Hirst AcademyMarketing in Practice
← Course overview
Module 15

Business Cases, Risk and Leadership

Estimated time: 6–7 hours · The final milestone: the decision-ready case a marketing leader puts to the people who hold the budget.

Why it matters. Good ideas lose to well-argued ones. The business case is how marketing earns a seat at the table where the money is decided. Leaders don't only run campaigns. They win the budget and the people to run them, choose between options and own what could go wrong. This topic turns your portfolio into the document a leader takes into the room: a review of what happened, a case for what should happen next, the risks managed and the people led. It closes the Leader stage with Milestone 4: a performance review with ROI and a business case, and it draws on Modules 1–14.

Progress marker: I can make a decision-ready business case, manage its risks and lead the people who deliver it. Rate yourself now on this marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it) and note your rating in your portfolio.

Choose your route. On a first pass, work through the lessons in order: each one builds the next section of the Performance Review and Business Case Builder, and Lesson 15.5 needs the review, options, cases, risks and leadership plan from the lessons before it. If a decision is due this week, read the worked example, then start at Lesson 15.2. If you have no budget to ask for, make the case for a change you would like your organisation, placement or club to make; every task works the same way. The demonstration organisation is Larkfield Coffee Roasters, with its agency Northlight Studio. Both are fictional, and all their figures are illustrative.

Interactive Tool

Performance Review and Business Case Builder

Milestone 4: your performance review with ROI, the options you considered, the business case using the Five Case Model, a risk register and your leadership plan, as one printable, decision-ready document.

Open the tool →
15.1

The Performance Review as Evidence

A decision-maker has little time and a fair suspicion of marketing reports. A performance review for a business case is a short, honest account in four parts: what we did, what happened, what we learned, and what it means for the next decision. Read the worked example later in this topic first.

Start from your own numbers. You built the pieces in Module 6 and Module 14. Pull them together: the objective and the baseline you were measured against, the result, the cost, the ROI, and the assumption it rests on. If part of the result would have happened anyway, say how you estimated that and that it is an estimate.

Be honest about misses. A missed target does not sink a case. A hidden one does, because the first awkward question will find it. Say what was missed, by how much, and what you think caused it. Then say whether the investment still earned its money. Both can be true.

End on meaning. Finish with one sentence beginning "So what this tells us is". That is the bridge to the options.

Keep it short. If the review runs past one page, the reader is being asked to do your analysis for you.

Learning ObjectiveWrite a one-page performance review of your organisation's marketing that a decision-maker can use as evidence, including what missed.
Deliverable — your plan must include1. The objective, the baseline and the result, with the source of each
2. The cost, the ROI and the assumption behind it
3. What missed, by how much, and your best explanation
4. One sentence on what it means for the next decision
Evaluation Criteria1. Is every figure traceable to your earlier work or a named source?
2. Does the review say plainly what did not work?
3. Could a reader act on the final sentence?
15.2

Making the Case

A business case sets out why an investment is needed, the options, the costs, the benefits and risks, and a recommendation. It is an argument for a decision: what we should do, why, what it costs, what could go wrong and who will do it.

The Five Case Model. HM Treasury's framework splits the argument into five parts:

CaseThe question it answers
StrategicWhy do this, and does it fit what we are trying to achieve?
EconomicWhich option gives the best value?
CommercialCan we buy or arrange what we need, and on what terms?
FinancialCan we afford it, and what is the cash profile?
ManagementWho delivers it, how, and how will we know it is working?

UK example: the Treasury's guidance. HM Treasury publishes Guidance on Developing Business Cases for projects and programmes, based on the Five Case Model (first published 16 May 2024). It sits beside the Green Book, the Treasury's appraisal guidance, which has a 2026 edition after a 2025 review. Both are written for public spending, so borrow the structure, not the rules. Check gov.uk for the current versions and for how the guidance handles options.

Options appraisal. Compare realistic options, and always include doing the minimum. It is the baseline: every other option has to beat it. An option with no real alternative beside it is a decision already made.

Use your milestones. Your options should come from work you have already done. If you planned a second market in Module 13, that plan is a ready-made option, with its contribution per customer. The lifetime value from Module 12 turns customers into money, and the campaign you planned in Module 7 is what your review judges.

Judging the money. ROI is (benefit − cost) ÷ cost. Payback is how long until the money back covers the cost. Both need a stated benefit, and the benefit needs a stated assumption.

Sensitivity. Change the assumption you trust least and see what happens. Find the break-even point, the result where benefit equals cost, and ask how far the plan is from it.

Learning ObjectiveBuild a business case for your organisation using the Five Case Model, compare at least three options including doing the minimum, and test the recommended option with a sensitivity check.
Deliverable — your plan must include1. Three options, with costs, benefits and the assumption behind each benefit
2. ROI for the recommended option, and its break-even point
3. A sensitivity case in which the key assumption is worse
4. One short paragraph for each of the five cases
Evaluation Criteria1. Is doing the minimum a real option with a stated outcome?
2. Do the sums check, and is every assumption labelled?
3. Does the sensitivity case show whether the recommendation survives?
15.3

Managing Risk

A risk register is a list of what could go wrong, each with its likelihood, impact, owner and the action to reduce it. It is the part of a case that shows you have thought past the good news.

