace that fits your week — both cover everything.
Standard Pace
| Week | Module | Est. hours |
|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Module 1: The Digital Marketplace and Business Intelligence | 4.5 |
| 2–3 | Module 2: Customers, Buyer Behaviour and Research | 4.5 |
| 3–4 | Module 3: Segmentation, Targeting and the Path to Purchase | 4.5 |
| 4–5 | Module 4: Proposition, the 7Ps, Brand and Portfolio | 4.5 |
| 5–6 | Module 5: Regulation, Data Protection and Ethics in Marketing | 4.5 |
| 6–7 | Module 6: KPIs, Analytics and Baselines | 5.5 |
| 8–9 | Module 7: Integrated Communications and Budgets | 4.5 |
| 9–10 | Module 8: Content, UX and User Journeys | 4.5 |
| 10–11 | Module 9: Search, Email and Social Communities | 4.5 |
| 11–12 | Module 10: Briefing Creative and Managing Agencies | 5.5 |
| 12–13 | Module 11: Ecommerce and Routes to Market | 4.5 |
| 13–14 | Module 12: CRM, Customer Experience and Loyalty | 4.5 |
| 15–16 | Module 13: International and Cross-Cultural Marketing | 5.5 |
| 16–17 | Module 14: Performance, Attribution and ROI | 4.5 |
| 17–19 | Module 15: Business Cases, Risk and Leadership | 6.5 |
Accelerated Pace
| Week | Module | Est. hours |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Module 1: The Digital Marketplace and Business Intelligence | 4.5 |
| 1–2 | Module 2: Customers, Buyer Behaviour and Research | 4.5 |
| 2 | Module 3: Segmentation, Targeting and the Path to Purchase | 4.5 |
| 2–3 | Module 4: Proposition, the 7Ps, Brand and Portfolio | 4.5 |
| 3 | Module 5: Regulation, Data Protection and Ethics in Marketing | 4.5 |
| 3–4 | Module 6: KPIs, Analytics and Baselines | 5.5 |
| 4–5 | Module 7: Integrated Communications and Budgets | 4.5 |
| 5 | Module 8: Content, UX and User Journeys | 4.5 |
| 5–6 | Module 9: Search, Email and Social Communities | 4.5 |
| 6 | Module 10: Briefing Creative and Managing Agencies | 5.5 |
| 6–7 | Module 11: Ecommerce and Routes to Market | 4.5 |
| 7 | Module 12: CRM, Customer Experience and Loyalty | 4.5 |
| 8 | Module 13: International and Cross-Cultural Marketing | 5.5 |
| 8–9 | Module 14: Performance, Attribution and ROI | 4.5 |
| 9–10 | Module 15: Business Cases, Risk and Leadership | 6.5 |
Glossary
Terms and acronyms used throughout the course, in one place.
- 7Ps
- The extended marketing mix: product, price, place, promotion, people, process and physical evidence.
- Accessibility
- Designing so that disabled people, and everyone else, can use a service; in the UK, usually judged against the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
- Amends
- Changes requested to creative work after it's presented; contracts usually limit how many rounds are included.
- ASA
- The Advertising Standards Authority, the UK's independent regulator of advertising across all media.
- Attribution
- Assigning credit for a sale or conversion to the marketing touchpoints that came before it.
- Average order value (AOV)
- Revenue divided by the number of orders.
- Baseline
- The value of a measure before you change anything, used as the starting point for targets and for judging results.
- Brand architecture
- How an organisation's brands and sub-brands relate to each other, for example one master brand across everything or separate brands for each product.
- Brand building
- Communications that build memory and preference over the long term among many potential buyers.
- Business case
- A document that sets out why an investment is needed, the options, the costs, benefits and risks, and a recommendation for a decision.
- Business intelligence
- Gathering, checking and organising information about the market, customers and competitors so that marketing decisions rest on evidence.
- Buyer behaviour
- How people and organisations recognise a need, search, compare, buy and judge what they bought.