Look in five places. Commercial risks affect sales and money, such as slow uptake or a currency move. Operational risks affect delivery, such as capacity or delays. Legal risks come from rules, such as consumer and data law. Ethical risks are about doing the right thing, such as claims you can't support. Reputational risks are what the others cost you in trust. You met the rules side in Module 5, and an unsupported claim is both an ethical and a reputational risk.

Score and rank. Give each risk a likelihood and an impact from 1 to 5, and multiply. A risk scoring 4 for likelihood and 3 for impact scores 12. The scale is a convention, not a law of nature, and the scores are your judgement. Show your reasoning so someone can disagree with it.

Every risk needs an owner and an action. An owner is one named person. An action says what will be done and by when, or what would trigger it. "Monitor" is not an action.

Plan the trigger. For the biggest risks, decide in advance what you'll see that tells you to act or to stop.

Risks you choose to accept. Some risks aren't worth reducing. Write down which, and why.

Learning ObjectiveBuild a risk register for your recommended option covering commercial, operational, legal, ethical and reputational risks, each scored, owned and acted on.
Deliverable — your plan must include1. At least six risks across the five types
2. A likelihood, impact and score for each
3. A named owner and a specific action for each
4. A trigger for the two highest-scoring risks
Evaluation Criteria1. Does the register include a risk that is uncomfortable for your own plan?
2. Does each action say what happens, not just that someone will watch?
3. Can you explain each score?
15.4

Leading Marketing

The best case still fails if the people who must act on it aren't with you. Leading marketing means getting a decision made and then getting the work done, often by people you don't manage.

Know what each person needs. The finance adviser wants to see the sums and the downside. The managing director wants a clear choice and a recommendation. The delivery team wants to know what changes for them. An agency wants a clear brief, as you learned in Module 10. Write down, for each, what they need from you and what they might worry about.

Lead people you don't manage. You have no authority over an agency or another department. You have clarity, fairness and your word. Say what is needed and by when, give feedback quickly, and credit good work in public.

Communicate the decision, including a no. If your case is approved, say what happens next and who does what. If it is turned down, say what was decided, why, and what happens instead. Don't blame, and don't let the team find out sideways.

Look after the team. A launch adds work. Say what will stop to make room, and notice who is carrying too much.

AI activity. Ask an AI assistant to act as a sceptical finance director and challenge your case and risk register. Remove names and commercially sensitive figures first, or use public or invented ones. Decide which challenges are fair and answer them. Note any it raised that you had missed, and keep the challenges and your replies in your portfolio.

Learning ObjectivePlan how to lead the stakeholders, team and agencies through your decision and its delivery, and test your case against an AI-played sceptic.
Deliverable — your plan must include1. A stakeholder list with what each needs from you and what they may worry about
2. Who does what in delivery, including any agency, with one owner for each task
3. How you will tell people the decision, and a version if the answer is no
4. The AI challenges you accepted, rejected and had missed
Evaluation Criteria1. Does each stakeholder have a specific need, not a label?
2. Is there one owner for every task?
3. Are the AI challenges answered with evidence, not dismissed?
15.5

Milestone 4: The Review and Business Case

Milestone 4 is the last piece of your portfolio and the one you may actually use. It is one document that a decision-maker could read in the room. Read the worked example later in this topic first: it shows Maya's case for Larkfield.

The sections, in the order a reader needs them:

SectionFrom
Executive summaryWritten last, one page
Performance reviewLesson 15.1
Options and the five casesLesson 15.2
Risk registerLesson 15.3
Leadership planLesson 15.4
Recommendation and next stepsThis lesson

The executive summary. Write it last and keep it to one page. Open with the decision you are asking for and the date. Then the evidence, the recommendation with its ROI and break-even point, the main risk and what you need from the reader. If the reader stops there, they should still decide well.

Check the joins. The review's results feed the options. The costs match across the options, the financial case and the ROI. Every risk in the register has an owner who appears in the leadership plan. The recommendation is the option the economic case favours, or you say why not.

Ask for something specific. End with the decision, the date and the first three actions after a yes.

Learning ObjectiveAssemble the final portfolio piece: a performance review and business case for your organisation that agrees with itself and ends in a clear request.
Deliverable — your plan must include1. The review, options, five cases, risk register and leadership plan, built from Milestones 1 to 3 and your earlier work
2. A recommendation with a staged plan and a review point
3. A one-page executive summary that opens with the decision requested
4. Your final self-rating on every marker on the Progress Map
Evaluation Criteria1. Do the costs, benefits and owners agree across every section?
2. Could someone decide from the executive summary alone?
3. Does the recommendation say what would make you stop?
Worked Example

Larkfield Makes the Case for Ireland

Larkfield Coffee Roasters and Northlight Studio are fictional, and all figures are illustrative. Maya Collins (marketing manager) writes the case. Sarah Ahmed (managing director) decides with the finance adviser on 15 January 2027, for the year from 1 April 2027.

The review, from Lesson 15.1. The autumn campaign spent its £30,000 budget. Subscribers reached 2,057, net +257 against +300, so the target was missed by 43. Of 510 new subscribers, an estimated 240 were incremental, assuming the 90-a-month baseline would have held. At a lifetime value of £160, 240 × £160 = £38,400, and ROI is (£38,400 − £30,000) ÷ £30,000 = 28% (60% at £200). Cost per incremental subscriber was £125, against £100. Maya says both: missed, yet worth the money.

The options, from Lesson 15.2.

OptionCostBenefit
A: do the minimum, keep the UK planNo new spendThe baseline
B: launch in the Republic of Ireland£45,000500 × £124 = £62,000
C: same money, UK retention only£45,000Not yet estimated

B costs £25,000 marketing + £12,000 set-up, logistics and compliance + £8,000 contingency = £45,000. £124 is £6.20 a month, the contribution per Irish subscriber from Maya's plan in Module 13, × 20 months, the lifetime at 5% churn from Module 12. ROI is (£62,000 − £45,000) ÷ £45,000 = 37.8%. Break-even is £45,000 ÷ £124, about 363 subscribers. At 300, 300 × £124 = £37,200: £7,800 short. With no monthly forecast, Maya gives no payback date and says so. She can't size C yet.

The five cases. Strategic: growth has stalled. Economic: B beats A on the sums. Commercial: own shop, euro storefront, no Irish retailers in year one. Financial: £45,000 in the year from 1 April 2027. Management: below.

The risks. Each has a named owner. The scores are Maya's judgement and aren't shown here. Currency movement: Sarah, with the finance adviser. Customs and delivery delays: Leo, after a trial parcel. Slow uptake: Maya, at the month 6 review. EU consumer and data rules: Maya, each rule checked. Roastery capacity at Christmas: Sarah. An unqualified claim: Maya, with an Irish reviewer.

The recommendation. B, staged, with a month 6 review. Maya leads. Leo runs the Irish storefront and campaigns. Northlight adapts the creative with an Irish reviewer.

Knowledge Check

  1. A colleague says Option B returns £62,000 on £45,000, so its ROI is 138%. What is wrong?
    That divides the return by the cost; ROI takes the cost off first, so (£62,000 − £45,000) ÷ £45,000 = 37.8%.
  2. At £124 per Irish subscriber, how many are needed to cover £45,000, and why does that matter?
    About 363 (£45,000 ÷ £124 = 362.9, so 363); it is the break-even point, and the 500 target sits above it while 300 falls below.
  3. Why include doing the minimum as an option?
    It is the baseline every other option must beat; without it a reader cannot see whether the spending is worth it.
  4. A reader asks who will deliver the launch and how you will know it is working. Which of the five cases answers that?
    The management case: owners, delivery steps and the review points that show whether it is on track.
  5. What makes "Reputational risk from an unqualified claim" a usable register entry rather than just a worry?
    It has a named owner, a specific action and a trigger, and is scored for likelihood and impact so it can be ranked.
  6. An AI playing a sceptical finance director says your sales forecast is too optimistic. What do you do?
    Test the forecast with a sensitivity case, answer with evidence where it is fair, and record the challenge and your reply rather than ignoring it.

Resources & Further Practice

  • HM Treasury business case guidance: Guidance on Developing Business Cases on gov.uk, at gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-developing-business-cases. Check the current version and its date, and how it handles options.
  • The Green Book: HM Treasury's appraisal guidance, at gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book-appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-government. Check which edition is current. It is written for public spending, so borrow the thinking, not the rules.
  • Regulators for your risk register: the Information Commissioner's Office for data and marketing messages, the Advertising Standards Authority for advertising claims, and the Competition and Markets Authority for consumer law. Read their own pages and date what you read. This isn't legal advice.
  • Your own numbers: reopen your KPI baselines, attribution notes and ROI sum from the earlier topics, and check every figure in your review against its source.
  • Further practice: ask one person who handles budgets, such as a finance colleague or tutor, to read your executive summary and tell you what they would challenge. Then print the Performance Review and Business Case Builder as Milestone 4.
Checkpoint

Your Portfolio and Where You Started

  • What I made: a performance review with ROI, three options, a business case, a risk register, a leadership plan and a one-page executive summary, all saved in the Performance Review and Business Case Builder.
  • The strategic audit's three issues from Module 6, checked against what I know now: which still stand, which have changed, and which I would add.
  • The Progress Map then and now: Rate yourself again on this topic's progress marker (not yet, with support, independently or could teach it), and on every other marker, and note your before and after ratings in your portfolio.
  • The topic where I grew most, and the evidence that shows it.
  • What I'll do next with this portfolio: an interview, a placement report, or a proposal at work.