- Campaign plan
- One document setting out a campaign's objective, audience, message, channels, budget, timeline and how it will be measured.
- CAP Code
- The UK Code of Non-broadcast Advertising and Direct & Promotional Marketing, written by the Committee of Advertising Practice and enforced by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA).
- Channel conflict
- Tension when an organisation's routes to market compete with each other, for example on price.
- Churn rate
- The share of customers or subscribers who leave in a period.
- Content design
- Starting from the user's need and writing content in the clearest form to meet it.
- Content strategy
- Planning what content to create, for whom, why, where it lives and how it's kept up to date.
- Contingency
- Part of a budget held back for problems or opportunities you can't predict.
- Contribution margin
- What's left from a sale after the costs that come with that sale (product cost, fees, delivery), before fixed costs; it contributes to covering overheads and profit.
- Conversion rate
- The share of people who complete a chosen action, such as buying, out of those who had the chance to.
- Creative brief
- A short document that tells a creative team the problem, the audience, the single most important message and what success looks like.
- CRM
- Customer relationship management: the strategy, processes and systems an organisation uses to manage its relationships with customers.
- Cross-border ecommerce
- Selling online to customers in another country.
- Cultural dimensions
- Frameworks, such as Hofstede's, that compare national cultures on a few measures; useful prompts, but they describe averages, not individuals.
- Customer experience (CX)
- The sum of a customer's interactions with an organisation and how they feel about them.
- Customer funnel
- A simple model of the stages from awareness to consideration to purchase and loyalty, used to set goals at each stage.
- Customer insight
- A fresh, evidence-based understanding of why customers act as they do that the organisation can act on.
- Customer lifetime value (CLV)
- The contribution an organisation expects from a customer over the whole relationship.
- Decision-making unit
- The people involved in a business purchase, such as the user, the buyer and the person who approves it.
- Digital marketplace
- Everywhere an organisation's customers, competitors and partners meet online: search, social platforms, marketplaces, review sites, apps and the organisation's own website.
- Direct to consumer (DTC)
- Selling straight to end customers through channels the organisation controls, without a retailer in between.
- Drop-off
- The point in a journey where people leave without finishing.
- Email segmentation
- Dividing an email list into groups so that each group gets messages that suit it.
- Five Case Model
- HM Treasury's framework for business cases, covering the strategic, economic, commercial, financial and management cases.
- Greenwashing
- Making environmental claims that are misleading, unclear or can't be backed up.
- Holdout group
- A group deliberately not shown the marketing, so that its results show what would have happened anyway.
- Incrementality
- The results that would not have happened without the marketing, found by comparing with what would have happened anyway.
- Integrated marketing communications
- Planning all of an organisation's messages and channels so that they work together towards the same objective with one consistent idea.
- KPI
- Key performance indicator: one of the few measures that show whether an objective is being met.
- Last-click attribution
- Giving all the credit for a conversion to the final touchpoint before it.
- Leading question
- A question worded so that it pushes the respondent towards a particular answer.
- Localisation
- Adapting content, language, prices, payment and service so that they feel native to a market, not just translated.
- Loyalty scheme
- A programme that rewards customers for repeat purchases or engagement.
- Market entry mode
- The way an organisation enters a new country, such as exporting online, using a distributor, licensing, a joint venture or setting up its own operation.
- Market segmentation
- Dividing a market into groups of customers with similar needs or behaviour who respond to marketing in a similar way.
- Marketing mix modelling
- A statistical method that estimates how much each marketing activity, and other factors such as price and season, contributed to sales over time.
- Marketing ROI
- The return on marketing investment: the extra contribution the marketing generated, minus what it cost, divided by what it cost.
- Moderation
- Setting and enforcing the rules for a community's conversations.
- Online community
- A group of people who interact with each other, not just with the brand, around a shared interest.
- Online marketplace
- A platform where many sellers list products and the platform takes a fee on each sale.
- Options appraisal
- Comparing realistic options, including doing the minimum, before recommending one.
- Paid search
- Adverts shown against search results, usually paid for each click.
- Paid, owned and earned media
- Paid media is space you buy; owned media is channels you control, such as your website and email list; earned media is coverage and sharing you don't pay for.
- Pain point
- A moment in the customer's experience that causes frustration, effort or doubt.
- Path to purchase
- The steps a customer moves through from first noticing a need to buying and buying again, including where they look and who influences them.
- Payback period
- How long it takes for the money an investment brings in to cover what it cost.
- PECR
- The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, which set extra rules for marketing by email, text and phone, and for cookies.
- Persona
- A short, evidence-based portrait of a typical customer in a target segment.
- PESTLE
- A checklist for scanning the external environment: political, economic, social, technological, legal and environmental factors.
- Physical evidence
- The tangible signs that let customers judge a service before or after they use it, such as packaging, a website or a receipt.
- Portfolio
- The single collection of work you build for one organisation across the whole course.
- Positioning
- The place an organisation wants its offer to hold in the target customer's mind, relative to the alternatives.
- Primary research
- Research you carry out yourself for a specific question, such as a survey or interviews.
- Product portfolio
- The full set of products or services an organisation offers, and how they work together.
- Progress marker
- A plain statement of what you can now do after a topic, used to rate your own progress.
- Psychic distance
- How different a foreign market feels in language, culture, business practice and law, which can matter more than geographic distance.
- Qualitative research
- Research that explores reasons and meanings through words, for example interviews.
- Quantitative research
- Research that measures how many or how much, for example a survey with closed questions.
- Retailer margin
- The share of the shelf price a retailer keeps.
- Retention rate
- The share of customers who stay over a period; the opposite of churn.
- Risk register
- A list of risks, each with its likelihood, impact, owner and the action to reduce it.
- Route to market
- The path a product takes to reach the buyer, such as the organisation's own online shop, an online marketplace, retailers or wholesalers.
- Sales activation
- Communications that prompt people who are ready to buy to act now.
- Scope of work
- What an agency or freelancer is contracted to deliver, by when and for what fee.
- Search engine optimisation (SEO)
- Improving content and a website so that they appear for relevant searches without paying for each click.
- Search intent
- What the person searching is trying to do: learn something, find a particular site, compare options or buy.
- Secondary research
- Information someone else has already collected, such as official statistics, company accounts or published reports.
- Sensitivity analysis
- Testing how a result changes when a key assumption changes.
- Single-minded proposition
- The one thing the communication must leave the audience believing or feeling.
- Soft opt-in
- A PECR exception that lets an organisation email or text its own customers about similar products if it gave them a clear chance to opt out when it collected their details and in every message.
- Standardisation and adaptation
- The choice between keeping the marketing the same in every country and changing it to suit each one.
- Statement of work
- A document setting out the scope, deliverables, timeline, fees and responsibilities for a piece of agency work.
- Strategic audit
- A structured review of where an organisation stands now: its market, customers, offer, compliance and performance, with the main issues to act on.
- Substantiation
- The evidence an advertiser must hold before making a claim that can be objectively checked.
- Targeting
- Choosing which segments to serve, and how many, based on their attractiveness and the organisation's ability to win them.
- Touchpoint
- Any point where a customer meets the organisation or hears about it, online or offline.
- UK GDPR
- The UK General Data Protection Regulation, which with the Data Protection Act 2018 sets the rules for using personal data in the UK.
- User experience (UX)
- How easy, useful and pleasant it is for someone to do what they came to do on a website, app or service.
- User journey map
- A step-by-step picture of how a user moves through a task, with what they do, think and feel and where they get stuck.
- Value proposition
- A clear statement of the benefit a target customer gets, why it matters to them and why this organisation delivers it better than the alternatives.
- Vanity metric
- A number that looks impressive but doesn't show whether a business objective is being met.
- Welcome series
- A short sequence of automated emails sent to new subscribers or customers.
- Working and non-working spend
- Working spend buys media that reaches people; non-working spend pays for producing the content and managing the work.